active network espn
1,820 Replies Last post: Jul 4, 2008 4:59 PM by Jay Silvio   Go to original post 62 ... 122 Previous Next
Click to view Spiridon's profile Amateur 21 posts since
Nov 21, 2007
915. Jan 28, 2008 12:54 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

I thought you were against ipods. If I knew you were for ipods I would not have contacted you. I have difficulty with personal attacks, I think, I stated in the past I have some issues I am struggling with. Running sets me free from the demons for a time. I am thankful for the information you provided and sorry for crossing you.
Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 357 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
916. Jan 28, 2008 1:31 PM in response to: Spiridon
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

OK...apparantly i'm easy to confuse with Count Crabula..I'm the one with the headphones and a smile..he's the one with the blood thirsty eyes and red fangs...

Sincerely sorry to hear you are experiencing tough times.. we all share that weight on occasion...be strong..keep running.. and all things pass...works for me..I started running for my life after reading the trios first posts and I haven't stopped since..I'm afraid to look back...although I know they would never catch me :)

you are welcome for the information.. sometimes having a goal or purpose is a healthy remedy for feeling down...contact the usatf and get on board with Team Ipod...that might bring a smile, some music and a little fun to your running...Good Luck..

Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 357 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
917. Jan 28, 2008 1:48 PM in response to: paul gorman66207
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
Your right paul ..and we certainly don't do it easy on this thread.... but here's an observation...I reviewed qualifying marathons for the Boston recently .. around 3/4's of them do not mention headphones/ipods on-line or in their waiver..the few that did.. most mentioned headphones only..plural..so a technical compliance with the Usatf rule would be using one headphone..ta da ..similiar to a cell phone bluetooth. legal to operate an automobile with..wonder if airline pilots get distracted while wearing their headphones..it's common knowledge that some listen to music while their streaking through the sky...anyway ..one headphone in..let the racing begin
Click to view Runner Chick'en's profile Pro 142 posts since
Jan 24, 2008
918. Jan 28, 2008 2:08 PM in response to: maryt091
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Lots to me means allot. I have run many races since the racing bug bit me, I feel no need to brag about what races, how long, how short or how fast. I did pat myself on the back once here, that was enough for me. I have helped out at a couple of races but I enjoy running them much more. I tend to hang around after I am done so I can see the other runners coming in and not even once have I seen any issues coming in or going out. I even asked my husband, who is always there at every race if he has seen any problems. He sees everyone going out and most people coming back in and he said he has never seen any problems. He said pretty much everyone looks happy going out and pretty happy when they see that finish line :)

And as I said twice today and it bears repeating, I was wearing my Ipod this morning when that minivan came out of his driveway. Not only did I hear him backing up but I also saw him, funny how that works. So even though I had my Ipod going, even though I was listening to one of my favorite songs, I was able to avoid what could have been a very bad situation. So for all the bad things you keep saying are happening, it only takes one incident like this to show me that I am very much well aware of what is going on around me, regardless of the Ipod.

Why would I? If people want to use music to run, more power to them. If music inspires someone to get off their duff and outside for a run, that is far more important then anything else. As for enjoyment, I ran a race last year without my MP3 player because the battery died right before the start and I didn't enjoy the race. My music motivates me, it moves me and this you might get more enjoyment is just a bunch of ****. Maybe you do and if that is what you like, I say go forth and have fun. I enjoy listening to music when I run and race, I am not about to give that up, nor am I going to try and convince someone that they shouldn't run without their music. That is a conclusion they should come to on their own.

Click to view Runner Chick'en's profile Pro 142 posts since
Jan 24, 2008
919. Jan 28, 2008 2:11 PM in response to: paul gorman66207
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
I have seen a few people do that, not a bad idea :) Although doesn't it bother you with just the one ear plug hanging out?
Click to view Runner Chick'en's profile Pro 142 posts since
Jan 24, 2008
920. Jan 28, 2008 2:13 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
Amen to that! When I am stressed out from work, I put on my Ipod and either head out for a run or hop on the treadmill at the gym. Either way, I clear my head and pretty soon the only thing that matters is my running :)
Click to view tygrkatherine's profile Rookie 2 posts since
Jan 27, 2008
921. Jan 28, 2008 3:54 PM in response to: Active Toby
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
how do i stop receiving notifications every time someone posts? help please!
Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 357 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
922. Jan 28, 2008 4:14 PM in response to: tygrkatherine
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
when you log in to the active.com home page..in the upper left area you with see a box with Stop email notificaitons..hit that link and it will advise further...you may have to log off and back on to view that box...hope that helps...
Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 388 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
923. Jan 28, 2008 4:43 PM in response to: tygrkatherine
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

<<<<how do i stop receiving notifications every time someone posts? help please


If your profile has a setting which controls whether you get email notifications from any new thread in which you have made a posting. If the setting is ON, the first post in a thread will set email notification for you to on for the THAT thread. Once started in a thread it can only be turned off by going to the thread and looking in the upper left corner of the page for a link which will let you turn email notification off.

