active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
249 Replies Last post: Aug 30, 2006 9:06 PM by 770   Go to original post 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 Previous Next
Click to view 770's profile Legend 320 posts since
Jul 22, 2006
240. Aug 23, 2006 3:55 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by pale ale:
Bull. Serious questions regarding the applicaiton of the run/walk method to faster marathons have been raised. The moderators have chosen to ignore these questions. If Galloway or the moderators of this site claim that someone running sub-3 would benefit from walk breaks they should be prepared to back up those claims, especally when they are questioned.

<HR>


If you have an issue with Jeff Galloway's marketing efforts take it up with him. I've yet to see you contribute anything to this forum and those of us who have benefitted from his training.

Besides the thousands of marathon runners that have set PR's using his method give more than ample testimony as to the effectiveness of the run/walk breaks. As to how much they benefit sub 3 hour, I have no idea nor do I know of any sub 3 hour runners who would benefit from such a system. But that doesn't mean there may not be a few that have used run/walks.

If you have something to contribute, go ahead. Otherwise troll on.
Click to view Brian Leach's profile Rookie 1 posts since
Apr 15, 2006
241. Aug 23, 2006 9:51 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by pale ale:
Bull. Serious questions regarding the applicaiton of the run/walk method to faster marathons have been raised. The moderators have chosen to ignore these questions. If Galloway or the moderators of this site claim that someone running sub-3 would benefit from walk breaks they should be prepared to back up those claims, especally when they are questioned.

<HR>


If you have a serious question then why not start a new thread asking your legitimate question? Hopefully you can ask that question without numerous others piling on with negative comments. This thread has gotten so out of hand I don't blame the moderators for ignoring it. Most of the 'serious' questions in this thread appear to be very aggressive rather than open minded. Bashing the run/walk method helps nobody(I'm not saying you did).

I would also like to hear the answer as to when the run/walk method is no longer a viable approach to a better time. Clearly at some point someone who can run the entire distance will be faster than a person who uses run/walk. So go ahead...open a new thread and ask politely for an answer. My guess is that the Galloway team will be willing to answer. Just remember not to bash them if you don't agree with their answer.
Click to view pale ale's profile Expert 40 posts since
Feb 11, 2006
242. Dec 27, 2007 3:15 AM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by 770:
Besides the thousands of marathon runners that have set PR's using his method give more than ample testimony as to the effectiveness of the run/walk breaks. As to how much they benefit sub 3 hour, I have no idea nor do I know of any sub 3 hour runners who would benefit from such a system. But that doesn't mean there may not be a few that have used run/walks.
<HR>



One of the moderators of this forum made a specific suggestion for a run:walk ratio for a 7-min/mile marathon runner:

quote:<HR>Originally posted by Sherri1062:
Wow! Sounds like a great debate going on. I think you hit the nail on the head. Try the walk breaks while on your training runs and see how you not only finish but how you feel afterwards. As a Galloway member I can say that you should love it and regret not trying this earlier! I know people that run/walk in the 7 min mile range for marathons and they typically run 5 minutes and walk 1 minute. The walk isn't a stroll but at a pretty fast clip.
Sherri
<HR>


Someone else (not me) questioned the value of this advice.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by zpoint2:
Really? That's funny, I run in the 7 min mile range and I've never seen anyone employ a run/walk strategy. I've run 7 marathons.

Let's do the math. Suppose your fast walking pace is 12 minutes/mile and you're shooting for 3:00 (6:53 min mile) with a 5-1 strategy, as you suggest. To do this, you'll do 30 "reps" of 5 minutes run followed by 1 minute walk. (150 minutes running, 30 minutes walking)

distance = speed X time

26.2 miles = (150 min) V + (30 min) (1/12 miles/min)

Solving for V, we get V = 0.158 miles/min.

Inverting V to get pace: 1/0.158 = 6.33 min/mile which is a 6:20 pace, which, according to McMillan[/URL" target="_blank">, is on the low end of your lactate threshold (tempo pace of 6:15-6:31 for a 3:00 marathoner) or the high end of your tempo interval pace (6:10-6:23).

