active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
8 Replies Last post: Sep 4, 2006 10:14 AM by Jim McDannel  
Click to view 92heelgrad's profile Pro 180 posts since
Oct 9, 2005
Login to Reply

Aug 26, 2006 10:35 PM

Tell Me About Steamtown

Okay, I am running Chicago Oct 22nd, desperately trying to BQ someday. I ran Chicago last year in 3:40, but I am very confident that I can do at least a 3:30 this year if not a little faster. But...I am a greedy man, I ache to make Boston one day, and now I see what appears to be this little mid-sized gem, the Steamtown Marathon. It has 955 feet of net vertical descent over the course, a quad killer perhaps, but also very conducive to speed.

So I would like to know, has anybody here run that race? How fast is it? How much time can a course like that lop off for a good but not elite runner like me?
Click to view jpattee's profile Amateur 30 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
1. Aug 27, 2006 3:59 PM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
I ran Steamtown in 2004. At about 20 miles I was on pace for a 3:40 and my legs went...ended up 4:10. The majority drop in elevation all happens in the first 6 or 7 miles. All that early downhill running really hammers the quads. So, don't make the mistake I made and expect a gradual decline that is spread out over 26 miles. Train correctly for it (uphill and downhill runs), run the first stretch using your watch so you don't go out to fast and you could put down a pretty good time. Plenty of runners from my area love Steamtown. I plan on going back properly trained next year to see what I can do.
Click to view sue088's profile Community Moderator 264 posts since
Aug 9, 1998
2. Aug 27, 2006 7:47 PM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
quote:<HR>Originally posted by jpattee:
I ran Steamtown in 2004. At about 20 miles I was on pace for a 3:40 and my legs went...ended up 4:10. The majority drop in elevation all happens in the first 6 or 7 miles. All that early downhill running really hammers the quads. So, don't make the mistake I made and expect a gradual decline that is spread out over 26 miles. Train correctly for it (uphill and downhill runs), run the first stretch using your watch so you don't go out to fast and you could put down a pretty good time. Plenty of runners from my area love Steamtown. I plan on going back properly trained next year to see what I can do.<HR>


is it at altitude also? something else that you have to consider with some of these "downhill" races is that alot of them start higher than many of us are use to. I'm dealing with "sucking wind" right now vacationing.
Click to view Southern Man's profile Legend 757 posts since
Apr 19, 2006
3. Aug 27, 2006 9:04 PM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
quote:<HR>Originally posted by sue:
is it at altitude also? something else that you have to consider with some of these "downhill" races is that alot of them start higher than many of us are use to. I'm dealing with "sucking wind" right now vacationing. <HR>



No, many of those downhill races at altitude are in Colorado or elsewhere in the west. Steamtown is in Scranton, PA. Altitude is a non-factor.

I haven't run it but am doing it this fall. By reputation is is excellently run...one of those race put on by runners for runners. That, plus the altitude drop, were the important factors for me.

Southern Man

------------------
We're on a road to nowhere. Come on along.
Click to view mahanska's profile Expert 40 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
4. Aug 27, 2006 10:17 PM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
I ran my PR at Steamtown in 2004 (3:24:24). The expo speakers warn you not to go out too fast for the first 7 miles. As was mentioned, most, if not all the drop in elevation occurs in the 1st 7-8 miles I think. The rest is reasonably flat, but there is 1 or 2 of the toughest hills on the course at around mile 23 through 25. The final 3/4 mile is perfect decline and makes you pick up speed toward the end.

Train on downhills and don't go out too fast, and you'll do real well.
Click to view Southern Man's profile Legend 757 posts since
Apr 19, 2006
5. Aug 27, 2006 10:20 PM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
What do people think is too fast? It is a conundrum of not going out too fast vs. taking what the course give you. I am thinking of aiming for 10s/mile faster than goal pace over the first 7 miles. Do people think that's too conservative? Not conservative enough?

Southern Man

------------------
We're on a road to nowhere. Come on along.
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
6. Aug 28, 2006 7:35 AM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
I ran Chicago in 2004 (2:51) and Steamtown (2:46) in 2005. Neither of these was a PR and I was coming back fro an injury at Chicago. As I recall much of Steamtown's descent is in initial miles and I did go out pretty fast and slowed considerably by the end. It's a fast course, but I don't think the downhill gains you too much time unless you are really good at running down hills... As a point of reference I ran Virgina Beach which is pretty flat this Spring at 2:47 (with headwind) - so I don't believe Scranton's downhill helped me much... That said, one of my running buddies had a huge PR in the 3:10s at Steamtown and many people use it as a BQ. Myself, I think I would prefer a course that is flat or rolling hills or only slightly downhill for a PR.

Ray
Click to view RCL043's profile Pro 180 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
7. Sep 4, 2006 9:18 AM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
I'm doing it for the 9th time this year. Great crowd support. We were once cheered in the pre-dawn hours going by in a bus on the way to the start.

I really can't add much to what has been said about the down hills. Four of my five best times were on this course. I recall that between the 3rd and 4th mile you're almost falling out of the mountain. There are some hills near the end, so save something. They altered the course to eliminate some of them, but not all of them.

Another change I like is the rail-to-trails legs, which extend for about four+ miles between miles 14 and 19. Not only did they eliminate some rolling hills, but they're a scenic diversion from the road and the spectators.
Click to view Jim McDannel's profile Amateur 12 posts since
Jan 1, 2006
8. Sep 4, 2006 10:14 AM in response to: 92heelgrad
Re: Tell Me About Steamtown
Hi There,
My name is Jim, Im also running Steam Town this year and a few from our club are comming as well,

We all were asking the same question how fast is steam town, After contacting the race director, He turned my question over to Jon Sinclair, One of the coaches for Steam Town, in his email he basically told me to expect 0 to 7 minutes from the course, It was also mentioned to start very slow like already told above,

I appreciated his email but that was not the answer I was looking for, I was hoping to get more from the course beacuse it was all down hill, Trying for Boston myself.

Still I took it a step futher and compared the times from other finishers from last years times, and compared the same people from other marathons around the country, yep he's right on the average its about 7 minutes...

Hope that answers a few questions Jim
Good Luck, I'll come in around 3:30 myself,

Just Look for a small group of people freezing to death with sun tans, that will be us ( From Florida ) Burned up now though