active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
80 Replies Last post: Nov 16, 2007 1:25 PM by littlewaywelt   Go to original post 1 2 3 4 5 6 Previous Next
Click to view bostontodd's profile Amateur 31 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
45. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by RunnersHigh43:
http://www.philadelphiamarathon.com/exec/philly/assets/downloads/RaceGuide07V7.pdf[/URL" target="_blank">

The above link is the Race Guide for this weekends Philadelphia Marathon. On pages 13, 21 and 27 they show runners with headphones! On page 17 they list the course rules and they DO NOT mention that running with IPods or any other music device is not allowed. They are obviously either allowing music or felt that it isn't important enough to include the rule ban in the Race Guide. Interesting....guess I can wear my Ipod this weekend.

<HR>


http://www.philadelphiamarathon.com/exec/philly/info/faqs.asp[/URL" target="_blank">

The above link is the FAQ for the Philadelphia marathon which specifically states that among other things, MP3 players, headphones and earbuds are prohibited due to insurance restrictions. Not one of their most important rules, but a rule nonetheless, even if it is forced upon them by the insurance company.

Also, to add one more thing to the "deaf people are allowed to race" discussion, even if the given justification for the rule is so that people can hear announcements or warnings from other people (whether or not deaf people are acutely aware of their surroundings), it does not logically flow that headphones should be allowed. Is the argument that since you can't make deaf people hear the announcements and warnings, you shouldn't bother making the deaf by choice listen? Or is it, deaf people can't hear, so I don't have to listen either? Neither one makes any sense.

http://This message has been edited by bostontodd (edited Nov-13-2007).
Click to view RunnersHigh's profile Legend 259 posts since
Nov 24, 2006
46. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
They obiously don't think it's that important if they didn't list it in their newly printed Course Rules. You're right, it's probably frowned upon but for them not to list it AT ALL in the Race Booklet that each runner will be receiving leads me to believe that they are not going to enforce it. Not to mention it again but they SHOW RUNNERS WEARING HEADSETS! Not once, not twice but in three different pics!



http://This message has been edited by RunnersHigh43 (edited Nov-13-2007).
Click to view bostontodd's profile Amateur 31 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
47. Nov 13, 2007 4:33 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
Oh I have no doubt that they won't enforce it.

I'm personally one those those "follow the rules" types though, so if it were me, I wouldn't wear them.
Click to view maryt091's profile Legend 806 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
48. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by littlewaywelt:
Originally posted by maryt:
Arbitrary? How do you figure? You want the merits of the rule? The problems caused by oblivious headphone wearers are the reason people want them out of races; there's nothing arbitrary about it. I've seen them disrupt the race for other runners, be oblivious to situations that happen out on the course like an ambulance trying to come through, and generally make life more difficult for the officials and volunteers both out on the course and in the finishing chutes. They cause many times more problems and more serious problems than I have ever seen caused by the headphone-free. Nothing arbitrary whatsoever about wanting them out of races. Frankly, I don't care one iota about the problems they may cause themselves; it's the problems they cause for others (and the numerous bad experiences I have had personally both as a runner and an official) that make me cringe when I see them.<HR>

That's your opinion, not fact. I've never once seen anything even remotely factual or statistical at all on this subject. Just because you and other runners believe that to be the case doesn't make it reality. It might be, it might not, but you can't say in a blanket fashion that they cause many times more problems. To do so only makes you look as biased as you are.

Personally, I've seen just as many problems with headphoneless runners as those with them on.

[/QUOTE]
Yes, it's my opinion, but it's based on fact! You've seen as many problems with the headphone free, have you? In just how many races? I have SEEN headphone wearers disrupt other runner's races and have had it happen to me - that's FACT, not speculation in over 1000+ races that I have been involved with. That's a pretty good sample, wouldn't you say? In fact if you want statistics, that's way more observations statistically speaking than would ever be needed for most studies. In those over 1000 races I have NEVER had a major problem with the headphone-free, but have had many problems with those wearing headphones from minor to major. Again - FACT, not speculation. I have spoken with USATF officals and other race directors who have also experienced problems with headphone wearers way more than any problems they have had with the headphone -free.

Headphone wearers may not want to believe it but it's not speculation; it is true - headphone wearers do cause problems and do disrupt races for both runners and officials - way more than those who do not wear headphones. They/you (if you are one of the headphone -wearers) may be too oblivious to realize what problems they cause, but that doesn't mean they/you don't cause problems.