Turning off a notification for a thread has no effect on any other thread.

If you never want any notifications, you must turn OFF the option in your profile BEFORE you make any posts in new threads.

Turn OFF the setting in your profile does NOT stop email from any thread started before you turned your profile setting off.

Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 388 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
924. Jan 29, 2008 7:25 AM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
I don't know how I missed this (shown below) in last months issue of the RRCA newsletter. (Road Running Club of America)


And here I've been thinking ill of them for ducking the issue. This certainly isn't an anti-ipod stance, but the RRCA knows that while it provide some benefits to clubs, most clubs would not bother to join if the RRCA could not provide access to Insurance. Without having the insurance to offer, the RRCA is probably out of business.

The RRCA does not stage races, bless races or have any say in what races do other than whatever requirements there are in granting insurance to races.

If you think this fight will be fought over runner attendance to whatever races, you will all be wrong. Once either the USATF or RRCA gets out of the insurance business, the surviving entity on insurance will close the door on ipods so fast you won't and don't believe it. Best you learn to run without them because then the shock of losing the fight you don't think you will lose won't be so bad.

BTW, if you think the replies you guys post from the USATF and perhaps from the RRCA are what they are really thinking, you display your complete lack of understanding about human nature and how people who are temporarily cornered are not likely to be forthcoming about what their position is and where their position is likely to go. I know you get your jollies by pointing out that few are taking a firm stand, but this is certainly a PR issue and most RDs haven't had to deal with such things before. You think they will cave-in, and I agree they will "cave-in" but the cave-in will be to their larger fear which is "no insurance".

If races spurn you, you "might" not come to their race. If races spurn the insurance companies, the race WILL cease to exist, no "maybe" or "might". Human nature is human nature and all the ya da, ya da, ya da, right on, question authority stuff isn't going to be worth a hoot in the end.

If you were nicer about it and sought to help races I'd be more kindly to you, but your "screw the races" attitude will get you nothing but a shorter grace period than you night have had otherwise. Actually, I don't really know what you could do to be nicer to races than just shutting up, because the ipod thing is a distraction issue and not just a hearing issue. (I.E 1 ear bud may help the hearing, but does nothing for distraction that the music "stupor" brings) . The only "insurance" solution to ipods is their demise at races. and when it happens remember I told you so.

BTW, my posting in another thread about the impact of being a volunteer was my own interpretation of a potential liability issue that I know exists. I feel at least somewhat vindicated that such a concept has been noticed by some even more involved with things than myself.

edited to add: I suspect that for "closed" race courses ipods may be allowed for a longer time than on non-closed courses. However, human nature will rule and some RDs will "stretch" their interpretation of what the definition of "closed" is so as to be able (in their mind) to allow ipods. The counter to that by the insurance companies will be to just eliminate the "closed" definition from the mix and ban the ipods regardless because they (the insurance companies) can't "trust" the RDs to strickly follow the rules.

From the December RRCA, newsletter.

iPod oblivion' is a modern condition in which the use of headphones induces a zombie-like state in the wearer. It's fueling the statistics for injuries, causing several major cities to enact fines and court appearances for pedestrians and bicyclists who navigate streets while absorbed in their own heedless iWorld. The USATF recently tightened the rules to prohibit digital music players and cell phones in sanctioned events. Public safety isn't the only issue: headphones could be interpreted as a means of getting assistance, which is against the rules.

Race directors are under considerable pressure by insurance carriers to be proactive in preventing accidents and lawsuits. Imagine yourself a volunteer, making futile efforts to direct a runner out of harms way only to become a witness to an accident that will trap you into lengthy, time-consuming litigation and expense.

Limit your headphone use to off road running, and take precaution during thunderstorms. While electronic devices do not attract lightening, flashovers occur when lightening strikes a nearby object. The charge will cause a wishbone burn along the wires and rupture the eardrums. If you cannot find shelter, remove your devices and crouch down with your feet close together until the storm passes.

Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 357 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
925. Jan 29, 2008 8:18 AM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

NH..I had to set my beverage down and marvel at the workings of your keen debate hardened mind on this one...it's quite the scary place in there...

the first Grassy Knoll theory:

<<<if you think the replies you guys post from the USATF and perhaps from the RRCA are what they are really thinking, you display your complete lack of understanding about human nature and how people who are temporarily cornered are not likely to be forthcoming about what their position >>>

SANE persons summary: Giant Conspiricy : Cornered and snarling like a pack of New York rats, the bi lateral commission, Al Queda, and the Ku Klux Klan have been joined by the USATF, RRCA, IAAF, Cub Scouts of America, and Army Corp of Engineers in a last chance bid to eliminate once and for all the one scourge of mans existence and the only impediment to world peace...The Apple Ipod!!!

<<<(I.E 1 ear bud may help the hearing, but does nothing for distraction that the music "stupor" brings) . The only "insurance" solution to ipods is their demise at races. and when it happens remember I told you so. >>.iPod oblivion' is a modern condition in which the use of headphones induces a zombie-like state in the wearer.>>

Grassy knoll theory 2

(excuse me, but I have to stop typing and take a sec.. having to lol scream on this one)

The Music Stupor: How about the "minimal brain cells: Stupor NH and the "pass on the heroin today ..I'm look'en to score some of that Music Stupor" or "We suspect Lance Armstrong's recent "Zombie Like" New York marathon time to be a direct result of his entering the MUSIC Stupor..an altered state of mind manifesting itself in unreasonable smiling, attempts to dance like MC hammer, significant personality improvement, and ablities to accept technological advances beyond dentures and BP monitors"

(Thanks for not using the word Hades anywhere..but Ipod's aren't really alive NH, even though they make noise.. that's not little people in there...so you can't wish for their "demise".. they're demised already)

And as to INSURANCE ... I would consider paying a buck in an organized race to cover my dangerous ipod insurance increase..if it's only a safety issue and I would hear a non UFO reason to do that...and in the interest of fairness...would you be willing to pay extra cause your old, or your 'ticker" has a good chance to give out..or diabetes...or overweight.. or your first organized race..not paying attention cause your in a Runner Stupor...or RD's covering the buck for me cause I have to run on a course that's unsafe...deducting a buck from the entry fee when it rains or snows..cause thats dangerous!..how you want to work it Mr. Answer Man...we could put you in charge and watch the whole sport of running collapse into an empty, racist, biased, exclusionary hole..Take up Golf NH...it's more your sport..

Thks for the heads up thunderstorm warning...god loves Ipoders ..it's maybe you who should watch the sky for retribution :)

Click to view mike0321's profile Amateur 8 posts since
Jan 28, 2008
926. Jan 29, 2008 9:11 AM in response to: Active Toby
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

we are all adults and need to be responsible. if someone chooses to listen to music, they have the responsibility to be more alert, but it is thier choice. if the race directors choose to ban them from their race, so be it, that is up to them. key word is responsibility, something i think has been weeded out of todays society. we can come up with many scenarios on the pros and cons, but it is up to us as adults to make our own decisions, and take responsibility if we screw up, especially if we are making decisions where we can be affecting someone elses life.
Click to view lahrunner's profile Pro 103 posts since
Dec 21, 2007
927. Jan 29, 2008 1:03 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Hey parkerand susan,

As always, I support your views and appreciate the effort you put in fighting the good fight. I wanted to share some excerpts from three articles I found on this heated topic. Of course, I'm opening myself up to a fire breathing attack from the pitch fork carrier and broom rider but oh well...sticks and stones, blah, blah, blah.

Some of the info is redundant and has been addressed on this site countless times, but still worth repeating.

This first excerpt is from a New York Times article that ran Nov. 1st:

+*While race officials could not cite specific incidents caused by
headphone users*, they did say that the new rule would make races safer
because it improves communication. Still, they fear that banning
headphones may alienate some recreational runners.
+

+“Years ago, the picture of people running marathons was these lean, mean Type-A
male running machines, but today people running are your neighbors,
just regular people,” said Tracy Sundlun, executive vice president for
Elite Racing, which organizes marathons. “It’s a different sport now
and we have to cater to these new people, not exclude them.”
+

This is from a January 19th, 2008 article in San Diego Union Tribune:

+Coordinators of the Portland Marathon, held in October, have issued an
“MP3-friendly” policy. The marathon course is closed to cars, bikes,
skateboards and dogs, so MP3 users will be safe if they use common
sense, organizers said.
+

+Similarly, organizers of San Diego's Rock 'n' Roll Marathon in
June say they will not discourage the use of portable music players.
+

