active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view monilark's profile Pro 146 posts since
Jan 12, 2005
15. Oct 31, 2007 10:50 AM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Jim Sullivan:
I'll try to avoid overreacting and just say this may spell the end of civilization.<HR>


Click to view heakthyrunner's profile Pro 61 posts since
Jun 1, 2006
16. Oct 31, 2007 11:04 AM in response to: Ice Cream
I too have mixed feelings about this show, I wonder how it would be to be one of the runners and kind of being locked into the show, I mean you really have to go through with it. They could have made a point of the average finishing time compared to what they finished in, I just don't like the mararthon being diluted to the point where finishing in close to seven hours is considered being a "marathoner" And I admit that my only mararthon in 5:03 is something that I look forward to improve on for my own self respect
I think my final decision is THANKS to PBS for at least showing a running show
Click to view intensebeet's profile Pro 124 posts since
Oct 28, 2007
17. Oct 31, 2007 11:09 AM in response to: Ice Cream
I thought it was kind of interesting, to fit it into an hour they had to gloss over a lot of stuff, but the average (non-runner) viewer probably wouldn't want to watch more than that. I think what they showed with the V02max is that yes some people are more naturally gifted athletically than others, but with work, almost all of them were able to get their levels up to that same area; that's definitely a hopeful message for people starting out who may not feel as athletic or fit as they imagine the average runner to be.

What I was left wondering has less to do with the show and more of a general question. I see people on here talking about getting their BQ time or not making it into the NYC marathon lottery. What is the point of running these qualifying times if anyone can race (i.e. those people in the NOVA group)? I'm assuming there's more to it than they showed on the tv...
Guest
18. Oct 31, 2007 11:26 AM in response to: Ice Cream
I too was disappointed with the show.

Seemed like most of the people lacked the dedication to take training seriously, and they went with the old standard, short runs during the week, long run on the weekend.

Almost would have been better if they just followed two or three people around, and their struggles, rather than an entire group.
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
19. Oct 31, 2007 1:31 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by intensebeet:
What I was left wondering has less to do with the show and more of a general question. I see people on here talking about getting their BQ time or not making it into the NYC marathon lottery. What is the point of running these qualifying times if anyone can race (i.e. those people in the NOVA group)? I'm assuming there's more to it than they showed on the tv...[/B]<HR>


If you pay your money (to charity) you don't have to qualfiy - it's as simple as that. Boston used to have some prestige but in my opinion it has become just another bloated goodfeelathon.

And as this show demonstrates ANYONE can finish a marathon. - it may be a bit unpleasant, but its really not that difficult.

Ray
Click to view cruxjuris's profile Pro 74 posts since
Oct 5, 2004
20. Oct 31, 2007 2:12 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rbbmoose:
(..) just another bloated goodfeelathon.
<HR>

:-)
Click to view LeftRightRepeat's profile Legend 1,618 posts since
Aug 16, 2007
21. Oct 31, 2007 2:18 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rbbmoose:
If you pay your money (to charity) you don't have to qualfiy - it's as simple as that. Boston used to have some prestige but in my opinion it has become just another bloated goodfeelathon.<HR>


What is it that you think has changed? Boston's charity program has been in place for years and years. Time-waived entries are also given to local running clubs in exchange for providing volunteers and to sponsors and exchange for, well, sponsoring. Nothing new about that. Boston's also always had more than it's share of bandits - unregistered runners jumping in. That's nothing new either. What change is it that you think has taken place?



------------------
->>> John[/URL" target="_blank"> <<<-
Go write something in the
Newbie Wiki[/URL" target="_blank">!!
Running Club[/URL" target="_blank"> Tri Club[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
22. Oct 31, 2007 2:34 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by LeftRightRepeat:
What is it that you think has changed? Boston's charity program has been in place for years and years. Time-waived entries are also given to local running clubs in exchange for providing volunteers and to sponsors and exchange for, well, sponsoring. Nothing new about that. Boston's also always had more than it's share of bandits - unregistered runners jumping in. That's nothing new either. What change is it that you think has taken place?

