active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view sully702's profile Pro 124 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
60. Dec 11, 2007 3:18 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
ATL,

I wish I was like you and was able to say finishing a marathon wasn't a big deal (I'm not being a wise a$$), but to me and alot of other people it really is something big and something we are proud of. We know we aren't great runners and we know we don't run 60 mpw to train for it but it is something none of us ever thought we would or could do and it was done.

Is that really hard to understand?
Guest
61. Dec 11, 2007 3:50 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
We ought to require the marathon organizers to collect biographies and training logs from all participants. Then they could put asterisks in the race results next to the names of people who didn't train enough. Or better yet, they could put an asterisk right on the race number so we don't accidentally cheer for them when they cross the finish line.

Seriously, for someone who has never excercised at all, or battling significant weight problems, or quitting smoking, etc. just getting to the point where they can finish a marathon is a big deal. If they get extra motivation from the goal of finishing marathon and receiving a little respect, then I'm more than happy to give them that respect. It turns out I have an unlimited amount of respect to spread around: I can give a lot of respect to the guy who turned his life around, a lot of respect to the guy who dedicated his life to running as fast as he can, and even spare a little repsect for the guy who on a lark decided to take an easy jog a couple times a week for a few months and enter marathon rather than sit on the couch.
Click to view blaiwayw's profile Amateur 26 posts since
Mar 6, 2007
62. Dec 11, 2007 4:10 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
It you get this far, and think the subject hasn't been run into the ground, check out this site for more.............discussion. Did Oprah really ruin the marathon. Darn, I hope not. My wife loves Oprah. I have to admit one of my goals in my first marathon last year was "to beat Oprah". And I did, by about 4 minutes. I also inspired my 30 year old daughter to run with me. I wish I had all the years left that she has to improve on my running.

http://www.mapmyrun.com/community/discussion/1173/1/how-oprah-ruined-the-marathon/[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view sully702's profile Pro 124 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
63. Dec 11, 2007 4:52 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
I was just out doing a 4 mile run in the rain (no big deal anyone can do it ) and I ve come to the conclusion that Shirley, ATL and Slim were just putting us on. I mean really, who in their right mind could possibly believe that finishing a marathon is not a big deal. lol. You really got me on that one! I know that no one could really be that pompous.

Good job guys (and girl) I got a big kick out of it!
Click to view dzillas's profile Expert 57 posts since
Mar 22, 2004
64. Dec 11, 2007 5:13 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
Is it possible that running a marathon is a big deal and great accomplishment, and that at the same time almost anyone can do it?
Click to view DanW123's profile Rookie 2 posts since
Oct 29, 2006
65. Dec 11, 2007 5:43 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
Maybe this is slightly off topic,but it relates to marathons so oh well,

I don't mean to downplay the accomplishment of running a marathon (regardless of time), but not running a marathon doesn't make me any less of a runner. It just seems like everyone focuses on marathons and if a person doesn't plan on running one, its because they aren't willing to put in the work. I'm willing to do the work, but I'm concentrating on track and xc. I know division I college runners who haven't run a marathon and its not because they don't work hard.
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
66. Dec 11, 2007 7:19 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by sully702:
[b]ATL,

I wish I was like you and was able to say finishing a marathon wasn't a big deal (I'm not being a wise a$$), but to me and alot of other people it really is something big and something we are proud of. We know we aren't great runners and we know we don't run 60 mpw to train for it but it is something none of us ever thought we would or could do and it was done.

Is that really hard to understand?[/b]<HR>


Well yes actually, it sort of is, which is why this thread came about. I didn't say you shouldn't be proud of finishing, just pointed out that it isn't really that hard to do. You seem to be confirming that. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be saying that you don't work terribly hard at running, and yet are able to complete a marathon. Given that, what produces the great sense of accomplishment? You sound as if you think I'm insulting you. I'm not. I truly am just curious.
Click to view sully702's profile Pro 124 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
67. Dec 11, 2007 7:26 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ATLrunner:
Well yes actually, it sort of is, which is why this thread came about. I didn't say you shouldn't be proud of finishing, just pointed out that it isn't really that hard to do. You seem to be confirming that. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be saying that you don't work terribly hard at running, and yet are able to complete a marathon. Given that, what produces the great sense of accomplishment? You sound as if you think I'm insulting you. I'm not. I truly am just curious.<HR>


