active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view lolligag's profile Amateur 23 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
15. Nov 25, 2007 2:26 PM in response to: tdelafe
There are four kinds of runners (according to coach Jack Daniels):

1. Genetically endowed, high motivation. They train well, perform well, and often have fast times with rather low effort level. The "rabbits".

2. Genetically endowed, low motivation. These could be winners but don't train well, and often frustrate the coach.

3. Not genetically endowed, high motivation. These are the "Binghams", and are really who this thread is about. They may train seriously but still have low performance compared to group 1. Their effort level can be phenomenal because they are fighting a basic lack of ability.

4. Not genetically endowed, low motivation. Takes part in few or no events; does not enjoy them. (Most of the public is in this group).

So we see that there are basically two groups running these events, nos. 1 and 3 (they do grade into each other somewhat).

Personally I commend anyone who is not genetically endowed to have the gumption and personality to get out there and do what it takes to finish some of these grueling events.

PS for this reason I don't like the word "race". Participants in fair races should be fairly equal in ability, not genetic opposites.
Click to view aurang's profile Legend 1,362 posts since
Jun 26, 2003
16. Nov 25, 2007 5:08 PM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by kcarmike:
What was that? There are people who just arent' meant to be fast. However, they get their butts outside everyday and run, doing speed workouts and hills, trying to improve and have gone from 13mm to 12mm. I call that impressive.<HR>
You're right, and I don't put anyone down or make light of their effort. At the same time, you're kidding yourself (as am I), if you or I think that we work as hard as a professional runner who runs 2-3 times a day everyday, for years. I also wouldn't emulate a very slow runner more than Paul Tergat.
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
17. Dec 26, 2007 7:53 AM in response to: tdelafe
I applaud everyone who gets off the couch and runs - but I have a hard time accepting the "I'm just slow and can't get any faster" attitude - the great thing about running is that if you work hard you WILL improve. - Whether you are a 5 hour or a sub 3 marathoner, hard training will make you faster. That's what I like about running.... To tell the truth, I tuned out Bingham the time I read his article about ordering pizza during a marathon.... Sure, some of us will be faster than others, but everyone can do their best and I'll applaud those who do their best without regard to their finish time.

And yes, I think "race" is a pretty good name for what we do when we push our limits ...and "jogging" is a whole other thing.


Ray

http://This message has been edited by rbbmoose (edited Nov-25-2007).
Click to view balancingact's profile Rookie 4 posts since
Feb 1, 2007
18. Nov 25, 2007 5:22 PM in response to: tdelafe
Nice post. I have to love the quote by lioness:

Some rabbi said that true humility involves standing at your full height and looking at the stars. So I enjoy what I can do, enjoy reaching higher... but know there are many who have reached higher still and good for them--and good for all who are taking who they are and what they have as far as they can.

As a part of group three (the genetically challenged), I admire those who run easily and well, but I know my limitations (and work hard to overcome them). I run races to have a good time, and not always to get a good time.

And we are runners on the inside, even if it's not so apparent on the outside ;-)
Click to view aurang's profile Legend 1,362 posts since
Jun 26, 2003
19. Nov 25, 2007 5:31 PM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rbbmoose:
I applaud everyone who gets off the couch and runs - but I have a hard time accepting the "I'm just slow and can't get any faster" attitude - the great thing about running is that if you work hard you WILL improve.<HR>
For those who don't know, this guy just ran close to 2:40 at the age of 47. As a result, he has a hard time accepting limitations.
Click to view marunr's profile Pro 162 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
20. Nov 25, 2007 6:35 PM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by lolligag:

PS for this reason I don't like the word "race". Participants in fair races should be fairly equal in ability, not genetic opposites.
<HR>


C'mon now, this is a little silly. I race against myself all of the time. That's the beauty of our sport. We can participate in the same race as elite athletes. You're more than welcome to avoid any race with faster people than you if you think it's unfair.
Click to view lolligag's profile Amateur 23 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
21. Nov 25, 2007 7:07 PM in response to: tdelafe
Well, yes, that's the point.

The only one that we really ever race against is ourselves.
Click to view aurang's profile Legend 1,362 posts since
Jun 26, 2003
22. Nov 25, 2007 8:36 PM in response to: tdelafe
I'm pretty sure there were another 4,000 people at my last race, or did I imagine them?
Click to view mrinertia's profile Legend 1,356 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
23. Nov 25, 2007 8:56 PM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by lolligag:
Well, yes, that's the point.

