Re: Is a taper appropriate?
"So the big question is what kind of benefit is there to tapering for the first set of races?"
None. Well, you'll probably run the half a little faster, maybe even the marathon the next day, too. It will, however, screw up your training schedule, so I can almost guarantee a slower "race" marathon several weeks later.
"Would it be better to just run them as training runs without a taper?"
Yes. If you can handle 39.3 miles over two consecutive days without getting injured or completely killing your legs, it's actually probably a good LSD-style run.
"Is there any reduction in the chance of injury?"
For what? The target "race" marathon? In any event, running 39.3 probably increases your chances of getting injured, both immediately after the back-to-back runs, and possibly also the target marathon--you might cause a nagging injury that is exacerbated a few weeks later.
"Is it good for increasing stored glycogen?"
Yes. This is the big benefit. You should definitely see some increase in glycogen storage capacity.
"I'm not really running any set schedule for training, and will probably just run in the neighborhood of 55 mpw with 20 mile long runs and race off that mileage."
If you think you can do it without getting injured, run the back-to-back runs. Don't race them. Treat them like your big long run before the marathon. Take an easy weekend the next one. Then do a long taper down to the marathon--if you have six weeks between the two, I'd probably do 12, 20, 18, 15, 12, 9, race on the weekends. If it's five weeks, then do 12, 20, 17, 14, 10, race on the weekends.