+“This is what our participants do and want,” said Tracy
Sundlun, executive vice president of Elite Racing. “We have to take our
sport to the people. As long as it's not presenting a health or safety
hazard, we try to create a marvelous environment for them.”
+

+Technically, the headphone ban applies to the 4,000 road races
sanctioned by USA Track & Field, which include all major marathons,
spokeswoman Jill Geer said. But she added that race directors have
discretion over whether they enforce the rule, which can be difficult
at large events.
+

+*The ban was implemented as a precaution against injuries and
lawsuits, and is not based on statistics for headphone-related
accidents, Geer said*. The hope is to avoid a dangerous confluence of
trends: The ranks of American runners have swelled beyond 30 million,
and MP3 players have become ubiquitous as the size and cost of the
devices shrink.
+

And from an article on The Final Sprint web site about the open discussion on headphones at the USATF convention:

+Opinions in the room were sharply divided. Organizers of the Twin
Cities Marathon said that they took the ban seriously and disqualified
176 runners from this year’s race for wearing headphones. “I would like
to see USATF enforce the rules,” said the event’s operations manager,
Brian Mastel.
+

+But Tracy Sundlan, whose Elite Racing event management firm puts on
the the Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon series, wasn’t sure the ban was well
thought out and could simply end up driving away customers for race
organizers large and small. “I’m not sure the reason to have the ban is
consistent with where the sport is going,” he said, referring the the
legions of fun runners who dominate the ranks of America’s road racing
participants.
+

+Since USATF is not considering any rules changes at this year’s
convention (it’s not a “rules year”), the ban will be in place for at
least another year. Delegates voted to table the issue until next year,
and Finke said a subcommitte would study the problem and make a
recommendation for action, perhaps limiting the ban to just national
championship events.
+

“It’s really a no-win situation,” said Finke. “I’m looking for a middle ground.”

Imagine that! Mr. Finke is just looking for a middle ground...which is defined by Webster's as: an intermediate position, area, or recourse between two opposites or extremes; a halfway or neutral standpoint. Middle ground appears to be a concept comopletely foreign to Mean and Meaner. Thank goodness, Mr. Finke doesn't share their narrow minded and mean spirited attitudes.

Maybe what we need to be doing is sending emails to the RDs of all the races that are enforcing the ban....or at least to the RDs of races that we plan on running in. Just a thought.

Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 388 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
928. Jan 29, 2008 1:42 PM in response to: lahrunner
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
Elite racing is a FOR-Profit entity and does NOT speak for the racing industry. I believe if you check into Elite racing you might find they reneged on paying the winners of a race because they didn't have the money. It may have been finally paid after almost a year. Real good spokesperson for your side, but what the heck, they agree with you and it is No wonder. They need the ipoders because most non-ipod runners don't think Elite racing races are "runner" races. Just thought you should know who you getting lined up on your side.

As to Newspaper articles. Where is the percentage for a paper to side with a Ban. I suppose you get most of your political information from newspapers too.

<<<<<<< Imagine that! Mr. Finke is just looking for a middle ground.. .................... Middle ground appears to be a concept comopletely foreign to Mean and Meaner. Thank goodness, Mr. Finke doesn't share their narrow minded and mean spirited attitudes.

Middle ground is a concept that plays well when neither party has the gonads to face the issue headon. Do you honestly believe that anyone, in a high profile organization, is going to say anything other than that at this time. The USATF certainly does not welcome the IPODs, and until they are ready to work on next year's policy they can only and should only give you the line of BS that you are eating up like it is ice cream. To not understand that is naivete in the extreme, but then you ipoders seem to wallow in naivete when it comes to the deep understanding the issues involved.

<<<< Maybe what we need to be doing is sending emails to the RDs of all the races that are enforcing the ban....or at least to the RDs of races that we plan on running in. Just a thought.

You should do both, and you should make sure you tell them why in your best naive form. With your having researched the issue from the management side (I'm joking of course) you will certainly impress them with your knowledge of all the issues.

The RRCA conference is coming up in a few months. You should certainly get to all the running clubs before they send off their representatives to the conference.

Please tell anyone who will listen whatever you want. I truly want you ipoders to say as much as you can. The more noise you make the sooner this will get settled. The sooner you organize some "real" race boycotts the better. I'm not jerking you around on this, I really wish you guys would do more and make it louder.

Your attitude and threats to ignore the rules will certainly win you supporters in all corners. NOT

Click to view Magic1955's profile Rookie 2 posts since
Oct 11, 2007
929. Jan 29, 2008 1:41 PM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Doesn't everyone think this is all much ado about nothing? I cannot believe all the INTENSE discussion about I-Pods!