I don't recall saying that I didn't think I was training hard. I wish I didn't have to work hard at running but it isn't something that comes as easily for me as it does to you. I believe I do put out a very good effort which, in fact, produces a sense of accomplishment.
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
68. Dec 11, 2007 7:31 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by justanotherguy:
We ought to require the marathon organizers to collect biographies and training logs from all participants. Then they could put asterisks in the race results next to the names of people who didn't train enough. Or better yet, they could put an asterisk right on the race number so we don't accidentally cheer for them when they cross the finish line.

Seriously, for someone who has never excercised at all, or battling significant weight problems, or quitting smoking, etc. just getting to the point where they can finish a marathon is a big deal. If they get extra motivation from the goal of finishing marathon and receiving a little respect, then I'm more than happy to give them that respect. It turns out I have an unlimited amount of respect to spread around: I can give a lot of respect to the guy who turned his life around, a lot of respect to the guy who dedicated his life to running as fast as he can, and even spare a little repsect for the guy who on a lark decided to take an easy jog a couple times a week for a few months and enter marathon rather than sit on the couch.
<HR>


Your sarcasm is misplaced. Why do some of you guys think this thread is an attack on the slower marathon runners? Read back through the thread. I haven't heard anybody say that slower runners shouldn't be running marathons. In fact, whenever some fool says something like "get off my marathon course you slow pokes" I and many of the others here will defend their right to be there. Perhaps you missed the thread that motivated this one.

Background: This thread was motivated by yet another "I've been running 5 miles a day twice a week for the last month. I want to run a marathon in two weeks. Should I do it?" post. The reasonable answer to that question is of course no. The next logical question is "why on earth would you want to put yourself through such a painful experience?"

Nobody here is questioning the people who have made dedicated efforts to change their lives and are using the goal of completing a marathon as motivation. It's the people that are completely unprepared to run the distance, and yet want to on a whim that produces the head scratching.
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
69. Dec 11, 2007 7:43 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by sully702:
I don't recall saying that I didn't think I was training hard. I wish I didn't have to work hard at running but it isn't something that comes as easily for me as it does to you. I believe I do put out a very good effort which, in fact, produces a sense of accomplishment.

<HR>


I think you're still missing the point of this thread. Read what I just posted about the origin of this thread. As you point out, it's the hard work that goes into the training that is the real accomplishment. So for the people who haven't put in that hard work, where does the sense of pride come from? Why not run a 5K that you would actually be prepared for? What's so miraculous about a marathon if it can be done without working hard?
Click to view slowgino's profile Pro 88 posts since
Jan 13, 2007
70. Dec 11, 2007 7:47 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ATLrunner:
If I were dead, it would be very difficult to finish a marathon, so if I finish one tomorrow, I should be extremely proud of myself right? Spare me the examples of people with severe physical ailments. I wasn't talking about those people and you know it.<HR>


I still don't understand your point. Clearly, for some people, "finishing" a marathon is no big deal. For others, maybe it is a big deal.

Over a quarter century ago, some of us were doing a 25-30 mile long run every weekend. "Finishing" a marathon then would have been of no import for me, for my brother who was running lots of ultras, or for lots of others.

However, there are many, even though they don't have "severe physical ailments", for whom a marathon is a very worthwhile accomplishment. It all depends on what they had to go through to get there, and how they put it all into perspective afterwards. Some people really do have to work hard and overcome a lot to get there.