So basically the marathon becomes a workout of 30x1200 tempo intervals with 1 minute very brisk recovery walk. Now maybe buried in the pages of one of Galloway's books is the magic formula for completing this workout. But for me anyway, 6x1200 tempo interval is a **** good workout, never mind 30x1200 with only 1 minute recovery!

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Galloway-style walk breaks are a good strategy for some runners, but claiming that they can be useful for the 3:00 crowd is not only ridiculous, but blatantly dishonet.
<HR>


The Galloway moderators have completely failed to address this reasonable analysis. Why? Because they know that run/walk does not work for faster runners. It's a dishonest marketing tactic.

Do you disagree?




http://This message has been edited by pale ale (edited Aug-24-2006).
Click to view Donna Crowell's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Jun 15, 2006
243. Aug 24, 2006 2:03 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
I agree with you, Spankee. We gallowalkers are aware that there are people running the whole way. We don't try to stop them. I don't know what the big deal is. If you find out about the watch, please let me know. I need one too.
Click to view spankee's profile Legend 421 posts since
Nov 4, 2005
244. Aug 24, 2006 3:41 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Donna Crowell:
I agree with you, Spankee. We gallowalkers are aware that there are people running the whole way. We don't try to stop them. I don't know what the big deal is. If you find out about the watch, please let me know. I need one too. <HR>


I can't speak about the merits of the different watches--there may be a thread in the gear thread with people's views. I do know that the Running Room (sorry I might be mentioning a competitor) promotes run-walk in a lot of their clinics in Canada and the US and they have watches with that function on their web site www.runningroom.com[/URL" target="_blank">

Weather is too nice for running to get too intangled in what works, and what doesn't. Hope everyone enjoys their runs and finishes with the glow.



------------------
It's all good
Click to view 770's profile Legend 320 posts since
Jul 22, 2006
245. Aug 24, 2006 9:48 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by pale ale:
The Galloway moderators have completely failed to address this reasonable analysis. Why? Because they know that run/walk does not work for faster runners. It's a dishonest marketing tactic.

Do you disagree?
<HR>


Sure I disagree. I have known Galloway runners up to the 3:15 marathon level, which is a 7:36 pace. I also know that Galloway had a 3 hour pacer at the Marine Corps Marathon 3 years ago. They did 10 second "shuffles" as opposed to walk breaks. And there is no doubt that in my mind that there are a runners faster than the 3 hour who use some form of run/walk/shuffle. So, yes I do disagree with you that faster runners cannot benefit from run/walk. As to how many and/or how much is an individual question just as it is for any runner who determines what works best for them at whichevery race they are participating in, whether it's a 5k or an ultra. And of course, just because a runner uses walk breaks in marathons or ultras does not mean they use them or benefit from them at other distances. There are many different theories as to how walk breaks work/help/hinder runners and this board allows us to discuss those items.

Now, let's address the problem I have with you and zpoint being less than honest posters on this forum. I've been on running boards for a few years now and seen these exact or almost exact statements before from the Scott Douglas crowd who have a personal vendetta against Galloway. You have a beef with Galloway's strategy and are entitled to your opinions. Posters singing Scott Douglas' tune show up in countless Galloway threads whether in the Runner's World, Coolrunning or any other running forum. And it's always about Galloway's "marketing" issues. Not any contributions to how runners using the run/walk can become faster, better or even simply to finish a 5k race, let alone a marathon.

But even when the moderators attempt to respond to your questions you do nothing but disparage them. Since they are here to help facilitate questions/issues among those of us who use or are interested in run/walking there is no point in them engaging you in a meaningless debate that Scott Douglas has already determined for you

It's been very difficult for Galloway and/or other runners using run/walks to have a receptive place we can post and exchange ideas without being ostracized by zpoint and yourself, among others. We've always had to mention our use of run/walks in hushed tones in CR and other sites, similar to certain groups staying in their closet to avoid being denigrated by other runners, especially the Scott Douglas crowd.

