10.
Sep 4, 2007 9:02 AM

in response to:
Rita_C
Re: This forum
This forum will obviously take some getting used to, if it does replace eteamz.
I've been with eteamz since its Team Discovery days almost ten years ago (even though my "Member Since" date shows July 00, I have hard-copy threads from 1998 that I printed when I first started umpiring), and have done the overwhelming majority of my posting on that venue. I also post on the llumpire forum in Yahoo Groups on occasion. I have visited a number of other forums, such as the Officials forum, but never did much on them, mainly because I'm most comfortable with the people on eteamz and the format of its threads.
A few things I don't like with this forum:
1. There's no "Top of Page" link on the messages to get back to the task bar to return to the message lists.
2. The little "in response to" link doesn't really help. If a Michael Taylor message says it's "in response to: BHanlon", but Brian has five messages above Mike's, how do you know which one he responded to, other than by clicking the link? Hard to track as you're reading the threads.
3. Too many links. If I see that Mark S posted a response to my initial discussion, and I click "Mark S", I go to his profile instead of his response. Just a little annoying, that's all.
4. Keeping track of my responses is tough. Let's say I responded to a post by Mason Dixon Blue and asked him a question. On eteamz, I could quickly find my post because it would be under a post by MDB, and would have the question mark icon. But here, I would have to remember not only which discussion MDB's original post was under--did he post his original in "Ball Hit Bat Twice" or "Rule Clarification", for example--but then find the right MDB post with my question after it.
Again, I'm sure once I get used to it, this place will be okay. But I strongly adhere to the "If it Ain't Broke" philosophy. I honestly don't know what was wrong with the eteamz discussion board that the powers-that-be felt the need to start this place.
Manny