active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
25 Replies Last post: Jun 29, 2007 1:01 PM by rbbmoose   Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next
Click to view fredurie's profile Legend 1,979 posts since
Aug 21, 2002
15. Jun 28, 2007 10:48 AM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
To be truthful I probably ran this way in the winter of 92-93 at 45-46 but
some of my runs were almost all out hammers from Burlington to
Mississauga, Canada.
Click to view RunstheBitterroot's profile Legend 591 posts since
Aug 14, 2007
16. Jun 28, 2007 12:19 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
Hi Tramps, nice artical. I read those things with great admiration for folks who are able to work that hard especially as they age. I have to remind myself that it took a number of years for most runners to be really good at it, and certainly natural ability comes into play there too. Right now and in the forseable future I have to severly limit my hard workouts or I lose my milage and looking at what happend this last winter watching my pace and distance drop for a givin heartrate made it clear that what I was doing wasn't working. I believe, though there is no proof, that when I am able to maintain consistant decent weekly milage that eventually I will be able to work harder during some of my runs. So what do I do in the interim? I suppose I will just keep cranking out the miles and continue to admire those who have put all those miles in the bank.

Larry

------------------
"If you see a man running up a mountain trail in Montana with a fly pole attached to his back, you are probably lost. LDD
Click to view JPGarland's profile Legend 775 posts since
Dec 7, 2007
17. Jun 28, 2007 1:20 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
I guess running 3 quality runs a week plus 2 or 3 cross-training things is better than getting injured. But I'm with Fred and Jim (both of whom are on the 50+ page) and Nick (who I assume is over 50 given when he did his PR) that there's no substitute for running or for mileage. After 20 months since my last disabling injury, I've been waiting for a while for the other shoe to drop and get my next one, but it hasn't happened. So for me I do 6 days a week with at least one speedworkout and one long run. Pace is slower than it used to be, but I'm having more of a problem going too fast than too slow across all my runs. Fred's point about recovering is well-taken.

Also, while I keep track of age-group placings, my focus is on Age-Graded percentages, which are less arbitrary (but I'm not complaining about age-group awards).
Click to view perchcreek's profile Legend 821 posts since
Aug 15, 2007
18. Jun 28, 2007 1:37 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
Thanks Tramps,
I started thinking about this when my Triathlete friend ran a nice first marathon with much lower mileage than I would have recoemmended. But he did lots of other workouts like biking, swimming and weights and got quite fit and his endurance was good. Most of his running was low HR stuff. 12 min pace but he had some good MP 16 milers. He targeted 3:45 and hit 3:45.

Since I went the high milage roue and kept PRing and kept getting injured, I've now been in re-hab for 3 months. But all the water running, swimming, elliptical and spinning have kept endurance up nicely.
Click to view Rich in NH's profile Legend 426 posts since
Dec 10, 2007
19. Jun 28, 2007 1:52 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
I've got a buddy who's into this and tells me I run too much.

I've read the schedule, it lays out the 3 hard days a week, then says runners are encouraged to cross train OR run easy on the off days.

To me, this is more smoke screen than anything else. They claim you're only running 3 days a week, then "encourage" you to run easy the other 3 days...
Click to view Canfit's profile Legend 1,056 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
20. Dec 23, 2007 2:59 AM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
Some interesting discussion here. Some random thoughts ...

As a latecomer to distance running, I began running 3-4 days a week 4 years ago, averaging about 30-35 miles per week at peak for my first marathon. During the first 3 years, I stuck to the same basic program (running with a group) but showed very little progress relative to marathon finishning time - always in the 4:15 - 4:30 range for 5 marathons. We did long runs, hills, track work, but in hindsight I don't think it was very 'controlled' relative to "pacing" that was right for me. I also came to the conclusion that my mileage was too low to achieve the results I would like. (I admit that I was still having a blast!)

During the last year, I decided to up my mileage somewhat to see what impact it would have on my finishing time. I progressed slowly to average 45 mpw at peak which translated to an improvement of 15 mins in my last 2 marathons. It could have been greater ...I just didn't run a very smart marathon this spring despite a PR. I'm sure there were other factors involved, but mileage in my mind was the key one to improving my time.

However, I still think my mileage is too low and that my running is at the wrong paces. My plan for my fall marathon is to average 55 mpw at peak. However, 80-90% of these miles will be 'slow' at a Daniels defined VDOT pace of 10:10. This is much slower than most of my earlier long/easy runs. At the same time, I will be doing more 'controlled' speed work than I've done in the past, min 2X per week involving MP (8:47) and LT pace(8:12) - again, Daniels suggested paces. I've also been able to increase my running days to 5 from 4 and following the hard/easy rule, seem to be recovering quite well with 2 days rest. I will be interested to see what the output of all this translates to on race day.

Maybe because I only started 4 years ago (at 53) that I can still get faster before getting slower (or maybe again I've already peaked). To me, it's certainly worth a shot to see if I can get faster first. My primary goal is always to get to the start line uninjured and continue to enjoy the journey and my running buddies.

