active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Click to view Jay Soffian (Cool Running)'s profile Pro 170 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
16. Dec 20, 2007 9:49 PM in response to: conflan
quote:<HR>Originally posted by Desert Tortoise:
When fit athletes bonk at the 30 Km mark, it's because they just ran too close to their lactate threshold.<HR>


I resemble that remark. Here's what it looked like:

Mile: HR / Time / Delta (from 8:23 pace)
1: 154 / 8:12.8 / -0:10.7
2: 161 / 8:16.3 / -0:17.8
3: 162 / 8:26.2 / -0:15.1
4: 160 / 8:09.7 / -0:28.8
5: 160 / 8:14.2 / -0:38.1
6: 160 / 8:22.8 / -0:38.7
7: 159 / 8:19.5 / -0:42.7
8: 158 / 8:34.8 / -0:31.4
9: 158 / 8:07.6 / -0:47.2
10: 158 / 8:09.1 / -1:01.6
11: 159 / 8:34.8 / -0:50.2
12: 160 / 8:36.4 / -0:37.3
13: 158 / 7:54.7 / -1:06.0
14: 158 / 8:10.9 / -1:18.6
15: 159 / 8:22.9 / -1:19.1
16: 160 / 9:00.3 / -0:42.3
17: 158 / 8:28.9 / -0:36.9
18: 158 / 9:00.2 / -0:00.1
19: 157 / 9:23.9 / 1:00.3
20: 155 / 9:32.1 / 2:09.0
21: 147 / 10:38.1 / 4:23.6
22: 146 / 10:16.3 / 6:16.5
23: 142 / 11:07.0 / 9:00.0
24: 142 / 10:38.8 / 11:15.3
25: 143 / 10:57.4 / 13:49.3
26: 142 / 11:12.4 / 16:38.2
26.2: 155 / 1:54.2 / 16:42.3

Finish: 3:56:42 (goal was 3:40).

CCM '04. Pretty obvious I'd say. Simply not enough miles training for that race and not enough race-specific (in this case, hills) mileage.

I've since acquired and read both Advanced Marathoning and Daniel's Running Formula. These books really complement each other so I'll recommend them again even though they've already been mentioned. DRF is background material for AM. There is some overlap between the two so if you buy only one, make it AM.

I'm currently following Pfitz's 24/55 plan and hope to run a 3:30 at the obxmarathon with it. Depending upon how I do I'd like my next marathon to be a BQ (3:15 for me).

Anyway, training is going great so far. I started my base building in March and the gradual mileage increase has me running a lot more miles a lot more comfortably than I ever have before.

About HRMs. I wear an HRM on my long runs and in races. On long runs it's basically just to chart my performance and to keep me from killing myself on hot summer days. During races it's to keep me from running the first few miles much too fast. Here's what a successful use of an HRM got me in my last half:

1: 7:47 / 155 (HR)
2: 7:35 / 166
3: 7:35 / 165
4: 7:30 / 165
5: 7:37 / 165
6: 7:54 / 163
7: 7:54 / 161
8: 7:39 / 159
9: 7:41 / 163
10: 7:36 / 163
11: 7:44 / 162
12: 7:53 / 162
13: 7:41 / 164
.1: 0:43 / 168

Good luck,

j.

http://This message has been edited by jaysoffian (edited Jun-29-2006).
Click to view MM Hippo's profile Legend 202 posts since
Apr 28, 2006
19. Jul 10, 2006 3:51 PM in response to: conflan
I'm going to go way out on a limb here and make a very unconventional suggestion: run a marathon as part of your training.

The problem with your original premise, and the problem with all the pace calculators out there, is that there are some serious real new problems that hit you in the jump from 21K to 42K. IMO these are far more significant than the jump from 10K to 21K -- maybe more than the jump from 5K to 21K. A good training program addresses all of these to an extent but it still leaves many first time marathoners needing a lot of luck to hit their race-day goals.

So with a three hour target find another (similar) marathon 2/3 of the way through your training program and shoot for a 3:30. Make the entire purpose of the exercise to hit an evenly-paced time. This experience should not tax you that much, and will basically remove a lot of the unpleasant race-day surprises.

