active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view tarbs's profile Amateur 27 posts since
Jun 11, 2003

Sep 18, 2007 4:23 PM

Pros and Cons of Pacers

I am running my second marathon in October in the Twin Cities and I am running with my sister. She has ran a few more marathons than me and is going to use this race to try to qualify for Boston. I am going to tag along. Her qualifying time is 3:45.

Looking at the pacing charts on the website, we have decided to run using the 3:40 pace chart. We have talked a little about running with the pacer, but we both will be running with Garmins and may just rely on them and my sister's knowledge of the marathon, as she has ran it before.

Was just wondering what the pros and cons are of running with a pace group.

Thanks!
Click to view mutthound's profile Legend 306 posts since
Apr 28, 2006
1. Sep 18, 2007 4:34 PM in response to: tarbs
You may want to run with the 3:50 pace group for the first 5 miles if they are in fact going to run at a 3:50 pace. Then pick it up from there.

I don't like the idea of starting out with a group that will be running at a pace that is faster than your planned pace. It just screams "bonk".
Click to view arc918's profile Legend 422 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
2. Sep 18, 2007 4:50 PM in response to: tarbs
there's no real downside - the best use of the pacer is to keep from going out too fast

you can always run ahead or drop back as you see fit
Click to view songman0412's profile Amateur 15 posts since
Apr 17, 2006
3. Sep 18, 2007 5:31 PM in response to: tarbs
I lost my pace group a couple times when I had to stop for bathroom breaks! You just have to factor that in, because running to catch up will expend too much energy!
Click to view RunnersHigh's profile Legend 259 posts since
Nov 24, 2006
4. Sep 18, 2007 5:48 PM in response to: tarbs
Like someone else has already said, running with a faster pace group is a recipe for disaster. If you or she is trying to qualify for Boston, I would think that you would have some experience with this? Run with the pace group that you are planning on finishing at. Most pacers will usually go out slightly slower and pick it up after a few miles and then stay at even splits. Using a pacing group is not any different than picking someone out of a crowd and trying to stay with them for the entire run or segments of the run. I have to admit; I did try about 5 years ago to stay with the 3:10 group to run a 3:15 and crashed at about mile 21 only to see the 3:15 group go by me like I was standing still. I was trying to factor in the fact that, at the time, I would always bonk the last 4 or so miles. So my thinking was go a bit faster so that I could slow down. I didn't think that I would be reduced to a jog/walk that day. I learned my lesson.
Click to view Ksabbo's profile Pro 61 posts since
Jun 11, 2002
5. Sep 19, 2007 6:38 PM in response to: tarbs
My experience with pace groups is that they attempt to run EXACT splits. Pacers can't possible take into account all the different ways runners want to execute the marathon. This method wasn't attractive for me since at that time I wanted to start slower at the beginning and negative split.

I decided to start with a pace group 5 minutes slower than my goal. I stuck with them for the first 6 miles. I assessed how I was feeling and left them behind. I nailed my goal pace!

When they finished, they were 2-3 minutes ahead of goal. Yikes, this could be trouble for many runners. If you start with a pace group that is already faster than your goal, what happens if the pace group is even faster. You're screwed.

Also, if you use the Garmin, keep in mind it will track YOUR pace. It will not be on the COURSE pace. Nobody runs the course with perfect efficiency so you need to allow for that. You may want to run approx. 2 seconds per mile faster and factor in 1 minute overall for the unexpected.

Karen
Click to view steverino094's profile Amateur 8 posts since
Aug 16, 2007
6. Sep 20, 2007 8:33 AM in response to: tarbs
Remember that every course is different. Twin Cities, for example, has some uphill stretches from miles 21-23. Knowing those will be there to greet you, you may want to ask yourself, and any prospective pace leader, how to run the course to meet your time goal. Even splits may not be the best way. The TC Marathon web site has pace charts that generally include a gradual warm-up, followed by many miles at pace, followed by the likely slowdown caused by hills and fatigue above 21.Ask a prospective pace leader what his or her race strategy will be -- they may or may not use the marathons pace charts --and then decide if that will work for you.

Also, remember that pace leaders are human. Some are better at implementing consistent pace than others.

