active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view MichiganFlyer's profile Legend 348 posts since
Dec 9, 2005
435. Feb 14, 2007 10:32 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
A 20 minute 5k is 6:27 per mile.
That may sound fast but you do not need SPEED to run this pace which equates to about 9.6 MPH.

You need endurance.
Almost anyone can run 9.6 MPH for 100 meters.
You just need to increase the distance that you can run that 9.6 MPH.

I bet your top speed is around 15 MPH so you already have the speed to run a sub 20 5-k race. You can train for speed all you want and I don't think you will get much faster in terms of your top speed.

You need to run lots of slow miles to develop the capallaries which bring increased oxygen and physical fitness. This also helps your confidence as you feel better when you run. Once you have the base it is very easy to develop speed...probably within 2 weeks you can be significantly faster by doing some interval or tempo runs. I don't run all my runs slow. Every 2-3 weeks during base I run a race because I am sick of running slow. This makes the races fun as something new and I usually crush my old times by doing this.

I have broken all my records from 2 miles - 6 miles doing no speedwork. Just racing every 2-3 weeks with 90% of my runs at 10:00 per mile pace. If I do speedwork will I get faster? More than likely yes...but as long as my times keep dropping with no speedwork I will keep doing what I am doing.
Click to view mainers's profile Legend 341 posts since
Apr 4, 2006
436. Feb 14, 2007 10:53 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
d3finition

i would agree with Michigan Flyer that if your goal is to beat 20 minutes then building your aerobic endurance is the initial key. so build up to as much easy mileage as you can comfortably handle, throw in some striders on some of your runs to get the legs moving faster.

however, for significant improvements beyond this then you will need to be introducing speedwork into the mix

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Jim24315's profile Legend 1,976 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
437. Feb 14, 2007 11:58 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Agree with much of what's been said. Most of your gains are going to come from improving endurance and raising lactic threshold.

Like Tchuck, I believe that CV intervals are great. If you don't feel like wading through the technical defintion, it works out to roughly your 10k race pace or 15-20 sec slower than 5k. It varies a little, depending on how fast you are. Be sure not to take too long of a recovery jog unless you are sharpening up for an important race. About 1 minute per faster K is about right.

Regarding the faster stuff, it probably is necessary at some point to put the "icing on the cake". I actually have done very little of it, and took my 5k down from 21:30 to 19:40 within about 4-5 months. However, I've only improved another 6 seconds in more than a year since then, but 10 mile and half marathon times have come down a couple minutes each.

Jim[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view joev9's profile Legend 490 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
438. Feb 14, 2007 2:46 PM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Tchuck's advice on the CV intervals was invaluable to me breaking 20 minutes, those once per week and pushing my mileage from 15mpw to 30 mpw did the trick. Hoping to take that advice and push my mileage up to 50mpw and break 40 for the 10K this year...
Click to view runfastcoach's profile Pro 122 posts since
Jan 25, 2006
439. Feb 16, 2007 11:51 PM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Remember, CV training has an accumulative effect. Continue to include them, week after week, or at least several weeks per year to realize full benefits!

Regards,

Tinman
Click to view Jim24315's profile Legend 1,976 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
440. Feb 17, 2007 11:36 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Thanks Tinman, for turning me on to CV's and plenty of other good stuff. Since I started putting it into practice a little more than a year ago I've set PR's at 5k, 8k, 10k, 10 miles, and half marathon.

P.S.
Just turned 61 this week
Click to view Tchuck's profile Legend 554 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
441. Feb 17, 2007 12:31 PM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Happy B-Day Jim, you young man you! Your times are great!

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view duckgeek086's profile Pro 83 posts since
May 17, 2004
442. Feb 18, 2007 11:10 PM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
I've been meaning to participate in this thread since about page 2, but just this weekend I finally got around to actually running a 5K. Dang, that's a painful distance!

I finished in 20:27 and my splits were approximately 6:30, 6:43, 6:36 (:38). It was my second ever official 5k and my first road-only event, so it's a PR for me. Wind slowed me down in mile 2 and fatigue prevented me from going any faster in mile 3. Finishing kick wasn't bad.

I'm doing 1/2 or full mary training right now, so I haven't done any speed work, just tempo runs (7:10), hill routes, some MP (7:50ish) and long slow (8:20ish). My long runs are up to 15 right now and I'm doing about 33 mpw currently. I'll max out around 50 mpw.

I'm 41, a stocky 5'7"/170, and trying to work my way back down to around 160 for the summer.

