active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
7 Replies Last post: Jul 27, 2007 1:54 PM by kcwoodhead  
Click to view kcwoodhead's profile Legend 355 posts since
Oct 18, 2007
Login to Reply

Dec 25, 2007 3:58 PM

Marathon Question

Burning question: is is just supposed to hurt from mile 1?

Now, I'll go back and give my reason for asking that question: I'm slow. My marathon PR is 5:12 and I've run 5 (5:12, 5:16, 5:21, 5:22, 5:55).

Recently, my little group has tried to be more in-tune with our long run pace. Everything you read says you should run .5-1.5 min/mile slower than your goal marathon pace. My goal is 5 hours...always has been. That is a 11:27min/mile pace. I feel like 13:00 min/mile is way too slow and wonder how in the world I could train at 13 and race at 11:27. We usually average between 11:30-12:00 for out long runs, usually closer to the 12:00 average. I also do a 9/1 run/walk (run 9 minutes, walk 1).

So, say I keep training at that same pace, when I show up at the start line of Chicago in 2 months, do I automatically have to start slightly out of my comfort zone and just hope I stay there? This is a new concept to me, and it has just recently dawned on me that faster runners really have to step out of their comfort zone from the start (i.e. someone whose goal pace is 7:00 min/mile who has been training at 7.5-9 min/mile will no doubt not be in their comfort zone running 7 min/mile).

Also, I have read that it isn't your long run that makes you faster, but your speed work and tempo runs and stuff like that. What does everyone feel about that? I just finished a weekly track circuit and I will do hills for the next 5 weeks, then back to track for about 4 more weeks.

Sorry this is so long - I guess I'm just lost and really want to figure how to get under that magical 5 hour mark that has eluded me for so long!



http://This message has been edited by kcwoodhead (edited Jul-27-2007).
Click to view jroden's profile Legend 1,683 posts since
Dec 11, 2007
2. Jul 27, 2007 11:27 AM in response to: kcwoodhead
Re: Marathon Question
I think at your pace you have a different set of rules of thumb regarding pace. You need to go out and run for a few hours in training to get your body used to switching over to fat metabolism and cause the adaptation required for long bouts of running. I'd think a 13 minute mile is a pace where you might be almost walking, so that wouldn't make a lot of sense.

In the final analysis, you might be better off spending some time after your marathon working on a progression to gain speed over shorter distance races, say 5 milers and after a year or so you would have the speed to get the marathon training done more efficiently. I don't think your terminal goal is getting good at running 5 hour marathons, but rather getting good at running and stepping up to the marathon from time to time, but that's just a guess on my part.
Click to view kristine25's profile Legend 632 posts since
Aug 17, 2007
3. Jul 27, 2007 11:32 AM in response to: kcwoodhead
Re: Marathon Question
KC;

I just posted a similar question (pace of long runs) today and have got some great responses. You should take a look at it. I will say that over the last 6 months I have incorporated speed work in my training in getting prepared for HIM and it has made a HUGE difference in my race times, but I can only gague 5k's really since it's been all sprint tri's. But my HIM run time was great too, just 10 minutes slower than my stand alone HM so I definilty think the speed work has made me faster.
Click to view DONSKIMAN's profile Legend 277 posts since
Nov 25, 2007
4. Jul 27, 2007 11:35 AM in response to: kcwoodhead
Re: Marathon Question
No, it's not supposed to hurt from mile 1.

It looks like you need to add some goal pace running within your long runs. Maybe something like this. 16 mile run with the first three at 1:00 over goal pace, then next 10 at goal pace, then the last 3 at 1:00 over. Other methods are to run the last 1/3 of your long runs at goal pace.

Your run/walk method may also be a problem because it forces you to run faster than goal pace, then take a minute for recovery. That may not be enough recovery for the harder running and over 26.2 miles you are forced to slow down to compensate. It might be more effective to run at a pace you can maintain without the need for walk breaks.

------------------
Don
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view kristine25's profile Legend 632 posts since
Aug 17, 2007
6. Jul 27, 2007 11:58 AM in response to: kcwoodhead
Re: Marathon Question
KC;

Don't forget all that IM training is sure to have a HUGE impact on our standalone. Remember, you are IRONMAN!!!