active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
13 Replies Last post: Oct 30, 2006 4:50 PM by rbbmoose  
Click to view wanderingrunner's profile Amateur 25 posts since
Nov 1, 2005
Login to Reply

Oct 23, 2006 6:02 PM

"M pace runs"- how accurate are they?

I'm curious...I did a 25K yesterday at what I thought was my M pace. It was the first time I have done one of these M pace runs. I did it with no taper, felt really comfortable the entire way with only minor leg soreness after mile 13. Time: 1:42:55- 6:37 pace (2:53 pace for marathon)

My previous race times for this year are a 1:24 for the half and a 17:43 5K.

I'm doing my second marathon, Philly, in four weeks. My original goal for the race was 3 hrs. but the 25K time dictates otherwise. Whats everyone else's experience with M pace runs as marathon predictors?

Craig
Click to view Southern Man's profile Legend 757 posts since
Apr 19, 2006
1. Oct 23, 2006 9:19 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
I do not think they are accurate predictors, indeed I don't think they are intended to be. I ran a 14 miler about 10 sec/mile faster than I was able to hold in my marathon. These are training runs, not predictors. For that, use races.

Southern Man


------------------
We're on a road to nowhere. Come on along.
Click to view milkbaby004's profile Legend 464 posts since
Jul 28, 2003
2. Oct 23, 2006 10:06 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
I agree with Southern that they are probably not very much use as a prediction tool. You are better off with calculating the equivalent time marathon time off of an underdistance race (HM or longer).

However, I do think MP is good training for the marathon. I run a midweek MP run of 13 miles by feel and keep track of the mile splits in my log. As the times come down, I believe it is a decent sign that I am getting more racing fit for the marathon. I think it might work as a negative indicator -- if you can't do 20-25k at your MP fairly easily, you might be in trouble trying to maintain that pace for an entire marathon even considering that you've tapered for the race.
Click to view ljwoodw's profile Legend 550 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
3. Oct 23, 2006 10:33 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
I'm going to take the contrary position to many of the preceding posters and suggest that they can be very helpful as predictors. If I get to the point where I can run 14 miles or so at marathon pace (no taper, no carboload) without feeling totally spent, I'm pretty sure I can hold it in a marathon given reasonable race conditions. I get a similar feeling if I can do 10 milesat MP to finish a 20-22 mile run.

I also think they are one of the most valuable workouts you can do to prepare for a marathon.

BUT, a caveat: there may be a few reasons that they worked well as predictors for me. I generally have lots of 22-mile runs under my belt (with no carbohydrates) before I toe the line so the time-on-feet doesn't catch my by surprise. I also run higher mileage than a lot of my peers, so that in terms of distance, 14 miles is all in a day's work. Marathon pace for me is also very fast relative to my other paces, so my being able to run 25K at MP might be more meaningful than your being able to run 25K at MP (the flip side being my being able to run 3K at 5K pace would be less meaningful than your ability to do the same)

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view Born to Run060's profile Legend 557 posts since
Jul 1, 2002
4. Oct 23, 2006 11:38 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
I think shooting for 3 hours is how you might want to go out. Pick it up at mile 15-20 if you feel relaxed.

I would be concerned that you felt muscle soreness at mile 13. How's your diet? I would look at the foods that you're eating. Are they un-processed, fruits, veggies, spices and herbs?

Anyway, I don't think you can handle the pace if you feel soreness at mile 13 of a MP run.

Good luck!
Click to view stillgreen38's profile Pro 60 posts since
Oct 6, 2006
6. Oct 24, 2006 10:01 AM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
ljwoodw touched on an important point for preparation: long runs. Better than your "25K @ MP predictor workout" would be ljwoodw's 22 miler with the final 10 at MP - can you this? With only 2 x 20 milers under your belt 4 weeks out, I would try to squeeze in a fast-finish 23-24 by 3 weeks out. Try ramping up to MP for the last 12 miles with minimal stoppage time for sport drink. It may not be a predictor, but at least better train you for that final 10K push.