I'll add that this suggestion needs all sorts of disclaimers on it. This is NOT common advice and lots of people will tell you that running a slow marathon will require like 15 weeks of tape/recovery and leave you injured, burnt out and totally ruin your training plan. Whatever. I'm just saying that the little details you encounter in a real marathon on race day can sometimes derail you.

Another disclaimer is that DT's advice is way better than mine, he's so much faster and more experienced than I am.

It's just that as someone who runs a lot of marathons right in the range where there are a lot of BQ thresholds I see a lot of disasters. The people usually pull away from me at mile 5-10, when I talk to them I'm always impressed by how well trained they are, how they run double or triple the mileage I do, follow a rigorous training plan with real workouts (unlike me.)

But there is an incredible trend I'm getting accustomed to: I have to bite my tongue to keep from saying "see you at mile 23!" because I invariably do, and they don't look so hot then. At the finish line they are invariably crushed, and typically about 12-20 minutes slower than their goals.

I'm not sure if adding a "practice marathon" to a strong training plan would help to prevent that, hence the disclaimers.

-hippo-



------------------
ugly mug[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view wayfool's profile Pro 100 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
20. Jul 19, 2006 4:34 PM in response to: conflan
Conflan,

It's amazing how similar our situations are. My goal is also run about 3 hr marathon in mid-October. I have yet to run a 10 mile race, but I ran a 7.5 mile in 47:27, and a half marathon best of 1:26 on about 40 mpw. I ran Miami back in January attempting a 3:10 pace and ended up with a 3:19. I think the heat and humidity definitely had an effect, but I started to slow around mile 18 or so, which suggests I had been running to close to anaerobic threshold, as other posters have suggested. I also think that 40 mpw is just not enough time on your feet. My basic training plan was a VO2Max/interval workout on Tuesday, 5-10 mile tempo run on Thursday, and a long run on the weekend, peaking out at 22 miles.

Clearly, the two things lacking in my program was the mileage, and longer tempo runs in which you're really simulating race conditions. I would recommend definitely getting up to the 60 mpw for at least three weeks. Also, incorporate at least one recovery week for every 2-3 weeks of increased mileage so you give your body time to recover. I think one of the key workouts I will be adding this time around are runs of between 15-20 miles in which you start at jogging pace (7:30-8:00 pace) and ramp up to marathon pace (6:50-7:00) for the last 5-10 miles. As you proceed in your training program, gradually increase the marathon pace portion.

I found these two websites particularly helpful. One is an actual training program of a guy who ran a 3:01 at the Hartford Marathon. His mileage peak is a bit up there, which I don't recommend you emulating, but you get the gist from his training schedule. The 2nd is a training schedule by Kevin Beck outlining the judicious use of these fast finish long runs that I mentioned before. It seems a bit monotonous but I'm convinced these are the key workouts to running a fast marathon.

3:01 actual training schedule
http://www.kemibe.com/kf.htm[/URL" target="_blank">

Marathon paced long runs
http://www.runningtimes.com/rt/articles/?id=4835[/URL" target="_blank">


Best of luck to you and keep me posted and how your training is going.

------------------
Click to view nike84's profile Pro 183 posts since
Aug 13, 2005
21. Jul 19, 2006 4:54 PM in response to: conflan
quote:<HR>Originally posted by conflan:
I am training for my first marathon in the middle of October. I would like to run around the 3 hour mark. I have done some competitive 10 milers and 2 half marathons and I have used one of those on line projectors that predicts your time from prevoius races and it gives me a time for the marathon of a couple of minutes over the 3 hours.

I posted this on " Newbie" and didn't get much of a positive response, indeed some thought I was setting too high a target.

Can anyone recommend a good 3 hour training program.

Thanks for any assistance.

The Optimist
<HR>


Looking at your times and your training schedule there are a couple of things I would think about. Don't ramp your mileage too much and probably a marathon in the 3:10 -3:15 range would be a good goal. I'"ve run 2 sub 2:30's and found that a combination of long runs(18-22) miles, tempo or 5k/10k races, intervals of 1 mile -2000 meters worked well. You might want to cut back on the intervals a bit and just do a run of 8-12 miles. I thinkI'm in agreement with Desert Tortoise on his advice. Just focus on getting a marathon under your belt. The marathon is a different race to run then a 10k or a 1/2 marathon. It can really go well for you or it can come back right at you. Have a great race and good luck.
Click to view kudzurunner's profile Legend 523 posts since
Dec 6, 2007
22. Jul 19, 2006 5:35 PM in response to: conflan
MM Hippo:

