This gets pretty lengthy, but in the end, I'm asking advice, feedback and suggestions.
So I tried out 2L for the free trial period of one week. Unfortunately, that is definently not enough time to get to know the service and coach and being in the current $$ situation I am in, decided not to go for it. Instead I have conducted even more internet research and created a running schedule for base building and soon, racing that I feel will work best for me.
Coincidentally (sp?), after building my schedule, I checked out the Smart Coach feature on RunnersWorld.com, and wow! In seconds this thing popped out a schedule that looked almost exactly the same as the one I drew up! The only major difference is how the weekly mileage stacks up.
Here's what I mean:
During my base building, I schedule three weeks of the same weekly mileage, then do a stepback week (with %20 reduction of the week before), then increase by 10-15% for the next week.
example weeks are:
week 1/2/3: 25
week 4: 20
week 5/6/7: 28 etc...
Once I hit 30mpw, I plan to maintain and do 3 weeks of 30mpw, a stepback week, then 3 weeks of 30mpw, and so on. (I will eventually be switching over to a 12 week half marathon training program in June, in which I want a base of 30mpw before I start)
Now as for Smart Coach, there schedule has similar weekly runs and long runs, but the mileage goes like this:
wk1: 26 wk2: 27 wk3: 28 wk4: 29
wk5: 26 wk6: 27 wk7: 28 wk8:29 and so on...
soooooo...after that long description of my proposed training plan and a little showing of the SmartCoach training plan, I'd just like to hear any opinions. What do you think of how my weekly mileage is set vs. SmartCoach. Is one "better" than the other, or should they produce the same results?
If you made it this far, thanks for reading!!