active network espn

Active Expert: Gale Bernhardt

Previous Next
6

Cheaters

Posted by Gale Bernhardt Nov 7, 2008

Early October, I started a community discussion thread on the subject of people drafting in non-drafting races. I asked readers to chime in on what they see in races.

This week, in post 56, Jesse Hammond posted a link to a photograph of a guy using fins at Ironman Florida this year. The internet has been on fire with discussions about "Finman". (For those of you that are not familiar with the rules in triathlon, fins are definitely not allowed. Also, drafting during the bike segment is not allowed in any race for age groupers. Drafting is only allowed for professional, ITU racers.)

I've read a few posts from several of the discussion boards and was somewhat surprised that some people didn't care about Finman or drafters. They were apathetic. Their attitude was, "It didn't affect my personal race or my personal results. I'm not aiming for a spot on the podium. After all triathlon is an individual sport and it's all about me racing myself to see if I can better my own time. I don't care what other people do."

Really?

So, Team Apathy doesn't care that any rules or principles are broken as long as it doesn't affect them personally? I have a problem with that attitude - I don't like it.

It would be impossible to have order in sport if no one cared about rule enforcement until the lack of rule enforcement affected them personally.

In the case of incidental drafting, I know there are times when athletes are tired and not paying attention. They stay too long in the draft zone, they get caught drafting and they get a penalty. It was a mistake and will likely not happen again.

What about repeat offenders, blatant cheaters?

Wearing fins in the swim is pretty obvious cheating. I wish blatant drafters could be called out in a more obvious manner. They tarnish the sport. They are no better than Finman.

If it is too hard to enforce drafting rules, for whatever reason, then perhaps it's time for race directors and officials to just throw up their hands and simply allow drafting. For those that don't want to draft and want to test their individual mettle as a triathlete, they can simply choose not to draft. After all, what everyone else is doing really doesn't affect them, so draft away.

If Team Apathy members grow and dominate sport, what will happen?

Probably, no one will care.



Add a comment Leave a comment on this blog post.
Nov 7, 2008 3:37 PM Reply Click to view Jesse@Active's profile Jesse@Active

Hmmm...this sounds vaguely familiar. Some competitors cheat while others look the other way or are apathetic. Officials promise they're trying to enforce the rules, but don't have the manpower to catch everyone or are just too excited about the growth of the sport to work very hard at it.

The problem grows until athletes can't maintain consistently good results without cheating, since "everyone else is doing it." But when the curtain finally comes up, the sport's popularity risks imploding due to a loss of sponsorship dollars, public trust, etc.

Granted, cycling's doping problems are a little more severe than drafting in triathlon, but the mindset is very similar: "I'll do what I can get away with in order to have the best performance my body is capable of."

Nov 10, 2008 1:02 PM Reply Click to view Gale Bernhardt's profile Gale Bernhardt in response to: Jesse@Active

Jesse ~

Good observations.

I think it is really difficult to enforce the drafting rules when:

1) The bike courses are flat, have lots of turns or are multi-looped
2) When the swim heats are set off close together
3) Swim heats are set off in order of slowest competitors to fastest ones
4) The race is huge (a large number of entrants)
5) The stakes are high (money, great prizes, IM slots, prestige)

There are probably more items to add to the list. Also, I think it gets worse when more than one item exists at a race.

Nov 10, 2008 6:25 PM Reply Guest Ginny

I agree with you that anyone using fins or drafting in a triathlon is cheating. I play by the rules and hate it when I see particpants cheating, whether or not it directly affects me. Did Finman get disqualified? If that many people saw him, he should have been DQ'd. As for the drafting, USAT catches as many as they can, I guess. If all the rules were thrown out since Team Apathy doesn't care, then triathlons would become much more dangerous like bike racing and would no longer be an individual sport where you test what you and you alone are capable of doing. I still can't believe drafting is allowed in the Olympics. I've been doing tri's as an individual for alomost 20 years. If those type of rules are thrown out, then I won't be in the sport any longer.

Nov 11, 2008 9:42 AM Reply Click to view Gale Bernhardt's profile Gale Bernhardt in response to: Ginny

I'm not sure what the end result of the "Finman Scandal" is - or if it has ended yet. I'll do some digging to see what I can find.

As for drafting allowed in the Olympics, I will have an opportunity to find out how the whole drafting-at-the-Olympics thing unfolded. I have some speculations, but I will be in Madrid for the ITU pre-Congress workshops so I plan to sit down with Les McDonald (the first and only president of ITU who is retiring this year) to ask him more about how drafting and Olympics unfolded.

I've had an opportunity to talk to Les in the past, when I sat next to him at a dinner event at a World Cup race in Cancun. We did talk some about getting a sport into the Olympics, but we didn't talk specifically about drafting.

