quote:<HR>Originally posted by pale ale:
The Galloway moderators have completely failed to address this reasonable analysis. Why? Because they know that run/walk does not work for faster runners. It's a dishonest marketing tactic.
Do you disagree?
<HR>
Sure I disagree. I have known Galloway runners up to the 3:15 marathon level, which is a 7:36 pace. I also know that Galloway had a 3 hour pacer at the Marine Corps Marathon 3 years ago. They did 10 second "shuffles" as opposed to walk breaks. And there is no doubt that in my mind that there are a runners faster than the 3 hour who use some form of run/walk/shuffle. So, yes I do disagree with you that faster runners cannot benefit from run/walk. As to how many and/or how much is an individual question just as it is for any runner who determines what works best for them at whichevery race they are participating in, whether it's a 5k or an ultra. And of course, just because a runner uses walk breaks in marathons or ultras does not mean they use them or benefit from them at other distances. There are many different theories as to how walk breaks work/help/hinder runners and this board allows us to discuss those items.
Now, let's address the problem I have with you and zpoint being less than honest posters on this forum. I've been on running boards for a few years now and seen these exact or almost exact statements before from the Scott Douglas crowd who have a personal vendetta against Galloway. You have a beef with Galloway's strategy and are entitled to your opinions. Posters singing Scott Douglas' tune show up in countless Galloway threads whether in the Runner's World, Coolrunning or any other running forum. And it's always about Galloway's "marketing" issues. Not any contributions to how runners using the run/walk can become faster, better or even simply to finish a 5k race, let alone a marathon.
But even when the moderators attempt to respond to your questions you do nothing but disparage them. Since they are here to help facilitate questions/issues among those of us who use or are interested in run/walking there is no point in them engaging you in a meaningless debate that Scott Douglas has already determined for you
It's been very difficult for Galloway and/or other runners using run/walks to have a receptive place we can post and exchange ideas without being ostracized by zpoint and yourself, among others. We've always had to mention our use of run/walks in hushed tones in CR and other sites, similar to certain groups staying in their closet to avoid being denigrated by other runners, especially the Scott Douglas crowd.
This is the first board I'm aware of where run/walkers can freely chat about goals, ambitions, how to achieve them, problems using the run/walk and anything else about run/walk whether using Galloway, Higdon, the Canadian 10/1 version or other versions. It's great that Galloway Productions has furnished this forum.
Just as we don't go posting our questions, stories over in Competitive Running where we know we are not looked upon as "real" runners we would appreciate certain posters who simply want to argue marketing aspects to post where other like minded individuals would gain from their insight.
Simply my 2 cents.