Thank you for your positive spin on the situation. That's a great point, that out of 250 tests only 2 came back positive. Unfortunately, people assume that since 2 were caught, there must be many more who doped but weren't caught. (And maybe there were, too, we can never know...)
For me the most annoying thing is the conventional media coverage. For the last two weeks, the L.A. Times has had only a tiny corner of a page, buried deep in the Sports section, with a photo and summary of the day's Tour stage. This morning, a large color photo of Rasmussen appeared on the newspaper's front page, with a full story taking up most of the Sports section's front page too. Suddenly, when something scandalous breaks out, they're interested in cycling!
I don't mean to be a wet blanket here, but I am just trying to look at the facts as we know them and apply to the real cycling world. Vino's B samples haven't yet been confirmed, but for this comment lets say that they will. So with that assumption...WHY would Vino cheat on Cyclings BIGGEST STAGE, KNOWING FULL WELL that he will be tested (time trial win)...and if caught, will lose EVERYTHING he's worked for his entire career! (remember that Astana had just announced they were ready to renew the team contract for ANOTHER 10 years, and Vino would most probably have moved up to Team Manager). So..he threw ALL THAT AWAY along with the team...(I don't See Astana being invited to the NEXT TDF, do you?) So WHY would he cheat? The ONLY answer I can come up with is that he didn't think he would get caught. And to follow that thread of thought, why would he think that? The ONLY answer I can come up with for that one is that he's done it before and NOT been caught. And to further this thought, if HE has done it before and not been caught, then WHO ELSE is cheating and not getting caught? Vino is (was) at the PINNACLE of pro cycling! He was the MAN TO BEAT coming into the race this year. If HE has been cheating, then MAYBE there is a LOT of water behind the damn of doping. I'm not sure how to burst the damn either. Obviously the cheaters are 1 or 2 steps ahead of the 'good guys' trying to catch them. And until SOMEONE comes forth with CURRENT PRACTICES of cheating and breaks the damn, we may never know the depths of the doping waters! Surely there's NO INCENTIVE to come forward if you are getting away with it! I truly HOPE AND PRAY this isn't the case, that doping is going on in a very SMALL scale in the Peleton, but I'm afraid that I might just be wearing the same blinders that the REST of the sports world is wearing!
With regard to Vino's supposed blood doping, I would like to know what type of tests the French lab used to determine that he indeed receive a "DONOR's blood". Simply saying there were 2 different types of red cells does not justify saying he blood doped.
To answer the question about needing a lot of equipment~not really. But I would worry about the technique!
And, for that matter, why is the French lab still doing the testing while they themselves are under investigation?
Testing of any type should be performed by a state-of-the art lab that IS NOT INVOLVED/partakes in the Tour!
I am a former hematology med tech and currently am employed as a research specialist.
I would love to be part of this lab!
Syllybee
Hi Ronan,
I have a question about the logistics involved with doping. How could Vino get a blood transfusion before a leg of the race ? I mean, doesn't it involve a lot of equipment, people, etc. ? When would he have got the time and space to do it unnoticed ? ... or does it imply that the whole team was involved ???
I feel bad for Kloden who had to quit with the rest of the team.