active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
20 Replies Last post: Apr 23, 2006 12:26 PM by AndyHass   1 2 Previous Next
Click to view AndyHass's profile Legend 1,385 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
Login to Reply

Apr 17, 2006 1:21 PM

US 25K record "gone"

It appear Meb just bettered the US 25K record (split can't be ratified, can it??) at Boston. The guy is running like a beast. Whatever happens, you can't say he didn't go for it!
Click to view obsessor's profile Legend 488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
1. Apr 17, 2006 1:47 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
and culpepper, sell, and gillmore rounding out some top 10. not so bad.

back to watching.
Click to view obsessor's profile Legend 488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
2. Apr 17, 2006 1:55 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
and a new CR??
Click to view obsessor's profile Legend 488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
3. Apr 17, 2006 2:20 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
yes. phil coppes, 30k, split from TCM, (and course record that day??)

they need to be set up - certified, timing, etc, at splits for it to be ratified, of course.

5 Americans round out top 10 - and three set PR's?! is that right?? How 'bout that Sell?? eh?

There's no doubt Meb went for it. Very, very fast day out there. Who doesn't respect that?
Click to view DHornbeck's profile Pro 61 posts since
Feb 22, 2005
5. Apr 17, 2006 4:25 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
ljwood, a CW regular, posted a 2:35, which I believe is a 7 minute PR for him

Andy, I'm sure you probably already know this, but I saw that Kevin Pline went 2:36, which isn't a PR (i think), but a great race none-the-less.
Click to view maryt091's profile Legend 806 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
7. Apr 18, 2006 5:56 AM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
It certainly was great to see so many Americans in the top 10 foir a change. It was a great day for racing. Mr T and I were just before mile 20, and we were cold with the wind in our faces most of the day, so it must have been a nice tailwind at that point for the runners and temps right around 50. I'm not surprised a course record was set.
Click to view ahmusely's profile Expert 53 posts since
Jan 10, 2006
8. Apr 18, 2006 9:51 AM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
so apparently Spira shoes won't be giving away their million bucks? hmmm oh darn magic shoes aren't the answer to everyone's running careers.
Click to view Fine Whine's profile Amateur 10 posts since
Dec 23, 2004
9. Apr 20, 2006 11:44 AM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
Wah, wah, wah. With all the wondering about whether en route times can count, you are all over looking that Meb's split can't be ratified because A, it's point to point a B, there's a hugely illegal 400+ foot drop between the start and the 25K point, which is one of the lowest parts of the whole course. Legal would be an almost loop and a drop of no more than 25 meters or 80 or so feet. 1/5 of the actual drop.
Click to view obsessor's profile Legend 488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
11. Apr 20, 2006 4:11 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Fine Whine:
Wah, wah, wah. With all the wondering about whether en route times can count, you are all over looking that Meb's split can't be ratified because A, it's point to point a B, there's a hugely illegal 400+ foot drop between the start and the 25K point, which is one of the lowest parts of the whole course. Legal would be an almost loop and a drop of no more than 25 meters or 80 or so feet. 1/5 of the actual drop.<HR>


Records can be set on point-to-point courses if they can prove that it was not wind assisted. (not the same as closed loop and the near-loop rule) Yes, the drop makes it ineligible in this case. That's a point. Most courses, even if eligible, are not set up to record or accept an attempt at a record by split. Sometimes, rarely, they are. 'K?
Click to view obsessor's profile Legend 488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
13. Apr 21, 2006 10:48 AM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
...and H.G. in AZ this January for his H.M. WR attempt. (20k split cert.) Also - this was not a closed loop.
Click to view Fine Whine's profile Amateur 10 posts since
Dec 23, 2004
14. Apr 21, 2006 6:25 PM in response to: AndyHass
Re: US 25K record "gone"
quote:<HR>Originally posted by AndyHass:
Next time you could try posting the information without the juvenile intro...people will take you a lot more seriously.<HR>


WAH, WAH, WAH.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by obsessor:
...and H.G. in AZ this January for his H.M. WR attempt. (20k split cert.) Also - this was not a closed loop.<HR>


Wah, wah, wah. To pick nits - I didn't say a course has to be a closed loop to be record eligible. I used the term "almost-loop" although that is misleading too. As long as the distance between the start and finish lines does not exceed 30% of the race distance and the elevation standard is met, the course is golden. As you said - if the separation's greater than that and someone runs an apparent record, there has to be evidence that there was no significant tailwind for at least half of the race (and I don't know what "significant" is, I am just going by USATF rules).