active network espn
1,782 Replies Last post: May 11, 2008 5:37 PM by nikeRdrunner79   Go to original post 94 ... 119 Previous Next
Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 347 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
1,395. Feb 15, 2008 8:32 AM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Further disinformation....I ran the Creaky Bones 5k (very cool tank tops with skeleton) this article references with 8 friends..... well over 1/2 the runners used ipods... I think I placed in my age group..there was no mention of prohibiting ipods in any advertising or paperwork..the race info is below in red in it's entirity.. I read the Corn Maze 4 miler info..nothing whatsoever about probitions on anything..which leads me to beleive there might have been cows on the course..take note Lucy...a race you can run with your horse...with free corn maze at the finish....

<<Technically, at last weekend's Marine Corps Marathon here, and even at much smaller events like the Creaky Bones 5-kilometer race in Florida and the Corn Maze 4-miler in Tennessee, runners should not have had the luxury of listening to their favorite songs along the way. Marine Corps Marathon officials threatened to disqualify runners using headphones, but did not follow through. >>

<<First Annual ‘Creaky Bones’ 5K Run/One mile walk, and Kids Monster Dash is part of the Sarasota Downtown Merchants Halloween Extravaganza. The 5K race around scenic Sarasota Harbor has ‘Creaky’ water stops, signage, music, and post race refreshments. One mile walk around the island and is pet friendly, Kids Monster Dash in four age groups with finisher medals and trophies to the winners. All participants receive an official ‘Creaky T-shirt to dye for! Awards for 5K winners with age groups.>>

Click to view orionstarr's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Feb 4, 2008
1,396. Feb 15, 2008 8:37 AM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

face it people they'll never be banned. you know why? because you start banning i-pods and banning people from listening to music while running then you'll lose a ton of participants. you know what means right? you lose money. race directors and cities don't want that.

so you can try and make us who listen to music while running lesser of runners all you want but the fact is you may as well get used to it. i-pods and music are much more with the masses these days. that won't change but only grow. so get over yourselves you i'm to good for music snobs.

Click to view orionstarr's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Feb 4, 2008
1,397. Feb 15, 2008 8:41 AM in response to: orionstarr
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

and to add to it my last post and i've stated this before as long as i'm paying my hard earned money to enter a race i can listen to music while i run the **** thing.

if a team or sponsor is paying my way and they have certain rules then so be it i understand that.


but music and sports just go hand in hand. maybe some of you should try it. you'd be better runners for it. B-)

Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 347 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
1,398. Feb 15, 2008 8:55 AM in response to: orionstarr
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Don't forget to contact the USATF..Mr. Orrion

And I appologize to new and old posters for inserting so many lengthy articles...we've had a real drought of actual facts to go along with opinion on this thread for a while.( RK being the worst offender) so I thought I'd rain down some facts for a change..:)

I post all kinds of links to my Facts and Statisics..if any runner finds any of my postings false, interpolated incorrectly, or can't find the link.. then bring it to my attention and I will correct it or give the appropriate link asap...

Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 347 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
1,399. Feb 15, 2008 9:45 AM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

HMMmm..I see you have at least tried to tone down your rhetoric somewhat NH..not civil by any means..but for you a minor improvement.. like getting stabbed with a stick in the eye...and feeling good that it stops...

this is a tough room for you NH..many posters here are not pleased with your nasty tactics..I am one of a few, or maybe only one, who will even acknowledge your existence..I will calmly address you untill you get ugly again.. and at that point I will not..your choice Muchacho

It's age old debate tactic to attack a person rather than an issue ..readers of your's and my ideas will make there own minds up...wish and try as you might NH ..free will still lives in this world....