One last thing ...there really are 3 stages in life - youth, middle age and ....'gee you're looking good today!'
PJ

http://This message has been edited by Canfit (edited Jun-28-2007).
Click to view Nordic Berserker's profile Pro 190 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
21. Jun 28, 2007 3:14 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
It looks like the Furhman study is here to stay. It does cover the basics, and you can maintain a decent level of fitness off of 3 days a week of training, but the program is probably not optimal if you want to keep improving in performance or to maximize your efforts. Moreover, If you are either cross training on the opposite days, or running easy, then what's new? From what I've seen as a runner, coach, and student of the sport, athletes improve linearly with increased mileage through at least 40-50 miles per week. After that the benefits do taper but in general, but many runners can keep up the volume and continue to flourish with twice that.

What I've done in middle age is to actually increase mileage compared to my late 20s and 30s, while decreasing the intensity and frequency of speed work and interval training. I try to do just enough of that to keep sharp, while making sure that I'm recovered enough for races, where to me, it counts. So interestingly, my training now is a lot more like off season or early season training when I was in my early to mid 20s. It seems to work.

Ideally during the season, I like to build up to 50-70 miles per week, with a rest day every 6-10 days. Most of the mileage is very aerobic, but I'll do between 20 and 40 minutes of tempo training a week, 12-20 minutes at V02 max, and only 3-6 minutes of intervals or striders at mile pace. This formula has worked really well from the mile to 30k; marathons have proven to be tougher.

In sum, I've been there (late 30s in particular) and if I cut back to 3 days a week, even with a bit of cross training, my race times would slow by 10-15 sec per mile.
Click to view tww9094's profile Amateur 26 posts since
May 8, 2007
22. Dec 23, 2007 2:59 AM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
I stick to the tww9094 plan....run.......... everyday....because...well....I like to run everyday....a nice little byproduct is not missing any days since 05/02/02 and only 26 total days since I turned 30....17 years ago next month....I have a ways to go before I break my best streak of 3,155 consecutive days without missing.....only at 1,881 consecutive days at the moment....I run 11.3 miles a day at about a 7:54 average pace and still solo 26.2 from time to time...last one a 3:27:12 in April....a BQ time for my age....we all slow....I may never sub3 again like I have 8 times but who cares....I could still manage around a 3:05-3:10. Running is the journey...racing is just icing on the cake....I am not looking for a way to run less....if anything I may be looking for a way to run more. I think that article might have applied to others. I have never had a running related injury since starting in 1980....I have heard of shin splints....they sound painful.....I run 80 miles a week....should end the year at about 4,100 give or take a few miles....have only gone under 3,000 miles twice since 1990....2001 (2,746.0) and 2002 (2,537.9).....I understand I am not the norm....but there are others out there that put in very high mileage at very good paces year in and year out....and love it...even the miles that hurt. I plant solo 50K and then step up to 35 miles and of course 50 milers.....doubt I will do any 100 milers....I do not like to walk....my attitude is of course quantity and you can still do quality also.
Week=81.3
MTD=325.7
YTD=2,027.0
LTD=66,183.4


------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

http://This message has been edited by tww9094 (edited Jun-28-2007).
Click to view tww9094's profile Amateur 26 posts since
May 8, 2007
23. Jun 28, 2007 7:58 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
I like what long Run Nick said for a goal....besting his first from 30 years ago.....my first was more than 24 years ago...I probably could not best my 2:54 PR.....but I think I would have a shot at my 3:03 debut from January of '84.
Click to view Canfit's profile Legend 1,056 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
24. Jun 28, 2007 9:12 PM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tww9094:
I stick to the tww9094 plan....run.......... everyday....because...well....I like to run everyday<HR>

That's quite a achievement and you are very unique. You obviously have a great passion for running. Continued good luck with your "streak"!

I'm constantly amazed at the wide range of individual running talent and abilities of those posting on this CR thread. The really good thing is that I've learned so much from both experienced and less experienced runners alike. Everyone has some unique 'wisdom' to offer.

tww9094 - post often and share a little of what you've learned over the years. I'm sure you have some gems!
PJ
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
25. Dec 23, 2007 2:59 AM in response to: Tramps031
Re: "Running Safely Into Middle Age"
Yes - an interesting range of replies.. I'm fairly sure I would be injured less with cross-training days but I'm not convinced that it would optimize my marathon performance.

I'm a few months older than tww9094 (47) - with similar PRs but still not willing to admit my PRs are a thing of the past... Part of that may be coming to the running thing late at age 32. I really believe I could go sub 2:40 if I could get a couple of years without injury - but so far it hasn't happened and I've become an expert in stress fractures instead.

Like tww9094 - I love to run - and racing is icing on the cake. I think I could be a decent 5K runner, but the whole racing thing for me is not big of a thrill. I'm truly enjoy the training more than the actual competition and marathon has highest ratio of prep to racing.

We're all an experiment of one, but I'll stubbornly keep trying to outrun father time for a couple more years...


Ray

http://This message has been edited by rbbmoose (edited Jun-29-2007).