Personally, I like running either with or near pace groups. Having someone else worry about the pacing details takes a bit of a load off. And even if there is very little talking the comraderie of the group helps to move you along. One downside is that if it is a large group, moving through the water stops can be a bit congested.
Click to view lakerunr's profile Pro 151 posts since
Dec 12, 2007
7. Sep 20, 2007 9:27 AM in response to: tarbs
I've had better luck with pacers than Garmins. At last year's Chicago, my Garmin was useless - erratic pace, signal loss, it tallied the overall distance as 27.5 miles. I latched on to a pace group at 10 miles and they took me to a BQ.

I also set my marathon PR (bettered my BQ from Chicago by two minutes) going out and staying with a pace group at the Madison marathon last May.

My experience with the Garmins (201, 301, and 305) is that they are great for tracking distance and heart rate (the 301 HRM wasn't so good), and not bad for training pace. But I've tried using the "Training Partner" and Auto-lap with lap pace during races, and they are not reliable. They keep me speeding up and slowing down too much and unnecessarily. It is better for me to get the "feel" for the pace I need to run, confirm it with time splits. So for races I just use the Garmin like a stop watch, but I leave the other features running (except auto-lap/pause). I occasionally check my overall average pace.

Good luck at TCM!

------------------
- Larry -
Boston 2007, 3:53:05
Madison 2007, 3:40:51
Next: Boston Marathon 08
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view tribuddha's profile Pro 104 posts since
Nov 1, 2007
9. Sep 20, 2007 11:05 AM in response to: tarbs
One of the nice things about a pace group is that the pacer will do the thinking. You don't have to keep looking at your wrist to determine where and when you are. You can sit back, focus on the pacer and run.
Click to view Pete OBoyle's profile Rookie 5 posts since
Sep 7, 2007
10. Sep 20, 2007 11:16 AM in response to: tarbs
I plan to use a pace group (3:15) at NY marathon. I think the next slowest pace group is 3:30, so I found the comments about choosing a slower pace group at the start interesting. However, 15 minutes slower is a lot; and I'm not sure how pace groups at NY, or any other large marathon would work because of the large crowds (there are bound to be tons of people running your pace who may not be aware they're in a pace group). At any rate, it would probably be easier to slow down to a slower pace group than speed up to a faster one, if you found it necessary.
Click to view Jim Sullivan032's profile Community Moderator 516 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
11. Sep 20, 2007 11:47 AM in response to: tarbs
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tarbs:
The reason we were looking at the 3:40 pace group is we did not see a chart for 3:45. Anyone know of a good site to work up a 3:45 pace chart?<HR>
I'm not sure why you would need a chart. It's an 8:35 pace.
Click to view bowulf's profile Pro 103 posts since
Nov 30, 2005
12. Sep 20, 2007 2:34 PM in response to: tarbs
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tarbs:
The reason we were looking at the 3:40 pace group is we did not see a chart for 3:45. Anyone know of a good site to work up a 3:45 pace chart? Also, when trying to BQ, I am assuming they go by chip time?<HR>


Go to MarathonGuide, and select Pace Wristband Creator (http://www.marathonguide.com/fitnesscalcs/PaceBandCreator.cfm)
Click to view IceStorm213's profile Legend 354 posts since
Nov 1, 2005
13. Sep 20, 2007 7:50 PM in response to: tarbs
quote:<HR>Originally posted by lstall:
I've had better luck with pacers than Garmins. At last year's Chicago, my Garmin was useless - erratic pace, signal loss, it tallied the overall distance as 27.5 miles. I latched on to a pace group at 10 miles and they took me to a BQ.

I also set my marathon PR (bettered my BQ from Chicago by two minutes) going out and staying with a pace group at the Madison marathon last May.

My experience with the Garmins (201, 301, and 305) is that they are great for tracking distance and heart rate (the 301 HRM wasn't so good), and not bad for training pace. But I've tried using the "Training Partner" and Auto-lap with lap pace during races, and they are not reliable. They keep me speeding up and slowing down too much and unnecessarily. It is better for me to get the "feel" for the pace I need to run, confirm it with time splits. So for races I just use the Garmin like a stop watch, but I leave the other features running (except auto-lap/pause). I occasionally check my overall average pace.

Good luck at TCM!

<HR>


Really, I had the opposite experience. I needed a 3:20 to BQ and set the Training Partner for 3:19 or so (because we always run a little more than 26.2) and it was dead on throughout.

Having said that, at mile 19 or 20 I started to slow and the pace group passed me. I latched on and stopped looking at the garmin. The pacer brought us in at 3:19:50. Without him, I don't know if I'd have made it.

I would never start out slower and plan on making up the time at the end of the race. It's a lot harder than you think to pick it up after 3 hours.