active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
25 Replies Last post: Apr 1, 2006 8:40 AM by dg12002   Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next
Click to view ny1911's profile Amateur 28 posts since
Apr 27, 2004
15. Mar 31, 2006 12:08 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
I would be careful equating the age where you stop getting taller to the age where you stop growing. Complete physical maturity is reached closer to 18 for girls and 23 for boys. For a girl to be completely physically developed at 12 is certainly an anomally.
Click to view TheMountaineer's profile Pro 197 posts since
Mar 13, 2005
16. Mar 31, 2006 12:12 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
Firstly, take a step back, close you eyes, and count to ten.
Done?
Now let's hope we can maintain a discussion without any hostility.

I'm sorry I thought you were a man.
Same applies, just reverse the genitals and minus the voice box.

As a biology student, I'll give you a quick dummies guide to hormones and growth.

At the age of 10-12 (except in cases of abnormality), the body begins releasing hormones.

Sometimes, hormones can make you moody and upset over silly things (such as discussion forums).

Now, there are two forms of messengers working in the body, the nerves, and hormones. Nerves are for quick reactions, that need to happen in real time. Hormones are for changes over long periods of times.

Are you telling me you look the same today as you did when you were 12?

As a psychology student, I'd recommend learning to cool it, no one comes here looking for an argument, but I've seen you go on the defense in more than one topic today.
Click to view Ariann092's profile Legend 681 posts since
Jan 4, 2005
17. Mar 31, 2006 12:34 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
Please don't be patronizing, Dan. You're not a doctor and you're not a psychologist. I'm not sure how someone interprets a laugh, "ha!" as being defensive or hostile. I was simply amused at your assumptions. The fact of the matter is that I wear the same size I did when I was twelve - I fit into the dress I wore at my twelfth birthday in almost exactly the same way I did then. My face looks the same as when I was twelve - it would be hard to differentiate me from pictures then with pictures now except for the haircut and the style of clothes (I don't wear Converse hightops and sweater dresses anymore, for example). If anything, I have lost a bit of weight since then. My breasts have grown by a cup size, but my hips are the same width and all else appearance-wise seems pretty much the same. As I know many women who've had the same experience, I don't know if it's an anomaly or not.

My point was only that we can't infer from a tiny bit of information where this person is on his growth chart. That doesn't mean that he's not growing! I never said anything of the kind! But if you'll reread just the OP's posts, you'll see that he never says he isn't gaining weight - he makes no mention of his current weight or its change or lack thereof in the past months or years. So why does everybody automatically assume that he's not gaining weight? That he's growing or not growing? That he's not eating enough or he is eating enough? We don't have the data to do that. And am I really the only one who thinks it's irresponsible to give medical advice to a teenager over the internet instead of telling them that if they think they really have concerns they should see their doctor to see if they're legitimate or not? If he's on an athletic team at school, he's already had to see doctors to be allowed to run, and we're making assumptions we shouldn't.
Click to view JustMe1970's profile Amateur 11 posts since
Jul 15, 2005
18. Mar 31, 2006 12:58 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
quote:<HR>My point was only that we can't infer from a tiny bit of information where this person is on his growth chart. That doesn't mean that he's not growing! I never said anything of the kind! But if you'll reread just the OP's posts, you'll see that he never says he isn't gaining weight - he makes no mention of his current weight or its change or lack thereof in the past months or years. So why does everybody automatically assume that he's not gaining weight? That he's growing or not growing? That he's not eating enough or he is eating enough?<HR>


Fair enough, to a point. I completely agree that children looking for medical advice need to consult their parents and physicians rather than the dubious (and often patently incorrect) information distributed on internet message boards. Clearly we don't want 15-year olds trying to survive on salmon and ghee...

That said, there were a number of statements in the original post that deserved highlighting, even if just in the abstract.

I don't think, unless they are clinically obese and clearly have a problem which has been diagnosed by a qualified physician, that teenagers (of either gender, just to reinforce my earlier point) should diet. Period

Teenagers, by definition, are not fully mature - they're still growing and developing. You may say that you stopped gaining height at 12, but as pointed out elsewhere, your body continued to change dramatically through the rest of your teen years, even if much of that change was hidden from your eyes. Those key growth years are a time to give the body everything it needs. The worst thing a teenager can do is to restrict intake to try and fit within some arbitrary target on a scale.

I think a fixation with weight and diet is dangerous enough in fully-grown adults, without encouraging similar behaviour in highly vulnerable children.
Click to view ny1911's profile Amateur 28 posts since
Apr 27, 2004
19. Mar 31, 2006 2:03 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
He did discuss his findings on the number of calories to maintain his weight. Most of the fallout has come from your statement that if he's not losing weight, he's OK. That's more presumptuous about his position on any growth chart than the general statement that a boy his age should consume enough calories to support all of the growth that his body demands.

