<<<<It's age old debate tactic to attack a person rather than an issue ..readers of your's and my ideas will make there own minds up...wish and try as you might NH ..free will still lives in this world....
I think you will find that about the only thing I attack is "cutters and pasters", "deliberate distorsions", and people who claim they have a position, then go complete opposite of that position later when what they like is better suited from the other side of the fence.
I almost always gave a reason for my questioning any of the RDs issuing statements. IE. pointing out why their position was not necessarily to be taken as indiciative of the whole road racing scene. I didn't say the other RDs didn't work hard or didn't care as was spun about what I said as if I'd question Mom and Apple Pie. Just because someone agrees with YOU, doesn't make them the authority, and just because some doesn't agree with you doesn't make them a know-nothing. Though the latter seems to be defacto around here.
If you post something from an RD that I find outside the normal, how would someone go about questioning the statement and not be accused of attacking or contradicting that person. Essentially, you've tossed up a wall saying. They said it and it can't be questioned.
If you recall someone posted some comments from a RD in Texas about a race on beach. I questioned the applicability of a race on a beach relative to road races in general. The poster tossed the RDs comments in the thread as if the was end all and be all of the whole subject. Yet my pointing out how non-main stream that race was cast aside as picking on the RD. If I implied that the RD implied that his race was indicative of all races, then I'm sure I did contradict hime because if he didn't know that his races was not in the main stream then he shouldn't be considered an expert on the subject.
You don't know what I know about my experience and why I would know beyond just the races I'd directly worked on as to why I would know even more on these managment subjects. However if you read the full article posted by Dave MacGillivray, you will see in there his non-vitriolic discussion of many if not all of the sujects which I conveyed to you. You all blew them off as baloney from me, yet here is essentially the same content and the suggested probability for the future as the result of the content from someone who is at the pinncle of being an Expert in the road racing sport.
Why not read his artlcle and ask him to "prove" all that he asserts? And if he respectfully declines, does that mean he is a know-nothing as many of you claim anyone who can not produce proof is. Or perhaps, you guys are at such a level that he or others doe not feel that giving you a crash course in serious in-depth road management is warrented.
Dave has a website which you should look at to see that the Boston Marathon is just one of the many things he manages.
Even better, go directly to some details of who he is and what he does.
http://www.dmsesports.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.AboutUs&x=7610492