active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
16 Replies Last post: Jun 7, 2007 7:17 PM by puglogic   1 2 Previous Next
Click to view ericd256's profile Legend 444 posts since
Nov 30, 2007
Login to Reply

May 10, 2007 12:44 PM

Diets

Ok so to start the year off and get active again.I started the Atkins diet the same day i started the C25K.Now as i am ending the OHR i am also ending the Atkins(actually already off it). I am looking at doing the Abs Diet.I think with the workout plan they include it can get me fitter than Atkins could.I dont know anyone though that has tried the Abs Diet So i am not sure how much they say about the program is true or not.
They say that in 6 weeks you could lose 20-30 pounds. Which if so would be great. My question is have any of you guys or gals ever tried it and was it as successful as they say? If you did try it were there any hard areas of the diet to stick to?

eric
Click to view mrinertia's profile Legend 1,356 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
1. May 10, 2007 1:00 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
The term "diet" implies some day you're going to stop doing it. Lifestyle change is a bit cliche in my opinion. I've lost 60 pounds with:

1. Nothing Fried
2. No fast food
3. No soda
4. Easy on the cheese and sour cream
5. Get off my a$$

These are guidlines, not rules. If I make all my running goals for the week, sometime's I'll treat myself to butter on my toast or a small fry at McDonald's or something along those lines.
Click to view Brian McN's profile Legend 240 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
2. May 10, 2007 2:52 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
Do what mrinertia has suggested. It's good sound advice. The problem with atkins and running is the lack of carbs. You absolutley need carbs for running. So beware of any diet that is low on carbs.
Click to view pcsronbo006's profile Legend 1,584 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
3. May 10, 2007 9:50 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
Yeah, I never made any meaningful change until I finally stopped lying to myself and everyone I knew about what I did, what I ate, etc. Fat people are compulsive liars, so much so they lie to themselves (I am a card carrying member, so no flames)

so what I did
1. get off my a$$
2. no fried
3. no fast food*
4. less meat
5. more veggies, lots of veggies, some more veggies
6. more fiber
7. less sodium
8. nuke the simple sugars

* ok, few exceptions including McDs scrambled eggs, McDs Fruit and Walnut snack, Wendy's Chicken Breast w/ no sauce/bread, Wendy's Chili, Wendy's Baked Potato

work in progress, for sure, but after 90lbs off my big fat butt... it's key.

logging my food with fitday.com was one of the biggest helpers. Stopped the lying sack of poo which was me from lying about how much fat i was shovelling into my mouth. 40% fat... every day... on 3000 cals/day. 40 freakin percent. Unreal.
Click to view kponds's profile Pro 100 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
4. Dec 27, 2007 9:39 AM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
Well I think you people harping on the word "diet" should realize that "The Abs Diet" is a very misnamed book (no doubt some idiot at Mens Health marketing thought it would sell better if it had that name).

It's not really a diet program, in that he doesn't tell you: you can do this, you can't do this. You should eat X number of Y per day, etc.

What he does is goes through a laundry list of foods that are great for you (nuts, fruit, berries, seeds, veggies, eggs, lean meat, dairy, peanut butter, whole grain products, olive oil, basically anything you could want), and then a shorter list of foods that aren't so great for you (basically just HFCS and trans fats and enriched flour).

He also is a big advocate of eating one "off the record" meal per week of whatever you want.

Then he spends the rest of the book on workouts, which he advocates heavy compound lifting (squats (real barbell ones), deadlifts, bench, military press, etc).

If you workout like this, and eat reasonably well, you will drop body fat like nothing.

One critique I have on it is he is a bit heavy on the protein, even reccomending whey supplements.

I used it as a resource (one out of many), and not as a bible, so I can't say I was "on the abs diet", so take my endorsement with a grain of salt. But I do agree with most of what he says and I do reccomend reading the book.

I've only lost 175 lbs so far, still have 75 more to go. It's been a long journey, and what I have found is that as I have progressed, my diet has gotten simpler, not more complex.

