active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view ltrun's profile Pro 114 posts since
Jun 24, 2005

Jan 15, 2006 6:19 PM

DRF Phase 2 - Marathon Plan A

Now with 13 weeks to goal race, Phase 1[/URL" target="_blank"> ends and 5 weeks of Phase 2 begins.

The Primary quality workout for the week is a Tuesday track workout. The other components to the week remain. All easy runs, 1-2 days of striders, and progressing the Saturday long run every two weeks.

I guess the discussion goes next to periodization of phases. In Phase 2 for my Q1 workout, I'm going with a progression of Interval (I) pace sessions. Starting out conservative with intervals totaling about 5% of weekly miles and getting up to 8-10%. In Phase 3, the Q1 workout will change to primarily T-pace running.

I think I'm in the right mind to know that I'm not doing a weekly time trial with my Intervals, but just to perform them consistently in the correct VDOT range. Someone taught me a good simple rule for intervals: That the last rep should be faster than the first rep.

Here is my next 5 weeks. (note, all Q1 workouts are at I-pace)

Phase 2 (week#, mpw, Q1 workout, Sat Long run length)
13. 48, 10x 400, 10E
12. 54, 6x 800, 16E (hills)
11. 48, 8x 800, 13 L+T
10. 54, recovery week--no track, 18E (flat)
9. 48, 5x 1200, 5k race

(also note: I modified the TLT workout for an L+T workout (8E/3T/2E--I made it up, is this bad?)

Question 1: I haven't planned on a second quality workout per week, every week. Should I? Or will my plan of one Q workout, the strides, and the rest all easy running suffice?

In weeks 11 and 9, I do have a second Q workout planned, so I guess I am indeed adding enough.

Question 2: Hills are another component to mix in. I dont have a set system to running hills, I just make sure to run hills 1-2x per week. I've rarely run hill repeats, but I have local long runs on hilly road courses. Also, the Sunday trail runs have been in the valley, so usually I guess I do run enough hills. My question is asking how others systematically add hills to the plan. I can't imagine doing the treadmill, but I'm curious on what works.

Like I said before, 60 mpw (my peak mpw, which I hit 2-3 more times through the season) is not huge compared to many of you. I understand that If I add some miles I will probably naturally improve. But this is all the time I can manage. Also, my body can handle this volume. I'd rather concentrate on some aspects like cross-training and strength-training (both at which I'm weak at) rather than more milage.

Does anyone agree with me that marathon training can almost get boring? The DRF is a very simple progressive science. Following a plan, not encountering too many distractions or hitches, and nailing the key workouts as planned sometimes seems mundane. I think I do understand consistency is the key.

Anyhow, the season is developing and I'll keep you posted on the workouts.

Regards, LT

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Run log[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Viich's profile Legend 326 posts since
May 27, 2004
1. Jan 16, 2006 7:27 AM in response to: ltrun
I havn't run marathon distance yet, but I used daniels paces and workouts, if not plans, to train for 5-10K races last summer and found I got much faster.

I just wanted to chime in on the comment you've made several times about only one quality session. I was under the impression (without going back to the book, I admit) that as far as Daniels is concerned, your long run is quality.

Good Luck, and I'm watching to see how your training goes. What you're doing is what I'm planning on doing a year or so from now, once I get a little more running under my belt.

------------------
Craig[/URL" target="_blank">
Craig[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view sue088's profile Community Moderator 264 posts since
Aug 9, 1998
3. Jan 17, 2006 11:40 AM in response to: ltrun
nothing wrong with modifications. But in my opinion TLT is way more difficult that a TL or LT. Something like running on empty. If you didn't think you were ready, your modication was probably a good call. some of my first attempts at TLT were simply trainwrecks.

Vilch--I've always thought of the program a one quality workout. I guess in the beginning the long runs are at easy pace and you are just doing one interval session a week. In the end phases some of you long runs are considered hard once every 3 weeks (tlt) and the weeks with a planned MP has a very minimal tempo run, and the long 20-22 long run is easy physically, just tedious. It probably depends on the individual whether long and slow for 2 1/2 hours is quality. I've always considered the weeks with long, easy as my easy week. The weeks with TLT were....let's just say I had a nice name for those.
Click to view TheNeedToRun's profile Amateur 19 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
6. Feb 5, 2006 9:57 PM in response to: ltrun
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ltrun:

10x400 (2.5 mi @ I-pace)
6x800 (3.0 mi @ I-pace)
8x800 (4mi @ I-pace)

<HR>


ltrun,

I thought Jack was suggesting 4 minutes intervals @ I-pace in his Marathon Plan A. Your 400s and 800s at VDOT 52-53 are < 3 minutes.

Also, did you take a full or short/float recoveries?
Click to view TheNeedToRun's profile Amateur 19 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
8. Feb 6, 2006 8:15 PM in response to: ltrun
I was referring to Jack's marathon training schedule Plan A in DRF, 2nd ed.

I think that your 400s and 800s in 90secs and 180secs respectively with full recovery are not that efficient. If you read Jacks' I-pace section, he said that it will take approx. 2 minutes of running to reach the VO2Max adaptation zone.

For comparison, let's compare 2 workouts:

1) 8x800m in 3:00. Since it takes 2 mins to reach the zone, you are only accumulating a total of 8x1mins = 8 mins of VO2Max time out of 6,400m of I-pace running.

2) 5x1200m in 4:30. Here you will accumulate 5x 2:30 = 12:30 minutes of VO2Max time out of 6,000m of I-pace running.

Hence, you can see that LONGER INTERVALS at I-pace gives more bang for the buck.

Jack also said that short I-pace running (400s or 800s) are still ok but you need to shorten your recovery time. So when you do your next rep, it won't take you a full 2 minutes to reach the Vo2Max zone. Float basically serves the same purpose - by running briskly and not jogging/walking between intervals, you will still be hovering around the VO2Max zone.

Hope this helps.
Click to view GoDawgGo's profile Pro 123 posts since
Jul 1, 2005
9. Feb 7, 2006 10:37 AM in response to: ltrun
Here is a sample Daniel's Plan A I found online. I am not sure if this is 100% taken from DRF 2nd ed., but his interval sessions consist of the following:

I-1 Sets of 1000s, 1200s or miles at I-pace with 3-5 easy run to recover, up to 8-percent of weekly mileage or 10KM whichever is less. Note: I in hard workouts is at about 5K race pace. Do not run faster.


I-2 Sets of 4 minutes hard + 3 minutes easy, up to 8-percent of weekly mileage or 10KM whichever is less. Note: I in hard workouts is at about 5K race pace. Do not run faster.


I-3 Sets of 5 minutes hard + 3-5 minutes easy, up to 8-percent of weekly mileage or 10KM whichever is less. Note: I in hard workouts is at about 5K race pace. Do not run faster.

http://davecamire.com/marathon/Program_A.htm[/URL" target="_blank">