It is good to see this thread active. I had planned to take the month of January off (to mentally recover), and then start up again in February. The one month off lasted one week. I ran 0, 30, 30, and 30 mile weeks in January. So far this month I have run 32, 24, and 31. My plan over the next few weeks: three, 34 mile weeks, and then a 24 mile cut back week.
My next 5K race is April 21. Here is the year/time I have done this race in the past: 2002/21:33, 2003/20:18, 2004/20:06, 2005/20:04, and 2006/Did not race due to travel. This is the fastest 5K I race. Every other 5K I do is a lot tougher, and my times show it - upper 20 minutes to mid 21 minutes.
I emailed the race director, asking how the course was measured, hinting I was concerned it may be short. His response:
quote:<HR>
Our race is scheduled for Saturday, April 21 at 9:30 A.M. This will be our 25th annual!
(*name removed*) and I wheel-measured it a few years ago, so hopefully the course is just living up to its billing as ?Maine?s fastest.?
<HR>
This thread has discussed course accuracy in the past. What are everyone?s thoughts my next race? I think it is accurate. It is a long running race (it will be 25 years old this year), it has had the same race director at least since 2002 (the first time I raced it), and wheel-measurement is reliable. I do not think it is certified. The first half mile is down hill, and the rest of it is flat.
If I can only run a sub 20 minute 5K on ?Maine?s fastest? course, can I claim I have run a sub 20 5K? Or would I be voted off the sub 20 minute 5K island?