Another suggestion is the 10x1 mile (2:00 rest) @ 10 K-10 mile race pace my training group does 12 days out. Your training appears to be sufficient to be able to execute and recover from this. It's a great workout that trains toughness and will make marathon pace seem like a massage.
Click to view fredurie's profile Legend 1,979 posts since
Aug 21, 2002
7. Dec 20, 2007 10:00 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ljwoodw:
I'm going to take the contrary position to many of the preceding posters and suggest that they can be very helpful as predictors. If I get to the point where I can run 14 miles or so at marathon pace (no taper, no carboload) without feeling totally spent, I'm pretty sure I can hold it in a marathon given reasonable race conditions. I get a similar feeling if I can do 10 milesat MP to finish a 20-22 mile run.

I also think they are one of the most valuable workouts you can do to prepare for a marathon.

BUT, a caveat: there may be a few reasons that they worked well as predictors for me. I generally have lots of 22-mile runs under my belt (with no carbohydrates) before I toe the line so the time-on-feet doesn't catch my by surprise. I also run higher mileage than a lot of my peers, so that in terms of distance, 14 miles is all in a day's work. Marathon pace for me is also very fast relative to my other paces, so my being able to run 25K at MP might be more meaningful than your being able to run 25K at MP (the flip side being my being able to run 3K at 5K pace would be less meaningful than your ability to do the same)

<HR>


This guy is getting it done.

17 min. 5k = 2:45 and not a 2:35 at Boston

Endurance Workouts Pace/Mile Pace/K
Recovery Jogs 7:50 to 8:20
Long Runs 6:50 to 7:50
Easy Runs 6:50 to 7:20



http://This message has been edited by fredurie (edited Oct-24-2006).
Click to view WI MTP's profile Legend 461 posts since
Jan 7, 2006
8. Oct 24, 2006 12:11 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
Leon is right in his own way. But all that we look for are indicators of which pace we should attempt to make our race day MP. Reality is that MP would be different almost every day, week, month - Our bodies have something a little different as way of potential each day.

The accuracy of predictors or inaccuracey usually revolves around your mileage (aka General Aerobic Fitness) and the length of the race used as an indicator. A 1/2 marathon is a better predictor than a 5k. But a half marathon can be a lousey predictor at times.

2 local guys in my area run 1:17:46 and 1:17:47 - 1/2 marathon 3 weeks before the marathon we are all running. So I expect to see them around during the race or be behind them. My best 1/2 is a 1:22:18 (Way back in May). Marathon comes - I run a 2:45 and they run a 2:56 and a 3:05.

What was the difference - I sure the heck don't know - I only know me. Because I run lots-o-miles and what ever else I do - I am able to hold a pace longer even when fatigued.

So to answer the question - You take a bunch of data - 1) all you race times 2) All your workouts and 3) How you feel the day of the race and make your theory of what MP should be and then you test that theory.
Click to view Born to Run060's profile Legend 557 posts since
Jul 1, 2002
9. Oct 24, 2006 3:34 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
quote:<HR>Originally posted by stillgreen38:
ljwoodw touched on an important point for preparation: long runs. Better than your "25K @ MP predictor workout" would be ljwoodw's 22 miler with the final 10 at MP - can you this? <HR>


I did this with the last 5 at pace. It was right on for me.
Click to view kudzurunner's profile Legend 523 posts since
Dec 6, 2007
11. Oct 30, 2006 1:29 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
quote:<HR>Originally posted by stillgreen38:


Another suggestion is the 10x1 mile (2:00 rest) @ 10 K-10 mile race pace my training group does 12 days out. Your training appears to be sufficient to be able to execute and recover from this. It's a great workout that trains toughness and will make marathon pace seem like a massage. [/B]<HR>


Stillgreen:

