gripperm, in your meandering, tangential, and semi-coherent insults, you completely miss the point I am making and offer none of your own. Here is the division of boards on this website as it currently stands:
- Newbies
- Basic Training
- Running on the track
- Running ultras and on the trail
- Multisport
- A Jeff Galloway shill board
- Racing
- Racing competitively
- Teenagers
- Boomers
- Injuries
- Nutrition
- Gear
The boards are divided up by distance, experience, seriousness (those who race versus those who run for enjoyment), age groups and peripheral issues (nutrition, gear). Where exactly do larger runners fit in? What proportion of them post on the board designated for new runners? What portion of your own posts are focused on your elephantine girth and what portion are focused on running? How much time could you possibly spend discussing these putatively unique challenges?
Granted, heavier runners are a group, but there are a lot of groups on this board. Running for heavy runners is simply not a sufficiently broad topic to merit its own board, just as the study of zebras, for example, is subsumed by biology and is not its own discipline. Every single one of the issues you speak of are dealt with on existing boards (Gear, Newbie Cafe, Carbo Canteen).
If you insist that clydesdales merit their own group, where does it stop? There are probably more people on this website trying to qualify for Boston than there are over 250 lbs. Would there be a Boston Qualifying forum? What about a 40-minute 10k? They have their own thread, and it's pretty popular.
http://This message has been edited by aurang (edited Jan-16-2007).