I would appreciate some comment on how the absence of time bonuses is effecting the tactical aspect of the race. What was the motivation in its elimination this year or the reason to have had it in the past?
Thank you,
EJ Levy
Nancy,
You are absolutlely right, I meant to say Sebastien. Yesterday was a tough day for all the riders and for me too maybe... ![]()
EJ,
Thanks for your question.
The time bonuses was a tradition on the Tour until this year, it was meant to make the race as attractive as possible and to have nice finishes. (sprints)
ASO (the Tour de France organizer) have decided to take this option away as they actually realized that it was paralyzing the Tour and many stages were boring as we knew that the sprinters would block the race to give everthing in the final seconds.
So, if they have decided to take time bonuses out of the race format, it is essentially to boost the race on the first part of the stages and to make sure that the sprinters team don't block the race.
We figured out that there was too many teams trying to hold each stage and play it in the final sprint.
This new format is meant to make the race funnier. From a tactical standpoint, some teams may have not fully understood how they can use it and what it really means in terms of wins but cycling is pretty conservative, so I assume it will take some time to see a real impact on the way the stages are being approached.
I hope this helps and feel free to get back to me if you wish to.
What was your guess?
Cheers,
Ronan
Hi Ronan,
Thank you for your reply. Even though I've viewed the TDF and other major races when broadcast I thought that the time bonuses were somewhat superfluous and an exercise in math more than anything else. It did seem to make a big difference in the overall GS at times however. There were times that a team might have tried to get ahead of a competitor just so he would not get those bonus seconds in the end. The Green jersey competition is based on the points accumulated so those sprinters shouldn't have been all that concerned with the time bonuses. Still, there are sprints for the sprinters on the flatter stages and at the "intermezzo" points along the course so wouldn't blocking be part of the action still? I never heard anything about blocking in previous races but I suppose it could have been that I didn't hear it or that Phil, Bob, and Paul forgot to point it out. I don't understand what you meant when you stated that the "new format is meant to make the race funnier." It is interesting to note that while blocking can come into play in even a well organized amateur race that rarely has that tactical aspect of the sport been addressed in commentary.
I suppose it is more elegant if your time is your time to the line and that's it.
Heads up!
E.J.
First off, I agree with you on the more "human" race, as well as one of the closer ones in recent history to this point.
The crowds certainly agree with you, but their passion is such that it would take more than a few stupid dopers to turn them away!!
But the high average speeds, along with the TT performances show that it CAN be done clean without the help of synthetic EPO, HGH, steroids and all of the other BS!!!!
My question is WHAT exactly were the track events that Robbie McEwen and Stu O'Grady competed in before becoming road sprinters????
I found Mark C's 'palmares' on line and he was (and STILL IS it seems) a points race/madison/scratch race rider and a sometimes team pursuit fill in.
Did Robbie and Stuart compete in the same events, or were they pursuiters/kilo riders?? (I could not find their bios/curriculum vitaes on line anywhere!)
Thanks,
Dave H.
You mean Sebastian, not Sylvain! Sebastian Chavanel just became the new Lanterne Rouge by 4:33. Wim Vansevenant has his work cut out for him to score a historic third Lanterne Rouge finish for the Tour.