My other PRs are: 10K 42:49, HM 1:34:56, Mar: 3:37:19 (crash/burn at end of M23). According to McMillan, everything lines up pretty well except I'm underachieving in the marathon.

I'm looking forward to adding some repeats to go along with fewer lbs. and breaking through the 20 minute barrier in late spring or early summer.

Thanks for all of the inspirational stories and great coaching in this thread!
Click to view Tchuck's profile Legend 554 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
443. Feb 19, 2007 9:40 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Good job Duckgeek and welcome. You should have no issue breaking 20 min down the road. The weight loss will do it alone.

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view MaineRunner2001's profile Legend 267 posts since
Mar 15, 2002
445. Feb 21, 2007 11:10 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
It is good to see this thread active. I had planned to take the month of January off (to mentally recover), and then start up again in February. The one month off lasted one week. I ran 0, 30, 30, and 30 mile weeks in January. So far this month I have run 32, 24, and 31. My plan over the next few weeks: three, 34 mile weeks, and then a 24 mile cut back week.

My next 5K race is April 21. Here is the year/time I have done this race in the past: 2002/21:33, 2003/20:18, 2004/20:06, 2005/20:04, and 2006/Did not race due to travel. This is the fastest 5K I race. Every other 5K I do is a lot tougher, and my times show it - upper 20 minutes to mid 21 minutes.

I emailed the race director, asking how the course was measured, hinting I was concerned it may be short. His response:

quote:<HR>
Our race is scheduled for Saturday, April 21 at 9:30 A.M. This will be our 25th annual!

(*name removed*) and I wheel-measured it a few years ago, so hopefully the course is just living up to its billing as ?Maine?s fastest.?
<HR>


This thread has discussed course accuracy in the past. What are everyone?s thoughts my next race? I think it is accurate. It is a long running race (it will be 25 years old this year), it has had the same race director at least since 2002 (the first time I raced it), and wheel-measurement is reliable. I do not think it is certified. The first half mile is down hill, and the rest of it is flat.

If I can only run a sub 20 minute 5K on ?Maine?s fastest? course, can I claim I have run a sub 20 5K? Or would I be voted off the sub 20 minute 5K island?
Click to view MichiganFlyer's profile Legend 348 posts since
Dec 9, 2005
446. Feb 23, 2007 10:00 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Maine runner,

How much faster is this course than other courses you have run?

I would count it if it starts and finishes in the same place. If it is downhill from start to finish it would be harder to accept.

My 1st year of cross country I ran a 23:28 then 24:00.
My 3rd race I ran 21:11 which was obviously a short course. Everyone else was a minute faster at least. I didn't count that as my PR.

If the course is 3.1 miles and doesn't drop 200 feet from start to finish you should count it.
Click to view MaineRunner2001's profile Legend 267 posts since
Mar 15, 2002
447. Feb 23, 2007 10:52 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
Hello Michigan flyer,

Using a software program that shows elevation, the course starts at 320 feet. The first .62 miles drops to 180 feet (-140 feet). It then climbs to 220 feet (+40 feet). It stays at 220 feet until the end where it drops back to 180 feet (-40 feet), and then ends on a climb - back to 200 feet (+20 feet). The net drop is 120 feet.
Click to view MichiganFlyer's profile Legend 348 posts since
Dec 9, 2005
448. Feb 23, 2007 3:22 PM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
quote:<HR>Originally posted by MaineRunner2001:
Hello Michigan flyer,

Using a software program that shows elevation, the course starts at 320 feet. The first .62 miles drops to 180 feet (-140 feet). It then climbs to 220 feet (+40 feet). It stays at 220 feet until the end where it drops back to 180 feet (-40 feet), and then ends on a climb - back to 200 feet (+20 feet). The net drop is 120 feet.

<HR>



A 120 foot drop in 3 miles....That is what 40 foot per mile. Almost 1% downslope. So similar to treadmill running. That's why records only count on the track. People have run 4 minute miles hundreds of years ago on downhill slopes or with the wind behind them.

I hope you smash 20 minutes like 19:30 or something. That would feel pretty good. I don't think a course that is 1% downhill slope would be certified though. The distance is probably correct.
Click to view Zapatista's profile Pro 87 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
449. Feb 24, 2007 11:02 AM in response to: SaintCroixRunner
quote:<HR>Originally posted by d3finition:
Ok guys just a quick question what MPW were you guys at when you broke 20min 5k? <HR>


35-40. Raced often, mostly 10Ks.