I can fully describe my current diet plan with two words "eat sensibly."

However, I needed the experience that I have now to understand what "sensibly" meant. When I weighed 425 lbs, and ate mcdonalds for breakfast, chinese buffett for lunch, and a frozen pizza for dinner every day, "sensibly" meant skipping my daily venti frap at Starbucks.

If I had adopted the mantra of "eat sensibly" when I started, it would have been an exercise in frustration.

Instead I started out with very strict dieting, that most people would say is unsustainable. While it was unsustainable, it gave me experience to learn about nutrition, and learn about what is reasonable and what isn't.

Nowadays I live with no rules. I largely eat what I want. I don't count calories, figure out carb/fat/protein ratios, or restrict certain foods. I have a beer every night, oftentimes I swap it for ice cream or a brownie. And I'm still dropping weight at a rate that I'm happy with. But it took a lot of work to get there.

http://This message has been edited by kponds (edited May-14-2007).
Click to view cgerber's profile Pro 195 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
5. Dec 27, 2007 9:39 AM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
I agree with the above advice of mrinertia, BrianMcN, and pcsronbo ... losing weight in theory is very easy (but in practice, not so easy). If you want to lose weight you have to take in fewer calories than you burn... there's simply no way around this, no matter what a diet pill ad may tell you. The problem with this is that it's uncomfortable to be hungry. Your body is designed to avoid starvation...and it's a very very powerful system.

One thing I would give the most emphasis on out of the excellent advice given is to write down EVERY SINGLE THING you eat, EVERY SINGLE DAY, and total up the calories. It was an enormous eye opener for me, and the absolute KEY to my weight loss (about 50 pounds over the last few years).

Losing weight, while extremely hard to do, is very simple math and there's no magic bullet, pill, or diet, no matter what the billions of dollars diet industry would suggest.

Good luck!
- Chris

PS: Don't get frustrated! It takes time to put on weight, and it's going to take a lot more time to take it off... stick with the plan and it will happen. A pound a week is a good target for most people...


http://This message has been edited by cgerber (edited May-14-2007).

http://This message has been edited by cgerber (edited May-14-2007).
Click to view goindownsouth's profile Legend 469 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
6. May 15, 2007 6:58 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
quote:<HR>Originally posted by cgerber:
Losing weight, while extremely hard to do, is very simple math and there's no magic bullet, pill, or diet, no matter what the billions of dollars diet industry would suggest.<HR>


I have to admit, the nail was struck squarely on the head on this one... It really comes down to a simple formula known as "calories in-calories out". Do more of the latter and less of the former, get off your duff, and things will, albeit slowly perhaps, take care of themselves...

Remember, folks, while a calorie is still a calorie, not all calories are made equal. I have done my best to eat whole foods (i.e. as unprocessed as possible), and it has worked very well for me over time.
Click to view bowulf's profile Pro 103 posts since
Nov 30, 2005
7. May 19, 2007 4:17 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Brian McN:
Do what mrinertia has suggested. It's good sound advice. The problem with atkins and running is the lack of carbs. You absolutley need carbs for running. So beware of any diet that is low on carbs. <HR>

I lost over 200 pounds on the Atkins Diet, and I am still on it. I run regularly, and have completed multiple half marathons and other races. I apparently do not need carbs for running. Most low carbers are well capable in their exercise regimens.



