active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view stevebur's profile Expert 41 posts since
Sep 28, 2001
16. Oct 20, 2004 3:19 PM in response to: kudzurunner
kudzurunner, good to hear that about your tempo runs. i use Jack Daniels book as a general rule of thumb and he would have you at 6:55 tempo for your 10K time, so you are on the money for now. as for what you call a "10 mile tempo run" i've seen that type of run characterized as a "steady-state" run. it's all semantics of course, but just to differentiate from tempo as LT pace i find it helpful to call those types of runs something different. the loose definition i saw regarding steady-state was 20-25 seconds per mile slower that tempo pace. of course one holds that pace for a longer time than a tempo LT pace. your 15 miler with the last 7 done at steady state pace sounds again like it is right on the money pace (6:55 + 20-25 sec. would be 7:15-7:20) and distance wise. i have done very similar runs. after a few weeks of 20 mile easy long runs i would back off to a 14-16 miler and do 6-8 at steady state pace. less mileage on the long run but more intensity. i thought those workouts were very helpful. i think many runners neglect these type of runs, they work for any distance type of training. they are a little faster than marathopn pace but obviously slower than tempo pace.
Click to view ninetonite's profile Pro 67 posts since
Aug 15, 2004
18. Oct 20, 2004 6:37 PM in response to: kudzurunner
I sometimes do a steady-state run when the mood hits me and I'm feeling particularly friskie. I have a couple of measured courses and after a mile or so warm-up I pick up the pace and do the next 5-10km sort of quick. I'll track my times and try to beat the "record" from my last friskie run. I don't do these often, but see no harm in them providing they are not done on a recovery day.

As far as true tempo runs or LT workouts, when I was 20ish I used to do an 8 miler at HM pace or a tad faster, started them in 50min at beginning of 1987 and by Oct was banging them off in high 45s. Personally I think that was too much work, likely a 4-5 miler would have done the job just as well. These days I'll do a 5km at the macmillan calculated pace for my fitness.

I will admit that the meat and potatoes of any training program are the long runs and tempo runs. The faster paced training is like dessert: you only get dessert if you can eat your dinner first!
Click to view GreenMan093's profile Legend 332 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
19. Dec 20, 2007 9:05 PM in response to: kudzurunner
quote:<HR>Originally posted by KudzuRunner:
*) Greenman: you are frightening, which is to say truly inspiring. Your comeback story puts the rest of us to shame. My 10K has dropped from 47 to 42; yours has dropped from 55 to 40. Awesome. I've looked briefly at your on-line running log--and discovered that you ran the White Rock Lake Pancake breakfast 5-miler, which is where I ran my 34:35 last year; your time is enviable. Could you distill your training principles into a few pithy advisories, so we don't have to comb through your logs?<HR>


I am the apotheothith of pithy. Jutht athk anyone who knowth me.

A lot of that improvement came from weight loss: I'm about 40 pounds lighter than when I ran that 55:30 almost two years ago.

Much of my early improvement I attribute to one workout I did most every week. My trainer (I got a gym membership that included 5 personal-training sessions) showed me some running-specific strengthening exercises such as walking lunges (sometimes with hand weights), squat-thrust-and-jumps, step-downs, and a lot of core work; I'd do a set or two of those in between 6x800 repeats on the treadmill. I'd do the first 800 around 10K pace, then each would be a bit faster, with the sixth one at 5K pace. It was a killer. But once I got into a race I'd feel tired around mile 4 or 5 and think, "I've been this tired in a workout and then gone faster. Most of my races in those days had negative splits. (They still do, mostly.)

Beyond that, it's miles, miles, miles. I've been running 60+ miles a week lately as marathon prep; even though I'm not doing 10K-specific workouts, my times are still improving.

I hope this helps.


