I'm a loyal Asics wearer, and have a pair of each: Kayano (several years of models, model 9, 10, 11, 13) and of the 2120 (and its predecessors). I prefer the Kayano. I find it to have better forefoot cushioning, and to wear longer (more miles) than the 2120. I was hoping to save a few bucks with my most recent 2120's, but found as I was increasing my long runs training for a half-mary, that the pounding made it too trying, so I went right back to Kayano and was very glad to be back in them.

I just picked up a pair of Gel Nimbus 9 try them on as well.. I have 25 miles on them so far they feel really good

What about the Kinsei? I have both Gel Nimbus 8 and the 2120. I use the Nimbus for treadmill and street runs and the 2120 for trail and street. I like the Nimbus much better than the 2120 but don't want to beat up the Nimbus on the trails.

I just ordered a pair of Kinsei's, just to try them out. They're not here yet but am excited to give them a try.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by MattRaz:
Well, I went to the local specialty running store and tried on both Kayanos and 2120s. the guy then suggested the Brooks Transcendent. Hmmmm<HR>

Everyone has different feet. I love this forum cause you can get info about the quality of a shoe, or how a certain model measures up to last years . . . (i've been sold on the DS Trainers for a few model years....)

....but ultimately, you just have to try 'em on!! Then, if you like them, buy 5 pairs. Seriously. You'll kick yourself when you find the perfect shoe and then have to go through the entire process again in 4 months. Once I've supported my local running store... I like watching the big online shoe companies for "buy one get one 50% off" or some similar sale...

------------------
so it goes[/URL" target="_blank">

I just upgraded my pair of gt-2090 to a new pair
of 2120. The 2120s seems looser in the heel