Forget Calculators: Actual Results? ...

Support | Event Directors & Organizers

Search Cool Running Community

Browse Cool Running

CoolRunning.com > Cool Running Community > Mainstream Racing >

Up to Threads in Mainstream Racing

28 Replies Last post: Jun 3, 2006 12:39 PM by Guest Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next

bhearn

430 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

15. May 19, 2006 1:26 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

quote:<HR>Originally posted by rocknrunner:
1 mile: 5:15
5K: 17:44 (5:43) +:28
5 miles: 29:35 (5:54) +:11
10K: 36:45 (5:55) +:01
10 miles: 1:01:22 (6:08) +:13
Half Marathon: 1:24:00 (6:25) +:17
Marathon: 3:07:15(7:09) +:44

Note: Huge jump in pace from 1/2 to full marathon.
But, I'm working on that!

<HR>

Yeah. I think I could run a 3:07:15 on a flat course. But those other times are wayyyyyyyy out of my reach.

Bob[/URL" target="_blank">

ljwoodw

550 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

16. May 19, 2006 9:48 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

My PRs are all outdated except for the marathon PR, but not by a whole lot. I don't think I could run faster than 16:40 for 5K (5:20 pace).

5K 5:27/mi
Half: 5:50/mi
Marathon: 5:57/mi

sue088

264 posts since
Aug 9, 1998

17. May 20, 2006 9:57 AM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

5k--- 5:53 pace
5mile--- 6:05 pace
10k--- 6:06 pace (old PR)
15k--- 6:22
10mile--6:21
half-- 6:22
marathon-- 6:43

someone said that you can run a marathon 43 seconds slower than 5k and 32 seconds slower than 10k pace. So I am "still" underachieving at the marathon distance considering this is the distance I train for.

spinach

112 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

18. May 21, 2006 6:10 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

quote:<HR>Originally posted by spinach:
1 mile 5:29
5k 18:52 (6:04)
5 mile 31:14 (6:15)
half 1:27:20 (6:40)
25k 1:45:20 (6:47)
marathon 3:07:15 (7:09)

The marathon time was the oldest (a year and a half ago) and I hope to better it somewhat this weekend.<HR>

Let me change this to

marathon 3:01:33 (6:56)

jfkjmk

10 posts since
Dec 31, 2002

19. May 21, 2006 7:01 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

Strong to the finish, spinach.........

Within the past year.....

5K 19:04
10k 39:24
15K 60:24
Half 1:24:49
Marathon 3:05:10

michael wade

18 posts since
Feb 18, 2003

20. May 22, 2006 8:59 AM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

Yeah. I think I could run a 3:07:15 on a flat course. But those other times are wayyyyyyyy out of my reach.

I think the 3:07 PR is a bit on the soft side. I ran it at Boston last year in the heat. I think I was in sub 3:05 shape for Boston. Perhaps better on a flatter course. Who knows.

BTW, I wouldn't say the other times are out of your reach. You aren't that far away. You're only :18/mile off the 1/2 mar & :30/mile off the 5 mile.

Keep workin' it.

cliff202j

82 posts since
Nov 10, 2005

21. May 23, 2006 1:09 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

5K: 5:33/Mile (2006)
10K: 5:47 (2006)
15K: 6:06 (2005)
Half: 7:51 (2001)
Full: 7:02 (2005)

obsessor

488 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

22. May 23, 2006 2:01 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

Within the last year, relative to mile pace.

sec/mile slower than a mile race pace:
5k, +16sec.
10k, +43sec. (very soft)
10mi. +46sec.
1/2mar. +53sec.
20mi. +61sec.
mar +64sec.
66k +152sec. (ugly)

tarpon

357 posts since
Nov 29, 2007

23. May 23, 2006 3:45 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

(All 2006, not ancient history)

5k: 19:51
10m: 65:35
1/2 marathon: 1:26:35
marathon: 3:08:45 (Boston)

Deco

104 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

24. May 24, 2006 8:37 AM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

All within last 18 months...

5M: 5:51/Mile (2005)
10M: 6:06 ; +0:15 (2006)
Half: 6:23 ; + 0:17 (2005)
Full: 6:57 ; +0:34 (2006)

wndctyrnr

11 posts since
Oct 8, 2003

25. May 24, 2006 10:06 AM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

1Mile- 5:58 (1999)
5K- 21:03 (2005)
HM-136:07 (2005)
Marathon 3:38:32 (2005)

Zapatista

87 posts since
Dec 14, 2007

26. May 24, 2006 10:17 AM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

5K: 18:56 6:05.6
10K: 39:06 6:17.6 +12.0
10m: 66:10 6:37.0 + 0:19.4
1/2: 1:27.28 6:40 +3.0
m: 3:11:04 7:17.2 +37.2

kiwirunning

12 posts since
Jun 8, 2005

27. May 26, 2006 8:48 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

3km - 9:53 - 3:16/km
5km - 16:41 - 3:20/km - +04sec
10km - 34:22 - 3:26/km - +06sec
15km - 55:19 - 3:41/km - +15sec
42.2km - 2:56:39 - 4:11/km - +30sec

start falling off the pace in the marathon although it was a negative split so I hope one day to lower that time significantly if I can only string a decent period of time of high milage together without injury.

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

Never, never, never give up.

Guest

28. Jun 3, 2006 12:39 PM

in response to: dmichaelp

Re: Forget Calculators: Actual Results?

I'm in the same boat as some of the above posters; I suffered from a lack of overall endurance in my first marathon. My other times mostly follow my VDOT predictions (~ 48.5) from Daniels' formula:

1 mile - 5:58
2 mile - 12:40
5k - 20:38
10k - 42:44
10 mile - 1:11:09
20k - 1:28:54
25k - 1:54:00
30k - 2:17:53
Marathon - 3:30:48

I should have run a 3:17:00 marathon, according to the charts. I dropped off at mile 19 when I tried to catch back up with my 3:20 pace group after a bathroom break at mile 15.

Go to original post 1 2 Previous Next

Go to original post

Actions

More Like This

New Runners

Training

Competition

Age Groups

Fitness

The Lighter Side

Feedback

Related Links