active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Login to Reply
1 2 3 4 Previous Next
Click to view CSuzette's profile Legend 290 posts since
Apr 8, 2005

Jul 26, 2006 4:33 PM

Latest Low Carb Research

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/531007_5[/URL" target="_blank">

Conference Coverage: Nutrition and Metabolic Aspects of Carbohydrate Restriction -- 2006 Nutrition and Metabolism Scientific Sessions
Posted 06/21/2006

Heather Hutchins, MS, RD

Introduction
Carbohydrate-restricted diets remain very controversial in both the medical community and the general public. Much of this confusion stems from inconsistencies in defining "carbohydrate-restricted diet." Many nutrition experts present at this conference believe that the current epidemic of metabolic disorders results from insulin overproduction and that this could be partially due to chronic excessive carbohydrate intake. Thus, a major goal of the conference was to provide a forum for discussion of the implications of carbohydrate restriction. In addition, evidence for implementation of carbohydrate-restricted diets and mechanisms to support carbohydrate restriction were summarized. A complete list of the presenters is outlined in Table 1...

Conclusions
The presentations at the Nutritional and Metabolic Aspects of Carbohydrate Restriction Conference support the metabolic benefits of a lower carbohydrate content of the diet. Although not discussed at the conference, recent data indicates carbohydrate-restricted diets work significantly better in those individuals with existing IR and indicate that the metabolic state of the individual may determine which diet is appropriate for maximum weight loss.
48 Identifying genetic markers to target these individuals, and those who may best respond to carbohydrate restricted diets, is emerging from the work of Ruano and colleagues.49

Research suggests that favorable metabolic changes can occur with very low-carbohydrate and/or moderate-carbohydrate restricted diets. Diets involving moderate protein intake can improve glycemic control and blood lipid levels. This suggests that weight loss and metabolic enhancements might be due to the combination of an increased protein intake and restriction of carbohydrate. A diet consisting of 150 g or less of carbohydrate, with 120 g or greater of protein per day is recommended by Layman.50 This moderate diet approach reduces hepatic glucose production and minimizes the excessive secretion of insulin giving rise to improved glycemic control.50 The Women's Health Initiative51 demonstrated that long-term, low-fat diet adherence is difficult for many people. Long-term compliance might improve with higher protein diets that promote satiety, and carbohydrate-restricted diets that improve insulin control. Further research is needed to assess long-term carbohydrate-restricted diet compliance rates as well as long-term alterations in metabolism and enzymatic reactions that occur with carbohydrate-restricted diets.
Click to view bigapplepie's profile We're Not Worthy 2,636 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
1. Jul 26, 2006 4:43 PM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by CSuzette:
The presentations at the Nutritional and Metabolic Aspects of Carbohydrate Restriction Conference...
<HR>

Do you think that they could be a tad biased?
Click to view HSunshine's profile Pro 196 posts since
Sep 15, 2003
2. Jul 26, 2006 5:02 PM in response to: CSuzette
Few people will debate whether low-carb diets can be good for weightloss. Low-carb diets are satieting for fewer calories, so weightloss occurs. For severely overweight/obese individuals, the kind of people that a physician sees, weightloss is paramount.

But that doesn't mean a low-carb diet is good for training. The research cited concerns weightloss, not running. This kind of discussion is better suited for a different board. Previous discussions have yielded a resounding opinion in terms of diet: we don't want anything that would be adversed to running, and all evidence suggests that you needs lots of good carbs to train well.

In other words ... take it to weightwatchers.com and go have fun there!
Click to view 88spencer's profile Amateur 18 posts since
Jul 12, 2006
3. Jul 26, 2006 8:23 PM in response to: CSuzette
I love this board... other that the occasional elitest ****.
The notion that one-diet-fits-all is insane. I struggled for too many years with the bleeping food pyramid and can give personal testimony as to the health benefits of the low-carb diet.
Is it right for everyone? No.
Is a low-fat (aka high-carb) diet right for everyone? No again.
In other words, take it to elitestcrap.com and go have fun there!
Click to view Colormepink's profile Pro 130 posts since
Mar 9, 2006
4. Jul 26, 2006 10:18 PM in response to: CSuzette
It is interesting to hear different opinions on what works and what doesn't. I think we should try to be a little kinder. Have a friendly debate if you will so all of us can hear all sides and choose for ourselves but I do think we should show each other more respect in how we respond. That is just my humble opinion. Stepping off my soap box now. Thanks.
Click to view alyshab's profile Pro 60 posts since
May 11, 2003
5. Jul 26, 2006 11:40 PM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by 88spencer:
I love this board... other that the occasional elitest ****.
The notion that one-diet-fits-all is insane. I struggled for too many years with the bleeping food pyramid and can give personal testimony as to the health benefits of the low-carb diet.
Is it right for everyone? No.
Is a low-fat (aka high-carb) diet right for everyone? No again.
In other words, take it to elitestcrap.com and go have fun there!