you don't have facts.. you don't have a persuasive argument from logic... you don't have credibility with your audience.. therefore you have a weak or nonexistant argument..my suggestion to you in persuing your Anti-everything crusade is FACTS...information...research..your zealous opinion alone doesn't cut it ..search the ends of cyberspace for facts..and talk to race directors..ex. (contact Portland RD and ask why ipods are acceptable..listen with an open mind what the experienced RD of a truly large race has to say..and if you want to demean or contradict him/her for their inexperience, their lack of intelligence, say they are disingenious, do so to their face)..report back their responses..be interesting to hear..you can't waste all your energy attacking me..it gets you no where on the issue..I am not THE DECIDER.... and you need my ear..because ears for your words are growing few and far between ...and you, NH, know what happens when the space between ears gets too big and wide....your brains fall out :)

Click to view Jay Silvio's profile Community Moderator 848 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
1,400. Feb 15, 2008 9:47 AM in response to: orionstarr
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
orionstarr wrote:
face it people they'll never be banned. you know why? because you start banning i-pods and banning people from listening to music while running then you'll lose a ton of participants. you know what means right? you lose money. race directors and cities don't want that.
You can't say that iPods will never be banned since some races currently do ban them (beyond just the "no headphones" clause on the waiver). I ran a small charity event last year and the RD refused to start the race until all music players were put away. We were told that this was part of the insurance coverage contingency. I have recently sent emails to Grandma's Marathon and the Twin Cities Marathon asking for information as to why they have chosen to more vigorously enforce the headphone ban at their events. Both of these events have a solid reputation and surely their RDs are aware of the economic impact of excluding a large segment of the running population from their races. I will post any replies I receive.
Click to view Jay Silvio's profile Community Moderator 848 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
1,401. Feb 15, 2008 9:51 AM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
parkerand susan wrote:
contact Portland RD and ask why ipods are acceptable
I have already sent them an email (similar to the ones I sent to Grandma's and Twin Cities) and will certainly post their reply if I receive one.
Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 347 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
1,402. Feb 15, 2008 11:04 AM in response to: Jay Silvio
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

Jay ..I know you're Sweden sometimes... and England sometimes...and Atlantis several times...But you make one point that you answer over and over the same way and I'm curious...Correct me please.. but you seem to presume that because 2 races( probably more I concede) of some size/and reputation (out of 15,000) have made a decision.. that it is, of course, the right one..other wise why would smart people make a wrong decision? the implication being it must be right due exclusively to who made it....do you suppoort all decisions once they're made?..In my world, bad decisions are made every day by entities with size and reputation...FEMA..drinking age...motorcycle helmets.. IRAQ...taxes..and debated and subsequently changed down the road..making a decision doesn't make it right.. nor does the size and reputation of the decision makers..do you agree?

I presume your small charity run was not USATF sanctioned nor of a size/reputation worth mentioning? .. .Was everyone kosher with putting ipods back in the car?...was enforcement warned ahead of time?.. maybe that charity heard from runners whether cheaper insurance for a few bucks hurts their overall charity raising?..we've established (fact) it's a few hundred dollars for event insurance..cheaper is not always better....tell the charity to buy the day old bagels next time and get the good insurance and charity will follow...

I think what orrion was trying to say and I agree is these few race bans we hear about will not ban ipod use in the general population or the majority of runs..guns are probited or banned..but not really banned from existance......Fair assumption Jay? for every race sited for prohibiting and enforcing.. 4 can be named who are allowing ...Grandma's Marthon ( I can't get around how appropriate that name is) just started enforcing this year..the Rebel marathon actually, since they are significantly in the minority of enforcing...there was a significant back lash..I read the blogs...I think it's premature to say anti ipod will be their stance in the future..because of the growth of running they have probabely seen steady increases in runners each year...maybe next year there will 5% less runners...maybe the next year 15%..now the 2010 race meeting has real world repercusions..maybe they become ONLY Grandmas Running Marathon after a few years

the race down the road says plug in..thats where my money goes in the future...I think there are alot of like minded runners doing the same.. this thread goes about 1 to 4 that way.. would you agree? curious to hear your response..

Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 386 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
1,403. Feb 15, 2008 11:41 AM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

<<<<It's age old debate tactic to attack a person rather than an issue ..readers of your's and my ideas will make there own minds up...wish and try as you might NH ..free will still lives in this world....