I love your advice and wholeheartedly second it. After recovering from mono back in the early 80s, I knew that I wanted to run a fast marathon--which for a middling 25 year old back then meant breaking 2:50. I trained all summer, then did exactly as you suggested and ran a "test marathon" in mid-September, not all out, at what turned out to be 3:00:45. A flat, low-stress race, actually. My notes tell me that I ran 7:18 pace for the first 5 miles, then accelerated up to cruising speed and ran between 6:45 and 6:55 pace for the remainder. I reminded myself of what the distance was like--I'd run two previous marathons and a DNF, 17 miles @ 6:30 pace, a disaster--and I set a PR by 6 minutes.

Then, in late November, I was ready to hammer. I slightly overdid it and missed 2:50 by a couple of minutes (well, 3:30), but who could complain about a second consecutive 7:00 PR?

I learned valuable lessons from all this. One is, it's possible to run a practice marathon without killing yourself, and doing so helps remind you just how long the distance is and how important patience and steady pacing really are. Second, a fast marathon--meaning, an optimal marathon that accords with, say, McMillan's calculator--is a whole 'nother kettle of fish. Or rather, it's an unexpectedly hard fish to land.

So hoping to optimize in a very first marathon outing, no matter what the 10-mile and half-marathon times say, is hoping for an awful lot--too much, I'd say.

It is FAR preferable, in my book, to reach twenty miles the first time out and realize that you've got slightly more in the tank than you'd hoped--i.e., that you've run a conservative, slightly sub-optimal race--than to do it the other way, which is, as you say, the way that far too many people who base their racing on calculators and crossed fingers tend to take. Better to have fun the first time around, learn something about the distance, and then and only then really try to hone the thing.

One for the money, two for the show.....

Then, and only then: go cat go.
Click to view aharmer's profile Legend 460 posts since
May 25, 2005
23. Jul 24, 2006 11:15 AM in response to: conflan
Conflan,

I'll give you an idea for AFTER your October marathon, because you're close enough now that you probably don't want to start something completely different. Your times indicate that a sub-3 marathon is absolutely within reach and just a matter of time. The question is whether you have the aerobic capacity to do it right now. Many marathoners hit the dreaded "Wall" around 20 miles due to glycogen depletion.

When you have time, go over to the Basic Training section and check out the Maffetone low HR training thread. A guy with the screen name leitnerj started this thread a long time ago, and he has put together a FAQ section accessed through his posts. Take a look and see what you think. It involves running much slower than most people normally do, building your aerobic system and training your body to burn more fat, less glycogen at faster paces. It's not for everybody, but many people including myself have had great success. I must say my success is only theoretical at this point because I've not put it to the test in another marathon yet, but I've knocked a minute off my average training pace staying at the same HR.

My goal at Boston this year was to break 3:00. I cruised through 20 miles at 3:00 pace and hit the wall, struggling home to 3:09. I had done all the long runs with fast finishes, tempo runs, you name it. I realized that it wasn't going to be possible to train much harder than I did for that race, I had to find a way to train smarter. That's when I came across the Maffetone thread. At this point I don't know if it's actually "smarter" or not, but I already feel that I could go out and do my 3:00 marathon with only 2 months of solid aerobic training. Best of luck in October!

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view JPGarland's profile Legend 780 posts since
Dec 7, 2007
24. Jul 24, 2006 9:10 PM in response to: conflan
I don't know if this was mentioned. I am using the Daniels' Running Formula. One thing he does (I don't know about Advanced Marathoning) is provides appropriate pace for all workouts based upon your current condition, from a recent race. So it is not a question of I need to run X to run Y, but I am in shape to run X so that's the pace I'll run. As your fitness improves, the paces drop.

------------------
"You know how to run, don't you? You just put one foot in front of the other -- and go."

Me[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view wayfool's profile Pro 100 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
25. Jul 28, 2006 12:32 PM in response to: conflan
Here's another post/blog that I found particularly helpful. Excellent explanations and analogies on complex physiological processes.

http://www.42-195.org/hadd/part1.htm[/URL" target="_blank">

Does anyone have any info on this Charles Hadd character? Does he still exist?