active network espn

Active Expert: Bruce Hildenbrand : February 17, 2008

Previous Next

2

As reported earlier, Rock Racing started only five riders in today's first stage, the 2.1-mile prologue, in the 2008 Amgen Tour of California(AToC). AToC organizers excluded three of Rock Racing's riders supposedly because they had open doping investigations. Rock Racing has maintained that there are no open investigations, but race organizers held firm. Frankly, it is not clear to me that there are any open doping investigations. I haven't seen any public mention that there are any open investigations and none of the Rock Racing riders have been privately notified that they are under investigation.

What is interesting to me is the parallel between what happened earlier this week to Team Astana. In the Astana affair, Amaury Sports Organization (ASO) issued a statement that Team Astana will not be invited to any ASO events, which includes the Tour de France. ASO cited the past history of doping on the team as their reason for the exclusion. However, Team Astana is a completely different team in 2008. Gone are all the riders implicated in any 2007 doping infractions as well as the whole team management.

So, if all the problem riders and team personnel are gone the team should be clean. The only rider on the team with a potential problem is Alberto Contador who has been linked to the same Operacion Puerto affair that AToC organizers used as a reason to exclude the three Rock Racing riders.

I think the decisions to exclude three riders from the AToC and Team Astana from the Tour are unfair. If you are upset that Levi may not get to ride in France, I think to be consistent, you have to also be upset that Tyler, Oscar and Santiago aren't riding the AToC. Would it be fair to allow Team Astana to ride the Tour de France if they don't bring Alberto Contador? How do you all feel about this? Do you all agree that both decisions are unfair?


On to the racing news, which I hope will shortly eclipse all this talk of doping. My pre-race prediction (and I made that prediction on Thursday), Fabian Cancellara, obliterated the competition winning by a substantial four-second margin in the short, 2.1-mile prologue time trial. Levi Leipheimer, who won the first two prologue time trials in 2006 and 2007, finished fourth, six seconds back.

No big surprises in the race for the overall. All the overall contenders finished within 20 seconds of each other. With several big climbing stages and a 15-mile time trial yet to come, the race is still a dead heat. Cancellara could hold the jersey for the next two days which offers only moderate climbing and flat finishes. However, come stage 3 on Wednesday, when both Mount Hamilton and Sierra Road are on the agenda, look for the 2006 Paris-Roubaix Champion and two-time World Time Trial Champion to hopefully transfer the jersey to one of his teammates such as Jens Voigt, Stuart O'Grady or Bobby Julich.

Bruce

2 Comments Permalink
0

The storm surrounding the Rock Racing Team's roster for the Amgen Tour of
California(AToC) has subsided a bit with the announcement from team owner
Michael Ball that the squad will start only five riders on Sunday, leaving
Oscar Sevilla, Santiago Botero and Tyler Hamilton on the sidelines. The
team will be composed of Michael Creed, Doug Ollerenshaw, Victor Hugo Pena,
Freddie Rodriguez and Super Mario Cipollini. The entire team voted to start
with the shortened roster.

At issue here is whether the three Rock Racing riders are part of any active
doping investigations. At a press conference on Saturday, Michael Ball
provided documentation, a letter from the Federacion Ciclismo de Colombia
indicating that Botero is not under investigation, a letter from Real
Federacion Espanolo de Ciclismo indicating that Sevilla is not under
investigation and also a letter from UCI president Pat McQuaid indicating
that Oscar Sevilla is not currently under investigation. Ball maintains
that Tyler has never been informed that there is a pending anti-doping case.
Furthermore Ball contends that Hamilton cannot be sanctioned for anything
stemming from Operacion Puerto because according to the rules it would
'pre-date the case for which he has already served a suspension'.

Race organizers maintain that there is an open investigation involving the
named riders citing that the Operacion Puerto case was been re-opened on
February 14th. However, Sevilla, Botero and Hamilton have not been explicitly
named in the new investigation. Given that they were all named in the 2006
Operacion Puerto it can be assumed that they will be named and investigated,
but at this time it is only speculation what the prosecutors in Spain are
doing. Is that enough evidence to assert that the three riders are currently
under investigation?

Obviously, this is a very touchy situation for both sides. There is enough
gray area here to feel that both sides have made a case, however, since it
appears that the race organization's ousting is based on the re-opening of
the Operacion Puerto case, it would be prudent to verify that the case has
indeed been re-opened.

One thing that is interesting in this whole sordid affair is that the USADA
recently told AToC race organizers that it cannot comment if there are any
active investigations on riders. This is to protect a rider from being tainted
undeservedly or any unwarranted actions if the investigation finds no illegal
activity. So, how does the race organization know of any active investigations
if the national doping agencies will not comment? We are treading very closely
to stripping all rights riders have to fair and impartial treatment.

Bruce

0 Comments Permalink

Active Expert: Bruce Hildenbrand

Special Tour de France coverage from Bruce Hildenbrand.