I'd like to hear more about the 10 x 1 mile workout. I'd also like some guidance (and hope I'm not hijacking). I'm pointing towards St. Jude in Memphis, 5 weeks away. I ran 3:39 in Tupelo in early September, a mild disappointment after hoping to hold straight 8:00s for 20 and then pick up for a sub-3:30. I took one week off, then built back to 50+ mpw over the past seven weeks. I've done a lot of hillwork and it's clearly had an effect. (For the record, I've run three half marathons at sub 1:33 over the past 18 months; I'm certainly in that kind of shape now, or better.) I've over the past several weeks I've run 5 miles @ 7:05 (tempo) and 10 miles @ 7:36 (MP+), using a HR monitor and running a controlled effort. Right now I'd judge that my half marathon pace is 7:00 on the nose. Still, I'm planning on running very conservatively, going out in straight 8:00s for the first 15 before slowly picking it up.

My questions would be, where should I pitch my 10 x 1 mile pace? My 10K PR pace is 6:35; I haven't run a 10-miler. I'll probably just go for 7:00 miles. Would that make sense.

Also: What sort of warmup/warmdown do you do before this run. I'd assume 20-30 min easy on each end + strides prior.

Finally: Do you substitute this workout for your next-to-last long run, two weeks out? With warmup and warmdown, I could easily make is 15-16 total, and that's what I'd ordinarily do.

Thanks.
Click to view stillgreen38's profile Pro 60 posts since
Oct 6, 2006
12. Oct 30, 2006 4:29 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
With apologies to wanderingrunner for the combination shameless plug/hijack:

Firstly, you should know that my group precedes this Tues night workout (12 days out from race) with an 8x 1mile (2:00 rest), and a 7x 1mile (2:00 rest) workout one and two weeks prior to the 10x 1mile (2:00 rest), respectively. We run them on a well-calibrated pedestrian/bike path straightaway in a park with a gentle roll and slight hills at either end, as would be typically encountered in a road race. It is VERY helpful to do these with a friend or two who plans to complete ALL the reps.

For warmup, we jog a mile, stretch, then do three or four 50m strideouts. The cooldown is a half-full mile jog + stretching. The workout is always scheduled 2 days after the Sunday long run with a rest day in between. The following days (Wed) are just 5-6 miles easy.

It's a 10x1 mile (2:00 rest) aerobic threshold workout, so ideally you want what your 10 K pace would be on THAT day (with no taper), or round it up to what you think you are capable of producing for ALL the repeats. Your lactate threshold pace is supposed to be what you could only just hold for an hour, so you want to try to be faster than this by as much as possible. For example, my best recent half was 1:24:01 and I was shooting for a sub-3 hour marathon, so I did the 10x 1mile repeats in 6:00 each, plus/minus 2-3 seconds. On a track I would pitch for a little faster (5:50-5:55?).

As for long runs leading up to race day, we do a 20-22 miler three weeks out, followed by 16 and 12 the following weekends, respectively. All of these finish with some marathon pacing, the amount of which depending on your fitness.

Incidentally, I imagine the consensus on this forum would be that your slow marathon times (relative to 10K, half mary) might be due to a deficiency in quality long runs this training cycle (last 20 weeks-ish).
Click to view rbbmoose's profile Legend 324 posts since
Oct 12, 2007
13. Oct 30, 2006 4:50 PM in response to: wanderingrunner
Re: "M pace runs"- how accurate are they?
WanderingRunner... I have similar race times for this year (1:22 half and 17:35 5K) although I'm an infrequent racer, and also have a 59:00 10M - I'll be running Philly and shooting for something in the 2:40s...hopefully 2:45ish. My 14th marathon...

Your goal time of 3 hours sounds a bit soft to me, but I don't plan to know a whole lot about MP runs as a predictor... As a point of reference I did a 21M long run yesterday at 6:35 average .. but droppped last 3 miles down to MP (6:20, 15, 6:05) - felt relatively comfortable my legs are a bit sore and this may be agressive.

Enjoy your taper... I'll see you in Philly.

Ray