active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
69 Replies Last post: Nov 7, 2007 9:49 AM by clasko2596   1 2 3 ... 5 Previous Next
Click to view 3chilipeppers's profile Legend 696 posts since
Nov 3, 2007
Login to Reply

Nov 5, 2007 9:30 PM

No ipod enforcement

My HM in Feb. says no ipods. How do they enforce it? What if you run with one? I know many races are doing this, but I just run faster with my ipod!

Kelli
Click to view Crazy1004's profile Community Moderator 1,039 posts since
Jan 29, 2006
1. Nov 5, 2007 9:36 PM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
yeah Ipods are a great way to snub other races. It is downright rude and dangerous.

Jeeze I thought roadies were stuck up.

------------------

"Like you did as a child, take the quiet path, the scenic route. Pedal the back roads, slip through the neighborhoods. Suck in the sharp air.
Smell the trees...."

Mark Jenkins
My User Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

They didn’t know my shoulder was broken so I just kept riding

People don't Understand how hard it is to win a bike race...That my problem...I make it look easy
Click to view pcsronbo006's profile Legend 1,584 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
2. Nov 5, 2007 9:48 PM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
more and more the stupid people have done stupid things and more and more races are now actually enforcing the no-ipod rule. Usually a course marshall with DQ you and/or time penalty. Depends on the race though.

maybe they should run with scissors... no wait, that's a bad idea
Click to view tri_coach06's profile Legend 662 posts since
Aug 14, 2007
3. Nov 6, 2007 5:29 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
I see no problem with it. As long as you don't have the volume at max and your not doing 10 minute miles in the front coral.

I know all the bad things about running with music. The argument is as old as the hills. Point being if you want to hear music I really don't have a problem.

S
Click to view LookiLoo's profile Legend 265 posts since
Feb 3, 2006
4. Nov 6, 2007 8:15 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
Kelli - I used to run with headsets on all of my training runs (not races, though), and one day I just decided to try a long run without it. I think I had become so dependent on music that it kept me from really focusing on my breathing, pace, etc., but I really dreaded those longer miles without music.

Ever since I left my MP3 player home that one day, I have yet to use them. It really makes such a huge difference, and I now have no desire to run with music. I didn't realize how meditative running could actually become and now I'm a little pi$$ed I waited so long to give it up! I still use it when I'm on the trainer as that is just mind-numbing, but never when I'm running. I love the silence now!
Click to view DawnT071's profile Legend 713 posts since
Oct 31, 2006
5. Nov 6, 2007 8:41 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
You can probably get away with it, but I would suggest you leave it at home. I run with music all the time in training, but I don't use it in races. It's against the rules and I think we should follow those rules. Simple as that.
Click to view kristine25's profile Legend 632 posts since
Aug 17, 2007
6. Nov 6, 2007 8:49 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
I am right there with you Kelli. The arguement about iPod's are as old as iPods are but if you pay attention to the world around you while also listening to music then who cares?? We listen to music while we drive, does that make us bad drivers?? People who are deaf run, does that mean they shouldn't be in races??

I ALWAYS listen to music when I run, and have done so in ALL my run races, except my last 10K which had a huge time goal for me and I really wanted to concnetrate on where I was at in this race and I was shocked to realize I didn't miss it so I won't use it for my upcoming HM but honestly, I can't even imagine a solo training run without one.
Click to view prosim25019's profile Amateur 34 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
7. Nov 6, 2007 8:57 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
I know one race that enforced the no headphones rule, the Applefest HalfMarathon in New Hampshire...they even had a DQ list one the results page...
http://www.coolrunning.com/results/07/nh/Oct6_Applef_set1.shtml[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view LeftRightRepeat's profile Legend 1,618 posts since
Aug 16, 2007
8. Nov 6, 2007 9:10 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
Without arguing the merit of rules about wearing headphones during running... I think the rules should be enforced. Otherwise, it's unfair to those who follow the rules and, perhaps, sacrifice some performance (or at least think they do) to comply.

If you break the rules, you're cheating and you should be disqualified.

