active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view cowardlylion's profile Pro 107 posts since
Feb 1, 2006
15. May 3, 2006 10:56 AM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
For Olympic/World champion 1500m runners, 1:46 is slow. That was Abdi Bile's split for the last 800 when he won the '87 worlds. I had a college teammate who ran 1:46.00 and was a pretty good XC runner (ran even with guys like Fred Keiser) but simply could never beat Paul McMullen in the 1500, let alone the guys McMullen ran against in the Olympics. Webb is on a complete different level than either of those two, but his basic speed might not be better than Geb's in his prime. And if El G has at times seemed short on sprinting ability in races without a rabbit, where does that put Webb? On the other hand, if you took Kennedy in his prime and gave him 1:46 speed, then you've got a runner that the Africans might fear. Someone like, say, Dieter Baumann, the '92 Olympic 5k champ. And those are exactly the qualities Webb has shown so far.

Re: sprinters, hurdlers and quarter-milers. I didn't mean to denigrate US athletes in those events. I did mean to emphasize that our depth in those events is connected to our depth in the sprints.

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
16. May 3, 2006 11:32 AM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Desert Tortoise,
I accepted you challenge and reread your original post and still saw the same thing. Your exact quote was; "...have enjoyed watching him turn himself from a high school has been into such an excellent runner" Now you want to change your tune and say; "garbage on the internet" said that he was a has been. Which one is it? Also, I'd say he was a little better than a "potentially great high school runner". With Ritz I'd say argueably the best combo to come out of high school together ever.
Click to view PacerChris's profile Legend 763 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
17. May 3, 2006 12:58 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
I'm just glad there's something in US Track & Field that is worth talking about, other than sprinters who may/may not be doing illegal substances and who often display themselves quite poorly to the rest of the world (a la Sydney's relay team's display after winning).

It's been very interesting watching Webb the last several years - I used to live in NoVa so I had heard about him when he was a freshman or sophomore. From his Olympics disaster he decided THAT wasn't going to happen again and he certainly was aggressive at Worlds...I get the sense that he's putting things together and learning how to race, and I love that he tries different events. He certainly has some talent and I hope he and Ritz will compete with the world - Webb from 1500/5000 and Ritz 10,000/marathon? - with the two of them meeting every now and then in 5 and 10k events.

------------------
Pacer Dude[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view megapronator's profile Legend 280 posts since
Nov 6, 2000
18. May 3, 2006 2:53 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
quote:<HR>Originally posted by laker:
(Webb) With Ritz I'd say argueably the best combo to come out of high school together ever.<HR>


Don't forget the 3rd member of the "big 3" from that year was Ryan Hall, who now running great as well after years of injury problems. Hopefully this will start to put an end to all the comments that successful high school runners burn out, and they shouldn't train so hard when they are young. Far more unsuccessful, low mileage runners give up the sport or fail to move on to great things than guys that work hard at 15-16 years old and have success to build from.

------------------
About Me[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view cowardlylion's profile Pro 107 posts since
Feb 1, 2006
19. May 3, 2006 3:02 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Were Ryun and Lindgren in the same graduating class? I know they were both in HS when they made the '64 Olympic team. If so, that's a hard pair to beat.
Click to view cowardlylion's profile Pro 107 posts since
Feb 1, 2006
20. May 3, 2006 3:04 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Edit- they were both class of '64. Until both these guys set WRs, they're behind!

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
21. May 4, 2006 10:41 AM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
QUOTEOriginally posted by Desert Tortoise:
Well, laker, I'm not sure what to say. No one else is having the comprehension problems you seem to be having with what I've written so I'm guessing my incredible stupidity is evident only to you or maybe, just maybe, my statements are really not so far off the mark.

I guess I'm not sure how you would place his first year after Michigan cross-country into that "nice progression" you claim existed in the wake of his high school successes, but I have clear memories of him getting beaten, and beaten badly, by a bunch of D2 and D3 college runners in an 800. He showed little speed but a great deal of poise then, and I've been nothing but glad to see him running so well after struggling so much.
[/QUOTE

DT,
He's 23 years old, I would call some of his earlier problems growing pains, nobody progresses on a straight line forever. He has had a **** of alot of success already.In no way does any of his travails qualify him as a "high school has been".I don't think I'm having trouble comprehending you at all:You threw out a crazy comment and then don't have the guts to stand behind it, later attributing it to "garbage on the internet". I do, however, agree with most everything else from this thread.
Click to view captainwildcat's profile Legend 276 posts since
Aug 18, 2007
22. May 4, 2006 1:36 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Laker you really are not understanding what DT said about Webb being a High school has been (not that DT needs me to defend him, but I'm going to do it anyway). At the point DT saw him race in person Webb WAS a high school has been. He had the potential to be great pro as we are now seeing, but at that time that's all it was - potential. For about 2 years after High School his performances were no where near what they had been in HS and a lot of folks had written him off as someone who had peaked at 18 and would never be heard from again. Obviously, he has proven those naysayers wrong and no one in their right mind would call him a HS has been now.