Come on... Just think about it. Those people who say they must wear headpones because they need the distraction. Don't you think that very distraction makes them less able to be aware of what's going on around them, too? Some "headphones don't cause any more problems than headphone-free" proponents remind me so much of those folks who refused to believe smoking could cause cancer. Stick your head in the sand if you want, but if you thought about and were honest, you would know headphones prevent runners from being anywhere near as aware of their surroundings as the headphone-free and that does cause problems.


http://This message has been edited by maryt (edited Nov-14-2007).
Click to view MrPHinNJ's profile Pro 139 posts since
Oct 10, 2007
49. Nov 13, 2007 8:25 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
I think there are runners out there that are oblivious and inconsiderate, and the IPod is just another weapon in their arsenal. This doesn't mean that everyone who wears and IPod while running is unaware of their surroundings. It's just like driving while talking on the cell phone. Some drivers can handle it, but for other drivers it's the last thing they need to be doing (for the record I don't advocate the practice).

But none of that matters. As djsteveboy said, a rule is a rule. We choose to either abide by it or not. It really makes no difference whether we think the rule has merit.
Click to view Jay Soffian (Cool Running)'s profile Pro 170 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
50. Nov 13, 2007 10:29 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
The rules also often state that you need to pin your bib to the front of your shirt. Now call me a rebel, but having my bib on my shirt drives me nuts, so I usually pin it to my shorts. I sure hope that doesn't DQ me on my BQ attempt.

j.
Click to view littlewaywelt's profile Pro 181 posts since
Apr 1, 2005
51. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by maryt:

[/b][
Yes, it's my opinion, but it's based on fact! You've seen as many problems with the headphone free, have you? In just how many races? I have SEEN headphone wearers disrupt other runner's races and have had it happen to me - that's FACT, not speculation in over 1000+ races that I have been involved with. That's a pretty good sample, wouldn't you say? In fact if you want statistics, that's way more observations statistically speaking than would ever be needed for most studies. In those over 1000 races I have NEVER had a major problem with the headphone-free, but have had many problems with those wearing headphones from minor to major. Again - FACT, not speculation. I have spoken with USATF officals and other race directors who have also experienced problems with headphone wearers way more than any problems they have had with the headphone -free.

Headphone wearers may not want to believe it but it's not speculation; it is true - headphone wearers do cause problems and do disrupt races for both runners and officials - way more than those who do not wear headphones. They/you (if you are one of the headphone -wearers) may be too oblivious to realize what problems they cause, but that doesn't mean they/you don't cause problems.

Come on... Just think about it. Those people who say they must wear headpones because they need the distraction. Don't you think that very distraction makes them less able to be aware of what's going on around them, too? Some "headphones don't cause any more problems than headphone-free" proponents remind me so much of those folks who refused to believe smoking could cause cancer. Stick your head in the sand if you want, but if you thought about and were honest, you would know headphones prevent runners from being anywhere near as aware of their surroundings as the headphone-free and that does cause problems.


http://This message has been edited by maryt (edited Nov-14-2007).[/B]<HR>


My sample is 1/10th the size of yours. Personally, I've seen equal problems by both. The difference is you espouse your beliefs based on your experience and present them as fact. They aren't. You're a raced director with access to emails and runners info. Do some post race surveys and get some real data.

Your observances don't equate to a study. You're one person, not thousands and that's a huge difference. No one in their right mind would accept a study of 1000 observations based on one person with an agenda or preconception.

The ppl like you list the same arguments for ppl that listen at low volume, use one earphone...it's your personal agenda. It's just as easy to be distracted when you're exhausted at the end of race as it is to be distracted by cranking the volume up.

Personally if I run in a race with thousands of runners, I expect to be interfered with a tad. it's part of the deal. If you don't want to be affected by other runners don't race. I don't wear them in races, only bc I generally follow the rules as a matter of respect for the ppl that organize the race, not bc I necessarily agree with them.

http://This message has been edited by littlewaywelt (edited Nov-14-2007).

http://This message has been edited by littlewaywelt (edited Nov-14-2007).
Click to view maryt091's profile Legend 806 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
52. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
I'm a scientist and 1 person - 1000 observations is perfectly valid statistically. That's how science is done - a scientist who makes multiple observations. So, yes, it certainly does equate to a study. Not only I have seen multiple problems myself at races, I have also heard numerous complaints from other volunteers and race directors and other runners and heard one race director say he got multiple complaints from runners because he didn't enforce the ban. Of course one would hope that runners would respect the rules of the race and race directors wouldn't need to have extra time and volunteers to try to be police with everything else they have going on, but seems some runners think they are above the rules and don't care whether they disrupt other people's races.

You can give all the hypothetical reasons or goups of people who might also be distracted that you want, to try to compare them to headphone users (like runners at the end of a race) but the fact is there is no comparison. In my 1000+ observations it is the headphone wearers and only the headphone wearers that cause the vast majority of problems. From the annoying "What did he say? What way do we go?" that I got last weekend from a couple of headphone wearers who couldn't hear the midcourse directions to the actual physical contact because headphone wearers don't pay attention. Some minor to be sure, but enough to make you lose focus, others enough to cause a real injury.