I think you will find that about the only thing I attack is "cutters and pasters", "deliberate distorsions", and people who claim they have a position, then go complete opposite of that position later when what they like is better suited from the other side of the fence.

I almost always gave a reason for my questioning any of the RDs issuing statements. IE. pointing out why their position was not necessarily to be taken as indiciative of the whole road racing scene. I didn't say the other RDs didn't work hard or didn't care as was spun about what I said as if I'd question Mom and Apple Pie. Just because someone agrees with YOU, doesn't make them the authority, and just because some doesn't agree with you doesn't make them a know-nothing. Though the latter seems to be defacto around here.

If you post something from an RD that I find outside the normal, how would someone go about questioning the statement and not be accused of attacking or contradicting that person. Essentially, you've tossed up a wall saying. They said it and it can't be questioned.

If you recall someone posted some comments from a RD in Texas about a race on beach. I questioned the applicability of a race on a beach relative to road races in general. The poster tossed the RDs comments in the thread as if the was end all and be all of the whole subject. Yet my pointing out how non-main stream that race was cast aside as picking on the RD. If I implied that the RD implied that his race was indicative of all races, then I'm sure I did contradict hime because if he didn't know that his races was not in the main stream then he shouldn't be considered an expert on the subject.

You don't know what I know about my experience and why I would know beyond just the races I'd directly worked on as to why I would know even more on these managment subjects. However if you read the full article posted by Dave MacGillivray, you will see in there his non-vitriolic discussion of many if not all of the sujects which I conveyed to you. You all blew them off as baloney from me, yet here is essentially the same content and the suggested probability for the future as the result of the content from someone who is at the pinncle of being an Expert in the road racing sport.

Why not read his artlcle and ask him to "prove" all that he asserts? And if he respectfully declines, does that mean he is a know-nothing as many of you claim anyone who can not produce proof is. Or perhaps, you guys are at such a level that he or others doe not feel that giving you a crash course in serious in-depth road management is warrented.

Dave has a website which you should look at to see that the Boston Marathon is just one of the many things he manages.

Even better, go directly to some details of who he is and what he does.

http://www.dmsesports.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.AboutUs&x=7610492

Click to view Jay Silvio's profile Community Moderator 848 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
1,404. Feb 15, 2008 12:17 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
Had another poster stated, "iPods can't be allowed in sanctioned races; they violate USATF rules." I would have stated that the Portland Marathon is a certified Boston qualifier (Cert. #OR-03005-LB) which allows music devices. The rules currently leave enforcement up to the discretion of the RD so they certainly can choose to allow or ban iPods at their events. I was simply letting orionstarr know that some major races already do ban iPods so it's probably not correct to say that they will "never" be banned or speculate about what will happen when you "start" banning them.
I agree that this rule may change in the near future (and I wouldn't mind if it did) and that you are probably right that this thread is about 4 to 1 in favor of iPods. The majority of similar threads that I have viewed on other sites, however, run at similar rates against iPods. I think one of the interesting things about "facts" is how differently they can be interpreted by different people with different agendas. Just look at how politicians come up with radically different economic policies based on the same economic data. Call me Sweden...
By the way, your comment on the appropriateness of the name "Grandma's" Marathon was brilliant.

Anyway, here's the first reply to one of my emails (from Twin Cities). It's just what I expected for a first reply and I will request more details when I write back this weekend.

"Thank you for your question. In November 2006 USATF passed the "no
headset" rule. Because we are a USATF sanctioned race we are required to
follow the rules. All USATF sanctioned races must abide by the rules.
The rules intent is to make races safer. This has actually been our
policy since 2002.

Thanks, and please let me know if you have any further questions.

