active network espn

Active Expert: Matt Fitzgerald

Previous Next
4

10 Percent Undertrained

Posted by Matt Fitzgerald Feb 21, 2008


There is an ancient expression used in endurance sports: "It's better to be 10 percent undertrained than 5 percent overtrained." I've never been too sure what to make of this expression. I mean, isn't it best to be 100 percent perfecly trained? But of late my attitude toward this unattributed piece of wisdom has changed, largely due to the frequency with which I see athletes--paticularly American distance runners--perform surprisingly well in early-season tune-up races and other races preceded by relatively moderate training, and perform poorly in peak races preceded by very high training loads.

It happened again at the U.S. National Cross-Country Championships in San Diego, which I had the pleasure of watching live. Dathan Ritzenhein blew away the field, winning by 26 seconds, despite the fact that an IT band injury had forced him to train exclusively on an antigravity treadmill until just 10 days before the event. Ritz's coach, Brad Hudson, told me after the race that he had been unsure whether Ritz should even compete, fearing that the young runner might have his confidence crushed by losing badly. He needn't have worried. Apparently his greater "freshness" more than made up for his limited fitness.

I'm starting to believe that there's no such thing as being 100 percent perfectly trained for a race--or at least that there's no way to know whether you're 100 percent perfectly trained. What the maxim that I cited at the beginning of this post now means to me is simply that one should always train somewhat conservatively in order to minimize the risk of overtraining. It's not that one should try to show up to races undertrained. It's that training is a blind process, in the sense that you cannot discern a clear line marking the threshold between undertrained and overtrained ahead of you. If you try to feel your way right up to this limit in training, you put yourself at great risk of crossing it, and I do believe that every step beyond the limit is equivalent to two steps behind it.

I think I overtrained myself slightly for my last marathon in December. This year I'm going to take a lesson from Dathan Ritzenhein and others and train with a bit more restraint. I still plan to do some workouts that are just as hard as the toughest workouts I did in my recent marathon ramp-up; I just won't do as many of them, and I will train more lightly betwen them as well. It's worth a try.



Feb 25, 2008 7:40 PM Click to view TriTroy's profile TriTroy

Reminds me of my first run at Wildflower in 2006 I think. Sam McGloane set a new course record. She's said at the pre-race meeting, for the Oly distance, that she'd recently come off an injury and was not able to do the training she'd wanted. For the really fit types, not me, I wonder if a little less intensity might be in order just to be really rested. Sam didn't seem to indicate that the difference may have been due to improvement in the areas not affected by her injury but don't know for sure. Also reminds me of one of the marathon sites, Hal Higdon perhaps, where he was surprised to hear of a runner that ran 3 mi every other day with a long run on the weekend and had a pretty descent finish time.

These bodies are wonderful machines.

TriTroy

Feb 26, 2008 8:58 AM Click to view Matt Fitzgerald's profile Matt Fitzgerald in response to: TriTroy

Great insights. And I think that what you hint at is true--that this is an issue that affects elites more than it does most other athletes. But although I'm hardly elite, I train close enough to my personal limits that the problem has affected me, too.

Mar 6, 2008 6:10 AM Click to view runningInZen's profile runningInZen

I agree Matt, I also beleive that monitoring one self can at least inform you of how close to peak performance you are or if you are slipping over the edge into overtraining. Keeping records of pulse, I've read from many sources, is one very good indicator. During some sharpening workouts or periodic time trials. Progress can be monitored effectively by Running a time trial and running it in a specific time and immediately taking one's pulse. As the peak of the season approaches, run the same time trial, attempting to run it in the exact same time, then checking the pulse again. If it's lower this time, then conditioning is improving, if it's higher, and training has been consistent, a rest may be needed. Keeping track of resting pulse is also a good measure of overtraing, if it spikes by more than 10 beats/min. Also listening to ones body. Take the minor aches and pains seriously, before they become serious and debilitating.

Mar 6, 2008 9:05 AM Click to view Matt Fitzgerald's profile Matt Fitzgerald in response to: runningInZen

Well said, Tom. I wear a heart rate monitor and GPS device during all of my runs and then download the data to Training Peaks WKO+ softwae for analysis. It allows me to continuously monitor pace/HR relationships, which is very instructive.

Legend

  • We're Not Worthy We're Not Worthy: 10,000 - 1,000,000,000 pts
  • Legend Legend: 1,000 - 9,999 pts
  • Pro Pro: 300 - 999 pts
  • Expert Expert: 200 - 299 pts
  • Amateur Amateur: 40 - 199 pts
  • Rookie Rookie: 0 - 39 pts
  • Community Moderator Community Moderator
  • Active.com Staff Active.com Staff