Knowing what I know now about the Olympic Games process, I suspect some of the issues included the following (know these items are my opinion and not the "official" reasons):

1) The ability to administer rules in a fair and consistent manner. As we've seen in the community discussion, it is very difficult (some would say impossible) to administer the no-drafting rules. The imaginary no-drafting box is difficult to judge. Think about a field of 90 professional athletes from different countries all trying to score World Cup points in a race. How many marshals would be needed to keep the race fair and where should they be positioned? Not only are World Cup points awarded, so is prize money. Then comes the Olympic Games, administering a fair race.

2) Race distance. Running and qualifying for a marathon in the Olympic Games is hard enough. To ask people to do multiple Ironman-distance races in the two years leading up to the Games in order to qualify countries and athlete start positions would be impossible. Few athletes are suited to handle multiple Ironman races in a year. Then, the interest of spectators to watch a 8-10 hour event is not going to fly. So, go to a shorter distance. The Olympic Distance is definitely more manageable. But...in the early to mid-1990s, the sport wasn't as large as it is now. Spectators would have had little to no interest in sittting in a stadium to watch two transitions and a race finish - even for an event as "short" as an Olympic tri. There has to be more entertainment for spectator, televisions and International Olympic Committee interest - if - the sport doesn't have a deep Olympic history like the marathon.

3) Manageable race venues around the world. Administering a multiple-loop course that must include water and closed roads is easier to pull off than out-and-back courses.

4) Related to all of the above is a fair process that qualifies country slots and athlete slots. Last summer I wrote a series of columns on the Olympic process. See https://www.active.com/triathlon/Articles/2008__An_Olympic_Year.htm and all of the links at the bottom of the column. Those columns only scratch the surface.

I will admit that in the late 1980s through the 1990s, I was not a draft-legal triathlon fan. Now, after having experience with the ITU format from 2000 to the present, I cannot see how a non-drafting race would ever be fair. In my opinion, I don't believe there is a single non-draft-legal race where there is no drafting at all. I believe there are some people that will cheat given the opportunity and the race marshals can't be everywhere. Therefore, there is drafting in all races. If there are any races that are completely free of drafting, the race and the athletes deserve a special award.

Nov 12, 2008 10:19 AM Reply Guest Larry

One of the best examples I have seen of upholding the no-drafting rule was a race where the director had the local bike club on the course as marshalls. Granted, I am sure they were not official, "I took a 4 hour class and can ride a motorcylce so I am a good marshall", officials. However, the triathletes knew the bike club was on the course with the basic information of xx bike lengths between racers and if caught you had to stop and put your foot down for 30 seconds. The roadies loved it as they could bust us tri-geeks doing what we (well those other cheaters..) were not suppose to be doing - drafting. And the director made a nice donation to the bike club as well. The logistics of this race made it abit easier for the roadies, as an entire lane was blocked off and most of the course was out and back so it could be covered easily. But otherwise, what to do? If a pack goes by me I call them all cheaters (and they hear me trust me) and then just refocus on my effort. If an IM slot is worth breaking the rules for then that person has bigger issues which competing in sports will not resolve. Maybe a grass roots level campaign would help? Yes - and as of Jan 20th we will all be deputies of the Obama nation and no one is going to fix things unless there is a movement to do so!! ok sorry... I am not that fired up. Or, we can just keep in mind it is JUST a sport.

Nov 13, 2008 10:06 AM Reply Click to view Gale Bernhardt's profile Gale Bernhardt in response to: Larry

Hey Larry ~

I like the idea of riders patrolling on bikes. As you mentioned in the pool this morning, there is no motorcycle noise to alert cheaters. Maybe we should start another community thread listing the best races that are fair (no drafting). Your Michigan race should be on the list. I wish the cheaters would keep in mind it is just a sport...

I think you need to follow-up on your idea for under-cover videographer...

Click to view Gale Bernhardt's profile

Gale Bernhardt

Member since: Jun 12, 2007

Gale Bernhardt's personal blog on triathlon, mountain biking, road cycling, running, "for women only" stuff, running with a dog and other issues in the endurance sports world.

View Gale Bernhardt's profile

Legend

  • We're Not Worthy We're Not Worthy: 10,000 - 1,000,000,000 pts
  • Legend Legend: 1,000 - 9,999 pts
  • Pro Pro: 300 - 999 pts
  • Expert Expert: 200 - 299 pts
  • Amateur Amateur: 40 - 199 pts
  • Rookie Rookie: 0 - 39 pts
  • Community Moderator Community Moderator
  • Active.com Staff Active.com Staff
  • SportsPowerStaff SportsPowerStaff