Lindsey Altermatt
Administrative Coordinator
Twin Cities Marathon, Inc.
4050 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 26.2
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
763.287.3888 x 110 | 763.287.3889 (fax) | 763.229.5689 (mobile)
www.mtcmarathon.org"
Click to view orionstarr's profile Amateur 16 posts since
Feb 4, 2008
1,405. Feb 15, 2008 1:07 PM in response to: Jay Silvio
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
to me this sounds like more of a personal issue between runners from what i'm reading. if you don't like i-pods or music devices then don't wear it. if someone else chooses to wear one that is their preferrence what is wrong with that? are you jealous? are you such the elie athlete that anyone who listens to music is cheating? no i don't think so.

i honestly don't care either way. i'll always use my i-pod in races. banned or not. not much they can do what are they going to do search 20,000 people at the starting line?
plus mine is so small you can even tell i have one on.


so you guys have your silly argument but it really makes no difference, the majority wins in this case because the majority of people who make up and pay for these races use i-pods and listen to music. i just ran a marathon and i'd say 90% of people had music on.

Click to view Runner Chick'en's profile Pro 139 posts since
Jan 24, 2008
1,406. Feb 15, 2008 1:26 PM in response to: NHSenior
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

While this reply was far more tame and civilized then so many of your others, saying:

I think you will find that about the only thing I attack is "cutters and pasters", "deliberate distorsions", and people who claim they have a position, then go complete opposite of that position later when what they like is better suited from the other side of the fence.

Isn't exactly the truth. You have attacked anyone and everyone for their thoughts and/or opinions on everything. Your attacks are downright nasty and meant to chase people from this discussion. You want us to see your side of this issue but the way you go about it doesn't exactly warm people up to your thoughts/opinions. There are far better ways to draw people in my friend and as my grandmother, a very sage old woman, always said, you will catch more flies with honey then you will with vinegar :)

Click to view Runner Chick'en's profile Pro 139 posts since
Jan 24, 2008
1,407. Feb 15, 2008 2:03 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
There are far more of us then there are of them :) The best course of action is for us to continue to contact the RD's out there and express our thoughts on this subject and that means all races, large and small. If we contact them before anything is taken to the extreme, we may prevent this kind of thing from happening in the future.
Click to view NHSenior's profile Legend 386 posts since
Nov 23, 2007
1,408. Feb 15, 2008 2:35 PM in response to: parkerand susan
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing
<<<<Was everyone kosher with putting ipods back in the car?...was enforcement warned ahead of time?.. maybe that charity heard from runners whether cheaper insurance for a few bucks hurts their overall charity raising?..we've established (fact) it's a few hundred dollars for event insurance..cheaper is not always better....tell the charity to buy the day old bagels next time and get the good insurance and charity will follow...


I've mentioned that there are only two sources of insurance. You and others seems to think race insurance is commodity that you just shop around to find a better price. I've explained that the insurance situation is anything but that. You choose to say I know nothing.

Perhaps if we had that information from someone you "might" trust perhaps that might cause you to understand that RDs just might have an issue on their side that is more important and less flexible for them than whether you runners show up at their race.

If I provided the info from those that you might trust, you would disparage the info and we don't need that, so why don't you specifically ask the USATF and the RRCA whether other sources of insurance are available as many of you seem to think. All it would take is an email asking if other sources really are available and being ignored by RDs.

When you get a reply could you post BOTH your original and complete question and the complete undoctored reply. That way the readers here can see, if you asked a non-loaded question and a non cut and pasted reply. You do understand why I say it the way I have. There is a matter of distrust in both direction I think you would agree.

Click to view parkerand susan's profile Legend 347 posts since
Oct 17, 2007
1,409. Feb 15, 2008 2:34 PM in response to: Jay Silvio
Re: The iPod conflict brews in racing

what threads have you seen 4 to 1 against?..like to read them..this thread I see.."other threads" is difficult to see...

"Thank you for your question. In November 2006 USATF passed the "no
headset" rule. Because we are a USATF sanctioned race we are required to
follow the rules. All USATF sanctioned races must abide by the rules.
The rules intent is to make races safer. This has actually been our
policy since 2002.

We know that statement in red to not be true...the Twin Cities RD knows that too..ask them why they can't own up and sayTwin Cities Marathon is prohibiting ipods..because thats the truth of it.. ....

THE SARASOTA MARATHON is USATF Sanctioned ..I spoke with the RD personally...and she tells the truth..it's our call ..so plug in and run..