active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view Nobby063's profile Legend 630 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
255. Dec 3, 2007 7:30 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tigger:
...I am currently living at roughly 55 degrees N Lat...about 50 km from the Pacific Ocean, in beautiful British Columbia. Today it's -20C with 50 kph winds. Not a nice day to run outdoors. When I did that -39C run I was living in N Ontario.
<HR>


That's right! You're the one from Canada who's coaching your daughter! Pardon me! So how's she doing? Running with you through the snow and the wind?
Click to view Nobby063's profile Legend 630 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
256. Dec 3, 2007 7:38 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Nobby:
That's right! You're the one from Canada who's coaching your daughter! Pardon me! So how's she doing? Running with you through the snow and the wind?<HR>


Oh, now I read your previous post. Now she's 18? I thought she was like 12... I try to get my girl (not my daughter, but the girl I'm coaching) motivated and it ain't easy. One is to get together with her at 5:00AM on Friday morning... It was like -20 (F, that is...) with wind-chill last Friday...! It was abolutely terrible! But I'm there. I don't just tell her to get out and do it. I try to suffer through (or have fun through...) as she does. I always go back to the story of Cerutty, running a mile the day before Elliot's mile race. This tiny 70+ year old man, running the mile as hard as he could... Then he would say; "You may run faster tomorrow; but you sure as **** can't run as hard as I just did!" It is this character that makes some coaches very unique. Lydiard, Nakamura, Bowerman, Squires....just to name a few.
Click to view IceStorm213's profile Legend 354 posts since
Nov 1, 2005
257. Dec 26, 2007 7:55 AM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by walrusgod:
i do train, and im a 16 year old chinese sprinter. i wasnt saying that non blacks cannot succeed, im saying it is less likely. and btw i can capitalise i just cba! its not through lack of intelligence or anything! i go to one of the top schools in england and i do use punctuation and everything properly i just cant be bothered on tinternet.
however, you cannot argue that the lower legs of black runners are better for running. theres hardly any non black athlete with leg structure like top black athletes. extremely high calves, thin, long lower legs. if your achilles is longer it does make you faster than if you had a shorter achilles, its just a more efficient spring.

http://www.aafla.org/SportsLibrary/JSH/JSH1998/JSH2501/jsh2501g.pdf[/URL" target="_blank">

read this its really interesting (and not jsut because it supports my argument). especially p12 with the picture comparing a black and a white athlete.

http://This message has been edited by walrusgod (edited Dec-03-2007).
<HR>


I'm sorry, maybe I'm too sensitive, but to me this is bordeline offensive. I just skimmed the article, and it doesn't strike me as a particularly good citation (I skimmed it, but it's a pretty dense read). For the record, unlike Nobby, I do question your intelligence. Here's a quote from the article:

"According to the historian David Wiggins, "W. Montague Cobb, the well-known professor of anatomy at Howard University was so intrigued by the debate over black athletic success in track and field that he took anthropomorphic measurements of Jesse Owens to determine if racially linked physical characteristics accounted for differences in sport performance. Cobb, shown here taking measurements of Owens, ultimately concluded that PROPER TRAINING AND MOTIVATIONS TO SUCCEED WERE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTORS IN DETERMINING ATHLETIC SUCCESS." (caps are mine for emphasis)

Saying that all "black" runners -- however you define that -- have a genetic advantage minimizes their accomplishments. Could it be that the top African runners train better and harder? Might they be particularly motivated by, for example, economic incentives? There is a subtle (or less than subtle) racism underlying your expedient dismissal of their achievements.

Are Africans under-represented in speed skating and ice hockey because they don't bear the genetic markers for skating? Or could it be that there are other reasons involved? How do you explain Joan Benoit Samuelson, Ryan Hall, Paula Radcliffe, Mizuki Noguchi? Is Khalid Khannouchi "black" because he is from Morocco? If not, how do you explain his success?

Dick, do you endorse this nonsense? Is this really the logical extension of your genetic argument?
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
259. Dec 3, 2007 7:59 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rengle:
The US has gene pool that dwarfs that of Ethiopia and Kenya combined. Sheer weight of numbers means that we have people with the genetic ability to compete with East Africans. It's a matter of getting them into the sport and properly prepared and all of this defeatist stuff about being inferior to East Africans can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.<HR>


I'm with rengle and Nobby here. Sure there are genetic differences by region, and sure those differences affect running in some very small way, but it's not significant enough to bother with. rengle's point above is key, especially: "It's a matter of getting them into the sport and properly prepared". Right now, there are many more East Africans training seriously than Americans or Western Europeans. It's a matter of numbers, not genetics. How many great soccer players, or football players, or basketball players could be great runners? The fact of the matter is, the top athletes in the US usually don't run. There's more money and fame in other sports so they choose those. Similarly in Europe. If the entire world was as focused on distance running as the East African countries, I very much doubt you would see any regional dominance.
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
260. Dec 3, 2007 8:02 PM in response to: Richard99
Why did you come back Richard? This was going much better without you.
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
261. Dec 26, 2007 7:55 AM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Nobby:
That's right! You're the one from Canada who's coaching your daughter! Pardon me! So how's she doing? Running with you through the snow and the wind?<HR>