I know some people have a hard time accepting that headphones could cause any problems the same way many smokers were in a state of denial about cigarettes.
I never had an agenda or preconception about headphones - tried them myself for easy training runs. It's my personal issue in races because I have had so many problems, not because I have some unreasoning dislike of headphone use. If I hadn't had so many problems on both sides of racing - as a volunteer and as a runner - I wouldn't care.


http://This message has been edited by maryt (edited Nov-14-2007).
Click to view littlewaywelt's profile Pro 181 posts since
Apr 1, 2005
53. Nov 15, 2007 12:56 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
What you fail to get is that you're one person perceiving a problem based on your experiences. That's not a quality data set.

If I observe that my mail is delivered to the next door neighbors sometimes, and I consider that a problem, but everyone else on my street either experience it less frequently, not at all, or don't perceive the issue to be a problem, then there isn't a real globabl problem despite how much it affects me. That's the point; it's your inferences. You don't like them and perceive them to be problem. Just bc you've experienced it to be a big problem doesn't mean it is.

Do a post race survey of all race participants and you'll have meaningful data.

I'm not in denial about anything. It's a question of looking at an issue without personal bias to determine if there's really a problem.
Click to view Jim Sullivan032's profile Community Moderator 516 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
54. Nov 15, 2007 1:33 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by littlewaywelt:
If I observe that my mail is delivered to the next door neighbors sometimes, and I consider that a problem, but everyone else on my street either experience it less frequently, not at all, or don't perceive the issue to be a problem, then there isn't a real globabl problem despite how much it affects me. <HR>
Yeah? Well, my mailman wears headphones and delivers my mail to the wrong address. Coincidence? I don't think so. Stupid mailman.
Click to view littlewaywelt's profile Pro 181 posts since
Apr 1, 2005
55. Nov 15, 2007 1:40 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Jim Sullivan:
Yeah? Well, my mailman wears headphones and delivers my mail to the wrong address. Coincidence? I don't think so. Stupid mailman.

[/B]<HR>


that explains why my my dog doesn't like the mailman; she's in the anti-ipod camp bc some dog w headphones keeps bumping into her and sniffing her butt.
Click to view TitanicExplorer's profile Amateur 11 posts since
Jul 31, 2007
56. Nov 15, 2007 1:42 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
I don't understand why people need to listen to music when they run- i find if I exercise, a headset with music would be a total distraction from my exercise..Can't runners just enjoy the beauty of their running route, rather than listen to top 40 music or the news?
Click to view littlewaywelt's profile Pro 181 posts since
Apr 1, 2005
57. Nov 15, 2007 2:01 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by TitanicExplorer:
I don't understand why people need to listen to music when they run- i find if I exercise, a headset with music would be a total distraction from my exercise..Can't runners just enjoy the beauty of their running route, rather than listen to top 40 music or the news?<HR>


I don't understand why ppl need to hear other ppl cheer for them. It's not always a question of needs; sometimes it's a question of likes.

You don't need to understand it. Ppl enjoy things in different manners. Personally, it's the only time of the day I can listen to music, and the music creates a more enjoyable and emotional experience.
Guest
58. Dec 26, 2007 7:20 AM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by littlewaywelt:
I don't understand why ppl need to hear other ppl cheer for them. It's not always a question of needs; sometimes it's a question of likes.

You don't need to understand it. Ppl enjoy things in different manners. Personally, it's the only time of the day I can listen to music, and the music creates a more enjoyable and emotional experience.
<HR>


I don't understand why people write "ppl" when they mean "people".

On the headphone issue, I won't use them for safety reasons. My sense of hearing is critical to my safety while running on the roads.

I don't consider others' use of headphones much of a threat to my own safety, but I'm usually in the top 5-10% of a race where almost nobody wears them.

On the wheelchair issue, If one athlete is overtaking another, it's the responsibility of the overtaking athlete yield. It doesn't matter if the overtaking athlete is in a wheelchair or not. During a race, especially a marathon, runners will be in varying degrees of distress, and it's unfair to ask a runner to skip out of the way to allow a wheelchair, or anyone for that matter, to fly by.

However, it seems to me that the MCM organizers messed up. There's a reason wheelchair athletes are allowed to go first at Boston. I think it's nice to include wheelers when possible, but I don't think it should be mandatory. In a running event, the runners' safety should come first.



http://This message has been edited by Mike T (edited Nov-15-2007).
Guest
59. Nov 15, 2007 3:04 PM in response to: bigapplepie
Re: I-pods redux
quote:<HR>Originally posted by littlewaywelt:
Just bc you've experienced it to be a big problem doesn't mean it is.
<HR>


I'd bet that maryt positions herself near headphone-wearing runners on purpose to maximize the probability that she will be fouled.

In fact, I'm sure of it.