active network espn

Currently Being Moderated

Is U.S. Too Good at Softball?

Posted by mikeyactive on Aug 19, 2008 5:04:10 PM

The good news: Team USA  has dominated every one of their opponents during the Beijing Olympics. The bad  news: Team USA  has dominated every one of their opponents during the Beijing Olympics.

       There was a time when the competitive balance of fastpitch softball on the  international level was fairly even. During the 2000 Olympic Games in Sydney, the distance  between the pitching mound and home plate was a paltry 40 feet; leading to  close—if high-scoring games--that gave any international team a chance to win.

"Granted the games went too long but at least they were competitive and  everybody had a chance to beat us,” said  Hall of Fame softballer Michele Smith . “Australia had a  chance to beat us and did. Japan  had a chance to beat us and did beat us. China did the same thing. That's  exciting."  

Some fear the now standard 43 feet between mound and plate in international  play, which was introduced to cut down on scoring, has produced a competitive  advantage for a dominant USA Softball pitching staff that is almost impossible  to hit.   

And losing the Olympics might be the price we pay for success.  

We're Number One 

Everyone has a theory about what happened. Why a sport that seemed to be  ascending in the world of international competition was suddenly removed from  the Olympic rotation after the 2008 games in Beijing.   

Some, such as Smith, think softball got lumped in with the national pastime  unintentionally. "I think they expected to make that decision for baseball  and not for softball. It was a comedy of events for softball to get voted  out." Others think it's nothing more than an Anti-American bias. (Check  any softball message board for affirmation to this fact.)   

Others, like shortstop Natasha Watley of the U.S. National team, think the  international fan base just isn't there. "Softball is a great spectator  sport. We have great fans here in the U.S. But I think that's where we're  hurting. It's not a world-wide sport."  

But everyone agrees that it's imperative to get softball back in the  Olympics. Not just so players like Cat Osterman and Jennie Finch have places to  throw their devastating riseballs but for countries who depend on international  Olympic funding to support their teams and promote softball in their respective  countries.  

"I worry about the Australian teams--Italy,  Great Britain, and Greece,"  Smith points out. "Any of the teams that were really starting to make some  progress in the European countries where we have to get stronger--it's  essentially going to kill them over there."  

Beijing or Bust 

Osterman echoes the sentiments of many current and former USA softball players when she stresses the  significance of this year’s games in China. "This is one of our  last go-arounds. We're ready to put everything we have into it."   

But it may be the performance of the Chinese National Team that determines  softball's chances for inclusion in the 2016 games. Of all the rising teams in  international play, nobody has improved faster or spent more money leading up  to the games than China.   

So if you see some members of the USA Softball fraternity privately waving a  Chinese flag during the Olympic Games you'll know it's not just case of  conflicted loyalties -- but self-preservation.

700 Views Tags: softball, 2008_olympic_games, 2008_beijing_olympics


Aug 20, 2008 1:40 PM SoftballPerformance_com SoftballPerformance_com    says:

There are several reasons why softball was rejected but one of the main one has to do more with being perceived as women's baseball rather being too American. Yes the anti-american feeling in the world probably played a little bit but at the same time, most IOC members are from countries with no culture of softball and they associate softball with doping, not sending its players, etc. because baseball has those problem. It is really a matter of perception.

 

I posted a link on my blog about

Why Softball Got Kicked Out of the Olympics.

Aug 20, 2008 2:14 PM Jesse@Active Jesse@Active    says:

In an article in today's +San Diego Union-Tribune+, Mark Zeigler writes about the one IOC voter who may have been able to save softball, had he voted.

 

"+Fifty-two IOC members had voted against softball, but it was who didn't vote that, when it leaked out weeks later, drew the ire of the legions of ponytailed American players and their parents: Jim Easton.

 

He owned Easton Sports, which makes aluminum bats, and was among the sport's biggest advocates. He also is an IOC member who at the time was an IOC vice president.+"

 

I guess there's a little bit more to it...the whole conflict-of-interest thing. But I think the loss of baseball and softball also has to do with money. Why would hosting nations other than the U.S. or those in Latin America want bb or sb in the Games? Multiple fields are probably pretty expensive to build and maintain, probably will be torn down, and from what I've seen in China, aren't drawing huge attendance numbers. (Though major leaguers might help that.)

 

It also costs a lot for a competing country to send an entire team over just to get trounced by the Americans. As a baseball fan, I'd love to see it continue to be an Olympic sport, especially if Chicago wins the 2016 bid. But I think right now bb/sb fall into the same category as cricket and rugby -- they're just not globally competitive.

Aug 21, 2008 7:46 AM Trish18 Trish18    says:

The U.S. had a shaky game against Japan that went into extra innings yesterday. They ended up winning 4-1 to get to the gold medal game, but it demonstrated that anything could happen. Unfortunately for the U.S., that held true today.

 

Losing for the first time since 2000, the U.S. softball team was denied a chance for a fourth straight gold medal in the sport's last appearance in the Olympics for at least eight years--and maybe for good. :/ As disappointing is that is, it helps a little bit to think that the perhaps moved the international game forward.