This is the first board I'm aware of where run/walkers can freely chat about goals, ambitions, how to achieve them, problems using the run/walk and anything else about run/walk whether using Galloway, Higdon, the Canadian 10/1 version or other versions. It's great that Galloway Productions has furnished this forum.

Just as we don't go posting our questions, stories over in Competitive Running where we know we are not looked upon as "real" runners we would appreciate certain posters who simply want to argue marketing aspects to post where other like minded individuals would gain from their insight.

Simply my 2 cents.
Click to view pale ale's profile Expert 40 posts since
Feb 11, 2006
246. Dec 27, 2007 3:15 AM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by 770:
Sure I disagree. I have known Galloway runners up to the 3:15 marathon level, which is a 7:36 pace. I also know that Galloway had a 3 hour pacer at the Marine Corps Marathon 3 years ago. They did 10 second "shuffles" as opposed to walk breaks. And there is no doubt that in my mind that there are a runners faster than the 3 hour who use some form of run/walk/shuffle. So, yes I do disagree with you that faster runners cannot benefit from run/walk.<HR>


So Galloway had a 3-hour pace group at MCM and you speculate that runners faster than 3 hours have used walk breaks during their marathons. This is solid evidence that fast runners could be even faster if they slow down to walk once in a while? Interesting logic.

If Galloway claims that someone who can already run 26.2 miles contonuously at a 7:00 pace could actually finish faster by including walk breaks then that's fine. He should expect to be challenged on that statement and present some evidence to back it up. He has not. As a close to 3 hour marathoner myslef I am entitiled to question these claims, and if Jeff has something intelligent to say about the matter then I welcome his analysis or evidence. If he has none then he should consider cutting the bull.


http://This message has been edited by pale ale (edited Aug-25-2006).
Click to view Donna Crowell's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Jun 15, 2006
247. Aug 30, 2006 2:05 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
If I couldn't run and take walk breaks I'd have to walk the whole thing. It would take forever.
Click to view Donna Crowell's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Jun 15, 2006
248. Aug 30, 2006 2:08 PM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
If I couldn't run and take walk breaks I'd have to walk the whole thing. It would take forever.

------------------
Click to view 770's profile Legend 320 posts since
Jul 22, 2006
249. Dec 27, 2007 3:15 AM in response to: kevinm057
Re: Jeff Galloway - A Commercial Forum
quote:<HR>Originally posted by pale ale:
So Galloway had a 3-hour pace group at MCM and you speculate that runners faster than 3 hours have used walk breaks during their marathons. This is solid evidence that fast runners could be even faster if they slow down to walk once in a while? Interesting logic.

If Galloway claims that someone who can already run 26.2 miles contonuously at a 7:00 pace could actually finish faster by including walk breaks then that's fine. He should expect to be challenged on that statement and present some evidence to back it up. He has not. As a close to 3 hour marathoner myslef I am entitiled to question these claims, and if Jeff has something intelligent to say about the matter then I welcome his analysis or evidence. If he has none then he should consider cutting the bull.
<HR>


I speculate sub 3 hour runners use walk breaks as much as you speculate there aren't any who do. I'm not out to give you proof one way or the other.

Scott Douglas, the Competitive Running forum, letsrun.com and plenty of other running boards on the internet have forum boards who share your point of view and will be glad to support your opinions about Galloway. You're simply not going to be able to drag the moderators on this board into a useless discussion with you about your personal opinions concerning Galloway's marketing strategy.

If you don't think the walk breaks help you in your running, don't use them, as he will tell you. It's simple as that.

Good luck in your running. 3 hour marathon runners are always impressive to me. And your training at that level would undoubtedly be interesting. Just not as a "proof" that Galloway doesn't work for any runners at that level of competition.



http://This message has been edited by 770 (edited Aug-30-2006).