two points.....
1. through a loophole, food companies are allowed to claim "0 trans fats" on labels even if a product contains hydrogenated oils. i'm not sure what the exact regulation states, but basically the food can contain some trans fats and still claim zero. this is just another of the millions of examples of how our goverment is impotent.
2. just like every other issue, there are studies supporting both sides. one side is like the posters say here, that trans fats, in any quantity, are "pure evil". there are also numerous studies saying they are not worse than "regular" saturated fats. my thought is, they are both really bad for you, so if they can be avoided, why wouldn't you? i'm guilty, i don't eat perfectly, but why examine and analyze it to death? we know trans fats AND saturated fats are not good. and further, we know that trans fats really aren't necessary in foods, and don't occur naturally(for the most part). so i would say, avoid them like cigarettes or low dollar prostitutes.