------------------
->>> John[/URL" target="_blank"> <<<-
Go write something in the
Newbie Wiki[/URL" target="_blank">!!
Running Club[/URL" target="_blank"> Tri Club[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view hobey014's profile Legend 1,056 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
9. Nov 6, 2007 11:14 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
No argument for or against. I train with music but have never raced with it. I'm with everyone who says follow the rules but it doesn't bother me either way.

Grandma's Marathon went through all the start corrals last summer and confiscated iPods. They mailed them back to the owners at the owner's expense.
Click to view jroden's profile Legend 1,683 posts since
Dec 11, 2007
10. Nov 6, 2007 11:16 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
Athletes need to understand the rules that govern their sport and follow the special prohibitions that promoters may put in place for an event. Part of the athlete's lifestyle is adhering to this fairly minimal standard of conduct.

One can't have it both ways, if the race organization is to provide all finishers with traffic control, water, a funtioning finish line (remember, 5 hour marathons with closed courses are a fairly new invention) then all athletes, including back of the packers need to hold up their end of the bargain.
Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 386 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
11. Nov 6, 2007 11:27 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
quote:<HR>Originally posted by hobey:
Grandma's Marathon went through all the start corrals last summer and confiscated iPods. They mailed them back to the owners at the owner's expense.<HR>


I commend Grandma's for doing that, but why should the race management have to endure going through that process.

I would have accidentally put them where the trash detail would have thrown them out.

Dear runner,

Gee, we're sorry but the only thing we can think of is that the trash guys threw out your device by mistake.

Sorry, for the irony of this note.

regards from the guys that set the rules.
Click to view triandstopme044's profile Legend 1,454 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
12. Nov 6, 2007 11:28 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
In the tri I was volunteer ref for, we were definitely marking down runners with headsets. I'd have to check the results to see if they were DQ'd or merely had a time penalty, but they were definitely penalized. (Personally, I think the most effective way to penalize folks for this would be to confiscate the MP3 players like nail clippers at the airport... like they did at Grandma's, but without returning them.

With all your hard training, I can't imagine you'd ever break the rules by cutting the course to get a faster time. And yet, you're clearly saying you'd like to break the rules for a faster time if only you won't get caught.
Click to view LeftRightRepeat's profile Legend 1,618 posts since
Aug 16, 2007
13. Dec 25, 2007 6:18 PM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
quote:<HR>Originally posted by jroden:
Athletes need to understand the rules that govern their sport and follow the special prohibitions that promoters may put in place for an event.<HR>


Just to clarify, it's not the promoters. The USATF, the sanctioning body for most running races in the US, this year revised rule 144.3(b) to read: "The visible possession or use by athletes of video or audio cassette recorders or players, TV's, CD or DVD players, radio transmitters or receivers, mobile phones, computers, or any similar devices in the competition area shall not be permitted."

USAT's rules 5.8 (bike) and 6.3 (run) are similar: "Any participants who any time uses, wears or carries a headset, radio, headphones, personal audio device, or any other item described in Section 3.4(i) shall be assessed a variable time penalty."

http://This message has been edited by LeftRightRepeat (edited Nov-06-2007).
Click to view biketm's profile Legend 454 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
14. Nov 6, 2007 11:30 AM in response to: 3chilipeppers
Re: No ipod enforcement
quote:<HR>Originally posted by LookiLoo:
[b]Kelli - I used to run with headsets on all of my training runs (not races, though), and one day I just decided to try a long run without it. I think I had become so dependent on music that it kept me from really focusing on my breathing, pace, etc., but I really dreaded those longer miles without music.

Ever since I left my MP3 player home that one day, I have yet to use them. It really makes such a huge difference, and I now have no desire to run with music. I didn't realize how meditative running could actually become and now I'm a little pi$$ed I waited so long to give it up! I still use it when I'm on the trainer as that is just mind-numbing, but never when I'm running. I love the silence now![/b]<HR>



I could tell the exact same story....I love running sooooo much more without the distracting music.

Tim
Go to original post 1 2 3 ... 5 Previous Next