quote:<HR>Originally posted by Desert Tortoise:
When fit athletes bonk at the 30 Km mark, it's because they just ran too close to their lactate threshold.<HR>
I resemble that remark. Here's what it looked like:
Mile: HR / Time / Delta (from 8:23 pace)
1: 154 / 8:12.8 / -0:10.7
2: 161 / 8:16.3 / -0:17.8
3: 162 / 8:26.2 / -0:15.1
4: 160 / 8:09.7 / -0:28.8
5: 160 / 8:14.2 / -0:38.1
6: 160 / 8:22.8 / -0:38.7
7: 159 / 8:19.5 / -0:42.7
8: 158 / 8:34.8 / -0:31.4
9: 158 / 8:07.6 / -0:47.2
10: 158 / 8:09.1 / -1:01.6
11: 159 / 8:34.8 / -0:50.2
12: 160 / 8:36.4 / -0:37.3
13: 158 / 7:54.7 / -1:06.0
14: 158 / 8:10.9 / -1:18.6
15: 159 / 8:22.9 / -1:19.1
16: 160 / 9:00.3 / -0:42.3
17: 158 / 8:28.9 / -0:36.9
18: 158 / 9:00.2 / -0:00.1
19: 157 / 9:23.9 / 1:00.3
20: 155 / 9:32.1 / 2:09.0
21: 147 / 10:38.1 / 4:23.6
22: 146 / 10:16.3 / 6:16.5
23: 142 / 11:07.0 / 9:00.0
24: 142 / 10:38.8 / 11:15.3
25: 143 / 10:57.4 / 13:49.3
26: 142 / 11:12.4 / 16:38.2
26.2: 155 / 1:54.2 / 16:42.3
Finish: 3:56:42 (goal was 3:40).
CCM '04. Pretty obvious I'd say. Simply not enough miles training for that race and not enough race-specific (in this case, hills) mileage.
I've since acquired and read both Advanced Marathoning and Daniel's Running Formula. These books really complement each other so I'll recommend them again even though they've already been mentioned. DRF is background material for AM. There is some overlap between the two so if you buy only one, make it AM.
I'm currently following Pfitz's 24/55 plan and hope to run a 3:30 at the obxmarathon with it. Depending upon how I do I'd like my next marathon to be a BQ (3:15 for me).
Anyway, training is going great so far. I started my base building in March and the gradual mileage increase has me running a lot more miles a lot more comfortably than I ever have before.
About HRMs. I wear an HRM on my long runs and in races. On long runs it's basically just to chart my performance and to keep me from killing myself on hot summer days. During races it's to keep me from running the first few miles much too fast. Here's what a successful use of an HRM got me in my last half:
1: 7:47 / 155 (HR)
2: 7:35 / 166
3: 7:35 / 165
4: 7:30 / 165
5: 7:37 / 165
6: 7:54 / 163
7: 7:54 / 161
8: 7:39 / 159
9: 7:41 / 163
10: 7:36 / 163
11: 7:44 / 162
12: 7:53 / 162
13: 7:41 / 164
.1: 0:43 / 168
Good luck,
j.
http://This message has been edited by jaysoffian (edited Jun-29-2006).