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view RTCRUNR's profile Legend 396 posts since
May 25, 2002
23. May 4, 2006 2:23 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Up next for Webb is a two-mile against a fairly solid field - http://www.adidastrackclassic.com/2006/news5-4-06.htm[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view milkbaby004's profile Legend 464 posts since
Jul 28, 2003
24. May 4, 2006 9:52 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Laker, you need to read the last three years worth of letsrun.com posts about Webb to understand that in general, many track fans considered him a "high school has-been". It isn't something that DTortoise just made up. Definitely, a lot of fans expected big things from the guy, but there were a few years where things were definitely not going well for him.

The times that Webb, Ritz, and Fam ran should be exciting for American distance fans. I would agree that Fam's race was probably the most exciting, especially the way he was closing on the other two.
Click to view rhoon phast's profile Legend 236 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
25. May 4, 2006 10:52 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Desert Tortoise is accurately passing on the general sense of the forums over that time period. In my opinion, based on my own browsing. It seems crazy now because of the fantastic level of Webb's performances at every level in the past couple years, but he had a couple years where he didn't match even his high school times and people (perhaps the vocal few, but that's not the sense I got...) had in many cases written him off. Thankfully, he's back on track and running times most of us (all of us?) can only dream about.

------------------
Troy[/URL" target="_blank">

Running resume[/URL" target="_blank">

My running log[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
26. May 5, 2006 11:20 AM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Okay everybody, I'll accept that alot of people called Webb a high school has been. In my mind it's crazy. How in the world can you pass summary judgement on a 21 year old? His kind of talent can't just disappear. Barring catastrophic injury it had to come back. I guess its symtomatic of Americans "what have you done for me lately" attitudes. By the way what about Geb in London? 9th place! Now there's a has been. I'm sure he'll never run fast again.
Click to view rhoon phast's profile Legend 236 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
27. May 5, 2006 12:44 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
Just for giggles, I went over to letsrun and did a search on 'Webb washed up' and got an insane number of threads as search results. They include the 'he's washed up' threads as well as the 'well, you all said he's washed up, but now he's dropping 3:48 miles' threads. Kind of funny, really.

I think that Geb is different for a few reasons. First, he ran a 2:09 marathon. That alone qualifies as not washed up, just a rough day (for him). Second, he ran that after a build-up phase where he set a couple world records. Third, he seems to have a fan following that is very devoted as a result of his extensive and fantastic career, including both his consistency and longevity. I would argue that the expectations people have for Geb in the marathon are, to this point, a bit over the top in relation to his marathon achievements versus those of his competition.

------------------
Troy[/URL" target="_blank">

Running resume[/URL" target="_blank">

My running log[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view captainwildcat's profile Legend 276 posts since
Aug 18, 2007
28. May 7, 2006 12:44 PM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
quote:<HR>Originally posted by laker:
Okay everybody, I'll accept that alot of people called Webb a high school has been. In my mind it's crazy. How in the world can you pass summary judgement on a 21 year old? His kind of talent can't just disappear. Barring catastrophic injury it had to come back.<HR>


There are lots of HS phenoms who do exceptional things as 17-18 year olds in all sports and then are never heard from again. The talent might still be there, but it just doesn't manifest itself after HS, or the athlete simply never gets any better. Do you remember a kid named Obea Moore? He ran world class 400m times (45.14) and almost made the Olympic team in '96 as a high schooler. Then he got injured, had some academic problems and was basically never heard from again. When Webb had a few bad years after HS, including an injury and leaving Michigan a lot of people thought he would never reach that level again. Like I said before Webb has proven those people wrong and I'm am glad he has, but it was certainly not a given that he would ever regain his form or get any better than he was in HS.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by laker:

I guess its symtomatic of Americans "what have you done for me lately" attitudes. By the way what about Geb in London? 9th place! Now there's a has been. I'm sure he'll never run fast again.
<HR>


Please tell me you aren't serious about this! Geb is a totally different case. First of all, Geb has proven himself so many times over that even if he retired today no one would really remember his 9th at London. Also, Geb is older and doubtlessly close to retirement within a few years. If he never wins another race or never breaks another WR (I think he'll do more of both by BTW) people would not say that he wasted his talent or potential as would have been said about Webb if he hadn't rebounded from his problems after HS.

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
29. May 8, 2006 10:45 AM in response to: dmichaelp
Re: Webb d. Ritz
quote:<HR>Originally posted by captainwildcat:
Please tell me you aren't serious about this! Geb is a totally different case. First of all, Geb has proven himself so many times over that even if he retired today no one would really remember his 9th at London. Also, Geb is older and doubtlessly close to retirement within a few years. If he never wins another race or never breaks another WR (I think he'll do more of both by BTW) people would not say that he wasted his talent or potential as would have been said about Webb if he hadn't rebounded from his problems after HS.

<HR>


I was being sarcastic.