My statement that someone fully matured at 12 is anomaly was not meant to offend. It was just meant to indicate that your experience is not what the OP should expect.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by Ariann:

My point was only that we can't infer from a tiny bit of information where this person is on his growth chart. That doesn't mean that he's not growing! I never said anything of the kind! But if you'll reread just the OP's posts, you'll see that he never says he isn't gaining weight - he makes no mention of his current weight or its change or lack thereof in the past months or years. So why does everybody automatically assume that he's not gaining weight? That he's growing or not growing? That he's not eating enough or he is eating enough? We don't have the data to do that. And am I really the only one who thinks it's irresponsible to give medical advice to a teenager over the internet instead of telling them that if they think they really have concerns they should see their doctor to see if they're legitimate or not? If he's on an athletic team at school, he's already had to see doctors to be allowed to run, and we're making assumptions we shouldn't.
<HR>
Click to view dg12002's profile Legend 622 posts since
Aug 26, 2003
20. Mar 31, 2006 2:14 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ZZenko:


it doesn't seem like I eat that...

for lunch I have 2 pretzels and a drink, strawberry melon.. soft pretzels. I know, it should be more and I'm thinking about adding pb and j starting Monday.

then Dinner I have like.. say pasta..

and I have drinks in between, and 2 peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, one before and one after my runs.

I feel bad for people who don't run... losing weight for them must be very difficult
<HR>


Are you overeating with all that food?
You've got to be kidding right?

You are not eating anything worthwhile except the strawberry and melon. The pasta and PBJ's are moderate as far as substantial for overall health. You're cheating yourself by eating empty calories.
Click to view HSunshine's profile Pro 196 posts since
Sep 15, 2003
21. Mar 31, 2006 3:31 PM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
Seriously, ZZenko - you have the rest of your life to count calories and eat kale. You're a teenager, and there's nothing wrong with fruit and pretzels. It's not like you're eating pizza and soda and McD's and snickers.

Snack more if you're hungry OR if you're feeling tired on your runs. Perhaps swap out the pretzels for a sandwich here and there. Eat some baby carrots, maybe trail mix. But unless you're bonking on your runs or losing weight, you're probably ok.

You were pretty vague about your dinner, except to say that it's often pasta and you eat meat - so you may be taking in more calories than you think. It's really easy to down 800-1000 calories on a big pasta dinner, which is fine for a 8 mi/day teenage guy.
Click to view TheMountaineer's profile Pro 197 posts since
Mar 13, 2005
22. Apr 1, 2006 2:17 AM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
humm, food.
Click to view Ariann092's profile Legend 681 posts since
Jan 4, 2005
24. Apr 1, 2006 8:11 AM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
quote:<HR>Originally posted by JustMe1970:
That said, there were a number of statements in the original post that deserved highlighting, even if just in the abstract.

I don't think, unless they are clinically obese and clearly have a problem which has been diagnosed by a qualified physician, that teenagers (of either gender, just to reinforce my earlier point) should diet. Period

Teenagers, by definition, are not fully mature - they're still growing and developing. You may say that you stopped gaining height at 12, but as pointed out elsewhere, your body continued to change dramatically through the rest of your teen years, even if much of that change was hidden from your eyes. Those key growth years are a time to give the body everything it needs. The worst thing a teenager can do is to restrict intake to try and fit within some arbitrary target on a scale.

I think a fixation with weight and diet is dangerous enough in fully-grown adults, without encouraging similar behaviour in highly vulnerable children.
<HR>


I totally agree and I did not read the OP's posts as indicating that he was dieting, which is why I objected to others' views that he should be aiming for a certain number of calories (which I view as dieting, even if it's a higher caloric intake).
Click to view dg12002's profile Legend 622 posts since
Aug 26, 2003
25. Apr 1, 2006 8:40 AM in response to: ZZenko
Re: Doesn't seem like this adds up..
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ZZenko:
wow.. this has really opened my eyes... thanks to all who replied and disagreed with eachother.. even if my diet is working right for me now.. maybe there are better ones.. I'll try out what fits right<HR>


Dude or Dudette, please go here.

http://www.caloriesperhour.com/[/URL" target="_blank">

Your diet has worked as far as you know so far. Improve your diet and you can improve your performance now but especially for all your future.

Calories Per Hour recommends 1 book for fueling needs, Eat To Live.

http://www.caloriesperhour.com/products_ETL.html[/URL" target="_blank">