The only one that we really ever race against is ourselves.
<HR>


Nope. This past Thanksgiving for my 5 mile Turkey Trot, I entered with the sole intent of beating a friend of mine. I didn't care what my time was or what place I got as long as I was faster than Mike.

Son of a gun beat me by almost two minutes.


Grrr....
Click to view mrinertia's profile Legend 1,356 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
24. Nov 25, 2007 9:05 PM in response to: tdelafe
It's kind of interesting, the subcultures in running. The Binghams vs the Pfitzingers if you will. We're all out there for our own reasons and no persons reason is less or more valid than anyone else's. I know many people in the Bingham camp and I know many people in the Pfitzinger camp and both sides bring a lot to the table and enrich the sport. One thing is that even though, for the most part, each side recognizes the other's contribution to the sport, it is also true that each side can't really comprehend the others approach to the sport. It's odd to the Pftizingers that someone would run with any other intent than getting as fast as they could. The Binghams think it odd that someone would run past the point of enjoyment to the place where the effort of banging your head against the wall in an attempt to acheive has squeezed all of the fun out of the sport and yet the athlete continues to run.


Oh, and shoe commercials have caused me more woe than anything in the world. I see those stupid things and get all insired and think I'm able to do stuff that I'm not. You'd think with a degree in marketing I'd be immune, but no.
Click to view kcrunner29's profile Amateur 20 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
26. Nov 25, 2007 11:48 PM in response to: tdelafe
The only difference between a "runner" and a "jogger" is the watch!!! You won't find "joggers" with watches! Only runners have watches!

The point: Being a runner does not depend on how fast you are, it is that you care how fast you are. Knowing that you run 12 miles in over 2 hours qualifies you as a runner!

Waddle on, friends!


------------------
I run, therefore I am -- Nuts!
My User Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
My Running Bio[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view lioness1's profile Legend 375 posts since
Apr 1, 2001
27. Nov 26, 2007 1:10 AM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tdelafe:
Sure, it would be great to have the luxury of working out 2-3 times a day, but what's harder: getting up at 5 a.m. to run, then going to work for an 8-10 hour day plus commuting, coming home to family responsibilities and having to prepare your own food, only to wake up the next day to do it all over again ... or ... running 3x a day with a personal trainer, dietician, speed coach, pacer and unlimited fitness equipment at my disposal and know that my only job when I got home was to get a good night's sleep? I think I'll take the latter, if you're offering ... =-)

I read my Runner's World religiously every month and use all the tips I can from the experts ... I'm just saying I'll never run a 7-minute mile or a sub-4 hour marathon.
<HR>


You might find this Running Times article on Brian Sell interesting:

http://runningtimes.com/rt/articles/?id=12152&page=4&c=130[/URL" target="_blank">

He didn't grow up pampered. He put in 10-12 hour days even at 12 years old, and, the article shows, he applied the work ethic he learned from that early experience to his running. Here's a quote from the article:

quote:<HR>The self-imposed pressure to make sure he?s ready for the toughest race of his life will drive Sell to run upwards of 160 miles during his peak mileage buildup, sandwiched around half days of work at the Home Depot as part of their Olympic Job Opportunities program. Typically, when Sell was accepted into the program, in which athletes receive full-time pay for flexibly scheduled half-time hours, he chose to work in the garden department, hauling bags of mulch and landscaping materials around the store. ?Most of the top-tier guys don?t work at all,? he says. ?That would be kind of nice, but it?s nice to have a real job, too.?<HR>


To be in a program like this doesn't happen overnight and as noted, Sell had to be accepted in the program. He was preparing for it throughout his life in far less glamorous ways. Even after getting into this program, he didn't choose something easy.
Click to view ShanGen's profile Legend 280 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
28. Nov 26, 2007 5:27 AM in response to: tdelafe
Great post, however, I think the verb you chose over and over says you are not a jogger - you are a runner!!
Click to view Jim Sullivan032's profile Community Moderator 516 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
29. Nov 26, 2007 9:19 AM in response to: tdelafe
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tdelafe:
...I read my Runner's World religiously every month...<HR>
Then you're definitely a jogger. End of story.