7.
May 8, 2007 9:11 PM

in response to:
TCO087
Re: 1 minute walk break or is longer better?
quote:<HR>Originally posted by TCO:
In regards to my current run/walk ratio, I am currently doing run 4:30/walk 1 minute.
My plan is to keep doing 2 mile runs until I can do a 2 mile run without going over 165(I'm going to guess 4 weeks or so. Once I get momentum in my training I get big cardio gains pretty quick up to a point.). Then I'll start rotating in 3 mile walk/runs in with my 2 milers, and then keep building from there. <HR>
In my opinion, you could go longer right now, if you used a ratio of 3:1 or even 2:1. I know 3:1 or 2:1 sounds really wimpy, but if you slowed down and went longer you would really increase your endurance faster than running 2 miles at a somewhat fast pace.
Keep in mind that in high school I used to regularly run 12 miles continuously at a 7 min/mile pace, so that taking walk breaks has made me really have to change my way of thinking. I figured I should be able to at least run 1 mile before having to take a walk break. But I ended up having to do a 6:1 ratio on my short runs and a 3:1 on my super long runs. I want to get fitter, and running 26 miles at 3:1 helps me reach that goal more than running a shorter distance and doing a 7:1 ratio. Of course, that is just me.
Like a lot of runners, I like to run a faster time than I ran before. I know that I have to slow down in my training runs to race faster. I've had tons of experience in going for it in a training run and then having a disappointing race.
If it were me, I would shift the feeling good that you get by going for it to a race. I'd pick a race of any distance and go for it. (If you take walk breaks, you need as little as 1/2 a year to complete a marathon. I just did it.) But that's just me.
By the way, what do you coach?