<HR>


I don't think any of the replies were spouting 'elitist ****'. Low carb works for you. Excellent. And CSuzette. And TotalEffort.

Posting an article about low carb diets in a message board with runners is going to elicit some responses - if only because the current widely recommended diet for athletes involves a significant amount of carbs.

www.ais.org.au/nutrition[/URL" target="_blank">
www.acsm.org[/URL" target="_blank">

And yes, I'm sure there will be articles somewhere which can point to ares where low carb works better. However until this becomes commonly accepted and promoted amongst the medical fraternity you can expect continued perceived 'elitist ****'.
Click to view kasia055's profile Rookie 7 posts since
Jan 29, 2003
6. Jul 27, 2006 7:55 AM in response to: CSuzette
The problem with these restrictive diets is long term effects. Research has proven that in the long term, people who lost weight using carb-restrictive diets tend to gain it back once they return to their regular eating habits.

The only real way to lose weight and keep it off is through healthy, balanced eating and regular exercise.

Think of what happens once you return to your regular dietary habits.
Click to view have2run's profile Pro 81 posts since
May 22, 2006
7. Jul 27, 2006 9:05 AM in response to: CSuzette
Just wondering how reputable Medscape is. I am accustomed to reading journals such as Science, Nature, or Cell (I am a biochem undergrad). This Medscape seems a little biased and misleading....
Click to view Iontach's profile Legend 1,522 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
8. Jul 27, 2006 9:17 AM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by have2run:
Just wondering how reputable Medscape is. <HR>


It's not a peer-reviewed journal, if that's what you mean. It's a directory.

http://www.medscape.com/pages/public/about/about[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Iontach's profile Legend 1,522 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
10. Jul 27, 2006 9:35 AM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by CSuzette:
And, this paper was presented at a conference for people interested in metabolisms of all types...not just low carb.<HR>


That's not true. It was a conference on carb restriction.

[i]"The 2006 Conference on the Nutritional and Metabolic Aspects of Carbohydrate Restriction aims to integrate recent findings of clinical outcomes with restriction of carbohydrate and the associated regulation of insulin secretion on metabolism." http://www.nmsociety.org/events.htm[/URL" target="_blank">

The sponsors are interesting:
http://www.nmsociety.org/sponsors06.htm[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view wyrobert's profile Amateur 17 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
11. Jul 27, 2006 9:44 AM in response to: CSuzette
Beef, it's whats for training!

quote:<HR>Originally posted by Iontach:

The sponsors are interesting: http://www.nmsociety.org/sponsors06.htm[/URL" target="_blank">
<HR>
Click to view have2run's profile Pro 81 posts since
May 22, 2006
12. Jul 27, 2006 9:46 AM in response to: CSuzette
Not peer-reviewed....

Not interested.
Click to view Iontach's profile Legend 1,522 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
13. Jul 27, 2006 9:55 AM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by have2run:
Not peer-reviewed....

Not interested.
<HR>


But that's not the point of Medscape at all. It's NOT A JOURNAL! It's a long list of what has been published/presented. Think of it like a very unfiltered search on Athens or in Google Scholar. And it's as valuable as either.

It doesn't tell you whether the research was carried out well, it doesn't tell you how exacting the publishing journal is, but it does tell you what's out there.

CSuzette, by her own admission, has no scientific or research training, and laypeople don't always understand the niceties of the research and publication process, or of how one tailors one's conference paper to the conference one submits it to.

Of course, apart from being ranked for inclusion at the conference, conference papers aren't peer-reviewed at all. This is a fact for which I have had occasion to be extremely grateful in the past.
Click to view Laura on a bike099's profile Legend 204 posts since
Feb 22, 2005
14. Jul 27, 2006 10:09 AM in response to: CSuzette
quote:<HR>Originally posted by 88spencer:
I love this board... other that the occasional elitest ****.
The notion that one-diet-fits-all is insane. I struggled for too many years with the bleeping food pyramid and can give personal testimony as to the health benefits of the low-carb diet.
Is it right for everyone? No.
Is a low-fat (aka high-carb) diet right for everyone? No again.
In other words, take it to elitestcrap.com and go have fun there!

<HR>


I think somebody needs a cookie.