I guess I really don't know what people you were talking about. Was it people who didn't have to work hard or train much to finish a marathon and then go about bragging and crowing about their great accomplishment? If so, then we are in agreement.
Click to view ATLrunner's profile Pro 159 posts since
Sep 4, 2007
71. Dec 11, 2007 8:33 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
quote:<HR>Originally posted by slowgino:
I guess I really don't know what people you were talking about. Was it people who didn't have to work hard or train much to finish a marathon and then go about bragging and crowing about their great accomplishment? If so, then we are in agreement.
<HR>


Yes, that's exactly who I was referring to. Although it wasn't so much about bragging. I just wonder why there are so many people out there that would want to put themselves through the pain of a marathon that they're grossly unprepared for instead of running a shorter race. To quote the thread "what's the big deal about marathons?" I suppose the answer to that question though is to brag about having finished one. There seems to be this perception among the masses that just getting to the finish line in a marathon is some immense test of endurance and will power, even though most people can do it with a limited amount of work.
Guest
72. Dec 11, 2007 8:56 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
I'm starting to think the main problem here is the elite runners perspective is just out of wack. It's not really your fault per say, it's just that when you become very good at something like running, I suppose you lose sight of what it was like to be a beginner.

For all you people who are saying that finishing a marathon is not a big deal or that it's easy, in my opinion you are completely wrong. Maybe for you it's that way, but for many many others it is and i'm one of them.

I'm in better shape then 99% of the population and I still believe that if I were to finish a marathon, it would be a tremendous acomplishment for me personally and regardless of what some of you are saying, no it will not be easy. I'm going to need to set aside a lot of time to train. I need to learn more about how the body works, about better nutrition, about better equipment etc... But you better be sure i'm going to be **** proud of myself to tell people that I ran a marathon. I don't even care what my time is. I'm going to be proud to have finished something this difficult.

Now, if someone like me who is in top shape thinks it's a big deal, what about all the other people who are less physically fit finishing one? I think those people are AMAZING, and great for them. I'm happy thier name was announced at the finish line.

Shame on all you elite veteren runners who have lost sight of how truly special the Marathon distance is to most people in this world. I take offense to people saying that it's no big deal, that it's easy, and anybody can do it. You guys are wrong about that.

I shoot in the 60's on the golf course a few times every week. But what an *** I would have to be to tell someone who has just broke 90 for the first time in their life that it's no big deal, that it's easy, and anybody can do it. Do you know how big a party i'm going to throw for my wife when she finally gets it in under 90? **** I may buy her a new car for doing something so great. Do I get a party if I shoot 63 today? Nope, probably just a "good round babe, what do you want for dinner tonight?"

And rightfully so... It's all about perspective. It seems many have lost theirs in the process of getting better.
Click to view velbg's profile Amateur 26 posts since
Feb 25, 2007
73. Dec 11, 2007 9:39 PM in response to: shirleynarsi
From Steetlife: "I'm in better shape then 99% of the population and I still believe that if I were to finish a marathon, it would be a tremendous acomplishment for me personally and regardless of what some of you are saying, no it will not be easy."
Also from Streetlife: "I shoot in the 60's on the golf course a few time every week."

I don't play golf but from watching it on tv, I know a round of golf takes about 4 hours. If you play 3 times a week , that's 12 hours per week. If you can run a mile in 15 minutes, you can run 48 miles per week in those 12 hours. If you do this for a year or more, then finishing a marathon would be easy. If you are actually in "better shape than 99% of the population", you should run at least 3:30 with a 48 mile base.

You probably weren't trying to, but you have presented yourself as a perfect example of a runnerswho complains that they don't have the time to run a marathon or the talent to run a fast marathon. In 99% of the cases, it's just that the slower runners have different priorities and spend their time doing other things.. Maybe they're all out golfing "a few times a week"
Guest
74. Dec 26, 2007 8:12 AM in response to: shirleynarsi
I understand what you're trying to say at least, but golf is my job. It's completely different when comparing time frames people spend on what actually pays the bills in their household.

Running is a hobby for the vast majority of runners. That is one of the main reasons why the Marathon IS such a significant and impressive milestone for most people.

Lets face it most people work. Most people have families, friends, responsibilities, other hobbies. Add to that the many other people who have physical reasons why it's harder for them. Anyone who can find the time on top of everything else in their life, to get out and train and complete an actual Marathon, I say GOOD FOR YOU. I don't care what time you run it in, you did it.

You didn't talk about how easy it "would" be, or "could" be, given time frames, effort etc... They actually DID IT


http://This message has been edited by Streetlife (edited Dec-11-2007).