She is in Ontario right now. She ran university XC as a freshman, was in a couple of US meets, but forgot that she had to pass her exams to stay there, so she withdrew and went home for the year. She's trying to train for Junior Championships this summer.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by Nobby:
Oh, now I read your previous post. Now she's 18? I thought she was like 12... I try to get my girl (not my daughter, but the girl I'm coaching) motivated and it ain't easy. One is to get together with her at 5:00AM on Friday morning... It was like -20 (F, that is...) with wind-chill last Friday...! It was abolutely terrible! But I'm there. I don't just tell her to get out and do it. I try to suffer through (or have fun through...) as she does. I always go back to the story of Cerutty, running a mile the day before Elliot's mile race. This tiny 70+ year old man, running the mile as hard as he could... Then he would say; "You may run faster tomorrow; but you sure as **** can't run as hard as I just did!" It is this character that makes some coaches very unique. Lydiard, Nakamura, Bowerman, Squires....just to name a few.<HR>


She has a lot of talent and should have a good coach to get it all out. But because we are separated by about 2,000 miles I won't be doing any 5 AM runs with her. I WOULD if I were with her, although she's faster at an easy pace than I am at threshold.

http://This message has been edited by tigger (edited Dec-03-2007).
Click to view rengle's profile Pro 94 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
262. Dec 3, 2007 8:47 PM in response to: Richard99
Ethiopians and Kenyans have different ancestry and different gene pools. On the other hand, many Ugandans and Kenyans share the same ancestry yet it's Ethiopians rather than Ugandans who have been rivaling the Kenyans.
Click to view aurang's profile Legend 1,362 posts since
Jun 26, 2003
263. Dec 3, 2007 9:08 PM in response to: Richard99
Moroccan-born athletes have had far, far more success than Tanzanians or Ugandans. Moroccan-born athletes have run 3:26, 7:23, 12:50 (discounting Lahlafi's 12:49), 26:38 and 2:05:38. I don't think it's just
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
264. Dec 3, 2007 9:26 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by rengle:
Ethiopians and Kenyans have different ancestry and different gene pools. On the other hand, many Ugandans and Kenyans share the same ancestry yet it's Ethiopians rather than Ugandans who have been rivaling the Kenyans.<HR>


Both countries have very diverse ethnicity, so I am not sure they have different ancestry and gene pools. There are likely many overlaps.

The Nandi area of Kenya is close to the border with Ethiopia, but it appears the best Ethiopian runners are not from their side of the border, although borders were not normally based on ethnicity when Europeans chopped the continent into pieces. Nevertheless, the rift valley is shared by both countries, and is the cradle of human development from the very earliest days.

As for Ugandans, well they may have equally good running traits that have not yet been uncovered by good training.
Click to view Nobby063's profile Legend 630 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
265. Dec 3, 2007 9:43 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by walrusgod:
i do train, and im a 16 year old chinese sprinter. i wasnt saying that non blacks cannot succeed, im saying it is less likely. and btw i can capitalise i just cba! its not through lack of intelligence or anything! i go to one of the top schools in england and i do use punctuation and everything properly i just cant be bothered on tinternet.
<HR>


Walrus:

I just thought about this while putting the 3M insulator up in our bed room and out daughter's bedroom (we do need that here in MN; brrrrrr!)...

Here's, as far as I'm concerned, a great example. Here you are, an intelligent kid who can write just fine--meaning you DO have genetic talent to write right. However, out of laziness or whatever, you decided to appear less intelligent (believe me, it does not look good...). So what does that tell you? You have the potential; but you are too lazy to utilize it or simply chose not to. Is it gene or your own choice?

This is what I'm talking about; accepting that YOU are inferior, be it race or person or whatever, deep down, you WILL duck down from doing what's really necessary--TRAINING. "Ah, what's the point? I'm never gonna make it to beat those Africans..." I'm telling ya, when it comes down to it, it IS a mind game.
Click to view Gumbee's profile Pro 88 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
266. Dec 3, 2007 10:10 PM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by tigger:
Yes, there is a huge amount of talent that goes unused. The world would be a much better place if everyone was able to expose their talent and use it effectively.<HR>


Well, I could expose my talent, but I didn't think this was that type of site? (sorry, I just couldn't resist)

Long time lurker. I am fascinated by these monster threads. There is a lot of info in here
Click to view bigapplepie's profile We're Not Worthy 2,636 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
267. Dec 3, 2007 10:50 PM in response to: Richard99
Until someone proves that a particular group of people have a genetic advantage I won't believe it. Until then its at best a statistic and at worst a stereotype.
Click to view mopak's profile Expert 58 posts since
Jan 28, 2005
268. Dec 4, 2007 6:01 AM in response to: Richard99
In the late 50s and 60s it would appear that white Oceanic athletes were genetically advantaged over mid-long distances -think Landy, Power, Thomas, Snell, Halberg, Elliott, Clarke, Doubell, O'Brien, Magee, Farrington, Clayton, Davies, Lincoln, Baillie etc. Of course this is nonsense, the advantage these guys had was environmental, coaching, motivation, confidence etc, etc.
In the 70s and 80s white UK runners dominated -Coe, Ovett, Cram, Elliott, Jones, Spedding, Smith etc. same story.
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
269. Dec 4, 2007 6:39 AM in response to: Richard99
quote:<HR>Originally posted by bigapplepie:
Until someone proves that a particular group of people have a genetic advantage I won't believe it. Until then its at best a statistic and at worst a stereotype.<HR>


Noakes has some interesting thoughts on this subject. You should read The Lore of Running. I don't have the book in front of me right now, but I believe testing has demonstrated black Africans (perhaps it's only Kenyans) have a higher aerobic capacity than white athletes.