------------------
Kent A
My Blog[/URL" target="_blank"> | My Gallery[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Brian McN's profile Legend 240 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
8. May 19, 2007 7:55 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
I can run on a low carb diet too, but not fast. Some people break through and train their bodies to perform on fat or other fuel, but there is no better way to replenish glycogen stores that with carbs. There is no way I could do the volume I do at the intensity I run without carbs nor could anyone else. Atkins is great for losing a lot of weight quickly. A 200 pound weight loss will produce way faster times on its own. I admire your weight loss efforts. That takes a lot of self discipline and strength to do what you have done. Once you get closer to your goal weight though you will have to turn to carbs again or you will not have the energy to train properly for improvement.
Click to view bowulf's profile Pro 103 posts since
Nov 30, 2005
9. May 21, 2007 9:33 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
The question is what is "properly for improvement." I am doing 35 mpw and have been at goal for nearly 2 years. My half marathon PR dropped recently 6 minutes from previous one. I may never be fast or win my age group -- even when in Basic Training my best 2 mile time was 13:45. I am fortunate enough to be at that time now seventeen years later at age 35. My glycogen stores have been depleted for nearly 3.5 years now, and I personally appreciate that I never have to worry about bonking after my stores are gone and having to switch to burning fat. I am by no means an expert about running, but it is certainly a myth that one needs carbs to run or do cardio (Dr Stephen Phinney proved that -- http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/1/1/2).[/URL" target="_blank">


------------------
Kent A
My Blog[/URL" target="_blank"> | My Gallery[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Dana Becker's profile Legend 392 posts since
Nov 20, 2007
10. May 23, 2007 2:07 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
quote:<HR>Originally posted by bowulf:
The question is what is "properly for improvement." I am doing 35 mpw and have been at goal for nearly 2 years. My half marathon PR dropped recently 6 minutes from previous one. I may never be fast or win my age group -- even when in Basic Training my best 2 mile time was 13:45. I am fortunate enough to be at that time now seventeen years later at age 35. My glycogen stores have been depleted for nearly 3.5 years now, and I personally appreciate that I never have to worry about bonking after my stores are gone and having to switch to burning fat. I am by no means an expert about running, but it is certainly a myth that one needs carbs to run or do cardio (Dr Stephen Phinney proved that -- http://www.nutritionandmetabolism.com/content/1/1/2).[/URL" target="_blank">


<HR>


You never have to worry about bonking after your glycogen stores are gone? That is the medical description of what bonking is. You don't mention your marathon times. Half marathons aren't long enough to run out of glycogen stores, even if on a low carb diet. Most people can run 18 to 20 miles on stores. Once your glycogen stores are depleted, however, you will slow down, guaranteed. Go out and run 30 miles on nothing but water and electrolytes and let us know how it goes for you.

As for the original topic...for me it was:

1. Accepting that fact that I needed a lifestyle change. Not one thing, but many small things adding up to a healthier "self".
2. Eating more fruits and veggies. A lot more.
3. Eating smaller portions, yet more frequently. I am very rarely "stuffed" anymore.
4. Less fast and fried food. A lot less, really.
5. Running a few thousand miles in the last year.

Btw, congratulations to each and every one of you.
Click to view Brian McN's profile Legend 240 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
11. May 23, 2007 6:22 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
Click to view racerboy's profile Amateur 30 posts since
Feb 29, 2000
13. May 25, 2007 11:05 AM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
I've lost 35lbs in a few months by eating a quality 1500 calories a day (5 x 300 cal meal) and burning 1500 through running, lifting, and the eliptical machine. Now that I'm getting in better shape and working out more, I just adjust my calories to the amount i'm burning "through exercise" a day. This creates a pretty good calorie deficit. I don't cut out carbs, I just make sure they are quality carbs.
Click to view bowulf's profile Pro 103 posts since
Nov 30, 2005
14. May 25, 2007 10:58 PM in response to: ericd256
Re: Diets
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Docster:
You never have to worry about bonking after your glycogen stores are gone? That is the medical description of what bonking is. You don't mention your marathon times. Half marathons aren't long enough to run out of glycogen stores, even if on a low carb diet. <HR>

My point is that in the first two weeks of the Atkins Diet you deplete your glycogen stores. This depletion brings about the Induction flu symptoms which essentially mimics bonking over a prolonged period of time. Depending on the amount of carbs you bring back into your system raises or lowers your glycogen stores.

I agree pcsrondo - you have to find out what works for you. What works for me is obviously not for others.