<HR>


The number of runners has grown and I suspect (although I could be wrong) the number of charity runners. The course (and Hopkinton) can't support it. It used to mean something when you said you ran Boston - but now everyone's weird uncle Harold "ran" it as part of an effort to cure Rabies and he did it wearing bowling shoes, wearing a top hat and smoking a cigar. Not that there's anything wrong with that - hats off to to Harold and his charity - but couldn't we have one pure "Runners" marathon to go with the thousands of charity events?

Ray
Click to view JB094's profile Amateur 12 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
23. Oct 31, 2007 3:08 PM in response to: Ice Cream
Why do you guys have to be such snobs? The charity runners at Boston start AFTER everybody else. You should never see them. Why does it bother you that they were on the same course as you?

As for a six hour finish time...to them it was just as big of an accomplishment as any PR you are after. And, if they ever do find a cure for Cancer or Lymphoma or whatever charity they are running for...in the big picture, that 6 hour time is a **** of alot more important than your BQ time.

Get over yourselves...
Click to view mark capparella's profile Expert 57 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
24. Oct 31, 2007 3:24 PM in response to: Ice Cream
One of the better "take-homes" I got from the show was the fact that exercise ALONE is not likely to lead to weight loss. As a 50 mpw runner, I know that if I'm not careful, my weight can creep up pretty quickly if I let my diet get away from me. I'm sick of hearing "you must be able to eat whatever you want" from people when I really can't.
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
25. Oct 31, 2007 3:47 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by JB:
Why do you guys have to be such snobs? The charity runners at Boston start AFTER everybody else. You should never see them. Why does it bother you that they were on the same course as you?

As for a six hour finish time...to them it was just as big of an accomplishment as any PR you are after. And, if they ever do find a cure for Cancer or Lymphoma or whatever charity they are running for...in the big picture, that 6 hour time is a **** of alot more important than your BQ time.

Get over yourselves...

<HR>


Yeah - I knew that was coming. You're right everyone's a winner, compeition is just another impediment to global harmony - every kid deserves a trophy just for being on the team, anything less could be a huge blow to their self esteem.

I'm one of those old-school dumbbells who runs to run - and when I want to support charity I just give them the money by writing a check without expecting a race entry etc. Sorry to be so ignorant about that.


Ray
Click to view 770's profile Legend 320 posts since
Jul 22, 2006
26. Oct 31, 2007 4:17 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rbbmoose:
I'm one of those old-school dumbbells who runs to run - and when I want to support charity I just give them the money by writing a check without expecting a race entry etc. Sorry to be so ignorant about that.
<HR>


So am I, but what's your point. The entrants followed the rules of the Boston marathon and have as much right as any other runner who has no legitimate chance of winning the race. And as all know the ONLY reason to enter a race is if you can win it. There is one winner and one only. All others are losers. So if you want to criticize the charity and/or slower runners, check the mirror first.

It was up to the Boston Marathon to accept or reject the entrants. They accepted them. No rules were broken. Congrats to them for their team effort and production of the show.
Guest
27. Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM in response to: Ice Cream
I'm glad they set it in Boston if only for the history and mystique. But then again, it kinda kills the magic, in a way....

I am wondering though, why it would be wrong (as one comment intimated) to do short runs with a long run on the weekend. They trained to finish -- isn't that kind of program good enough? Everything I have read makes it seem like more advanced training, like tempo, hills, & speed, is for more experienced runners. Adding more weekly distance is as well.

It seems to be that they were training reasonably, even if a 9 month time frame was too aggressive for most of them (seeing that they incurred some serious injuries).
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
28. Oct 31, 2007 6:12 PM in response to: Ice Cream
quote:<HR>Originally posted by 770:
So am I, but what's your point. The entrants followed the rules of the Boston marathon and have as much right as any other runner who has no legitimate chance of winning the race. And as all know the ONLY reason to enter a race is if you can win it. There is one winner and one only. All others are losers. So if you want to criticize the charity and/or slower runners, check the mirror first.
<HR>


I may not win, but I'm pretty sure I''ll finish ahead of you.

Ray
Click to view RunTWM's profile Amateur 26 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
29. Oct 31, 2007 6:16 PM in response to: Ice Cream
Good for you, Ray, and, of course, lots and lots of people will finish ahead of you! Maybe some of them think you don't deserve to be out there. I agree with the snob assessment.