------------------
Me![/URL" target="_blank">

Training and stuff[/URL" target="_blank">

http://This message has been edited by GreenMan (edited Oct-20-2004).
Click to view stevebur's profile Expert 41 posts since
Sep 28, 2001
20. Oct 21, 2004 9:32 AM in response to: kudzurunner
kudzurunner
i've read some of Tinmans stuff over there also. very interesting and he seems to have a good grasp on things. i also like that he is not too dogmatic about his approach. all of these training plans are open to opinion and individual differences. another guy i like is Joe Rubio. not sur ehow much he posts on letsrun at this point but he used to post a lot at the opld MERV forum and had some real gems in my opinion. you know that Jack Daniels himself posts on letsrun don't you? i believe he goes under the screen name of "tupper" or something like that.
the fast tempo pace Tinman gives is really about the same as Daniels would give on his chart. plus i think it is Daniels that has a rule of thumb that LT pace is about 25 seconds per mile slower than 5K pace. so it seems right to me. the slow tempo seems abotu right also, marathon pace seems to be about a minute slower per mile than 5K pace in my judgement (if the proper training is done of course!)
Click to view XsPrINT's profile Pro 109 posts since
Oct 17, 2004
21. Oct 21, 2004 11:23 AM in response to: kudzurunner
ive never ran a 10K before, but 40 minutes sounds pretty tough. My best 5K is 18:30, so my guess is on a 5K i would finish sometime around 42 minutes. what would be good training for doign this?
Click to view GreenMan093's profile Legend 332 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
22. Oct 21, 2004 12:56 PM in response to: kudzurunner
quote:<HR>Originally posted by XsPrINT:
ive never ran a 10K before, but 40 minutes sounds pretty tough. My best 5K is 18:30, so my guess is on a 5K i would finish sometime around 42 minutes. what would be good training for doign this?<HR>


Dude. I've run a 40-minute 10K, and 18:30 in the 5K is still a dream for me. You should be able to bang one out this weekend -- if not, work on your endurance. You have the speed.


------------------
Me![/URL" target="_blank">

Training and stuff[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view stevebur's profile Expert 41 posts since
Sep 28, 2001
25. Oct 21, 2004 3:56 PM in response to: kudzurunner
i've always thought the Daniels predicted marathon times were a little optimistic, but maybe that is because i have never quite hit them from my comparative VDOT for other races! i do think you have to factor in a few things:

1. to hit those times you really need to put in the optimal requisite training for a marathon.
2. it's got to be your "day". it's not as if you can try another marathon every weekend if you have a bad one the week before...the sample size is much smaller for trying to reach your goal.
3. i think age can factor in a bit also. i think someone in their 40's or 50's might have a bit harder time getting to some of those times than someone in their 20's or 30's.
4. i think most of us are pre-disposed to running certain distances better than others. i've ALWAYS had better times in the mid section of distance running (1/2 marathons, 25K's, 10 milers) than i have had at the outer edges (marathon, 5K). i think that is because of various reasons but it appears to me i have decent endurance and decent speed, but not great at either. hence the middle ground where a bit of both is needed is where i do best. after bumping up my mileage considerably i did have a little better success at the marathon (see point #1) coming closer to what say my 1/2 marathon time might predict (and that is relatvie-both distance's PR's came down) but still not where Daniels would predict.
5. and of course these are just general guidelines after all. though i have to say his training paces seem to '"feel" right to me. maybe that is just a self-fulfilling prophecy, but if i do a 4 x 1200 at his VO2MAX pace i feel like i am on the edge of my capabilities.
Click to view dtoce's profile Legend 383 posts since
Nov 10, 2003
26. Oct 22, 2004 6:26 PM in response to: kudzurunner
nice thread you've got going, Adam...since I haven't 'officially' made the under 40 minute 10K club, I have to say that I'll be watching and reading to see if there's anything to learn. My 38:17 earlier this year was both unoffical/uncertified and short. Yikes!

Lots of good information already here. Looks like I'll be starting way back in the spring, once my leg heals up.

Keep up the good work!
Click to view jmp271's profile Amateur 8 posts since
Jan 9, 2004
27. Oct 22, 2004 6:43 PM in response to: kudzurunner
Hey all,
I too have set this (or something similar) as my next training goal. Mostly
to improve my time and see how speed work can work for me in my longer
distances. Do any of you have longer (term and distance) goals for
a half or full marathon? Are you continuing your pursuit of these goals
in your 10K training as well?
I am looking forward to following your progress and goals.

Later,
Joe
Click to view ninetonite's profile Pro 67 posts since
Aug 15, 2004
28. Oct 23, 2004 11:46 AM in response to: kudzurunner
Next year I want sub 40 in the 10km as my #1 goal. Sub 19 in the 5km would be real nice, and sub 1:30 in the HM also a nice round number. However, I will be doing 5km and 10km training and the HM will be an afterthought.
Click to view tallrunner's profile Legend 574 posts since
Aug 16, 2007
29. Oct 24, 2004 2:09 PM in response to: kudzurunner
Did a 42:36, beat my PR by 6 minutes, next sub 40 in the spring. Need to add a lot of mileage from 30-35K to 60-70K per week.