active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
Login to Reply
1 2 Previous Next
Click to view runninirish's profile Legend 233 posts since
Feb 26, 2007

Feb 26, 2007 8:58 PM

The Mythical Boston PR

My first post...I've got to say this is my favorite running site to lurk on...much better/nicer than some of the other ones (no names)...
So last June I qualified for Boston with a 3:10 on the nose...as soon as I crossed the finished line I began planning for a sub 3 in Boston...so my question to the wise, experienced runners...is dropping 10 mins on a harder course possible in this short of time? My training has been great (for me) and I feel I can do it...and if I can pull it off, what should be race strategy be? I've heard negative splits are unheard of in Boston...I usually race pretty smart, so I think I can stick to my pace...but do I go out in 1:30 and try to come home in 1:29? Or go out in 1:27 and plan for a fade? Sorry-lots of questions...I'm a Boston rook and only plan on taking one shot at this...so I'd like to get it right! Thanks!
Click to view leon2's profile Legend 347 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
1. Feb 26, 2007 9:16 PM in response to: runninirish
In 2004 the temperature reached 85 degrees.
Click to view paulmitch's profile Legend 308 posts since
Jul 9, 2007
2. Feb 26, 2007 9:22 PM in response to: runninirish
Well of course you can do it, but we no nothing about you. You ran 3:10 how many miles did you do/ How many miles a week are you running? Did you race any hilly half marathons? or any? Only you know what your training has been like.
Click to view PacerChris's profile Legend 763 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
3. Feb 26, 2007 9:26 PM in response to: runninirish
Ah, the innocence of the first timer...

First off congrats on your BQ. All your hard work paid off and your reward is the greatest race in the world!

My PR is Boston last year, and I've run the course several times. It took me awhile to figure it out - how fast can you go to take advantage of the early downhills without trashing your legs and being dead right after Heartbreak? I don't think I've ever neg. split Boston - I've really raced it only twice and I came pretty close last year (~30-40 second positive split). I wouldn't worry too much about negative splitting. My best satisfaction from my PR run was that I gauged it perfectly - had the race been .2 miles longer, I'd have walked the last.2! I think I oculd have perhaps gone a little faster in the first 15 miles and felt the same the last bit - this year I'm shooting for another PR and my goal is to go out about 1 minute faster than my target time (2:50 is the target, 1:24 for the first half). I think if you shot for a 1:28:30-1:29, that would be fast but not stupid-fast.

Read up on the course - don't worry about getting out on pace, the corral system is fantastic for that. Let the crowd slow you down the first 3-4 miles - you'll still probably be right around 7:00 pace anyway. If you're a good downhill runner, pay attention and use those when you can. Use these last several weeks to practice downhill running and have some good climbs late in your long runs.

Good luck!
Click to view bhearn's profile Legend 430 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
4. Feb 26, 2007 10:49 PM in response to: runninirish
What are some recent race times? Do they support 3:00? That's the first question to ask.

Re negative split, I think close to an even split is probably optimal. Last year I tried for a 2-minute negative split, and wound up with a 2-minute positive split. Conventional wisdom is that you can negative split if you run a smart race. But I think you would have to do everything right -- and that includes knowing exactly the target time you are capable of.

BTW... I BQ'ed in my first marathon, after 8 months of running, in 3:12:18. I trained harder for Boston than I did for my qualifier, and I was still improving; I got some nice PRs in tune-up races. And I studied the course completely anally. Nevertheless, I paced for what I thought would be a conservative 3:09. I knew I had no shot at 3:00, but I'd have liked to break 3:10. Result: 3:43, including 10 minutes in the aid station at the top of heartbreak hill. In spite of all my careful preparation, and improved fitness, I neglected to take temperature into consideration. It wasn't a real cooker - high of about 75, I think (2005). But it did me in.

Good luck! (And yes, I will still be trying to PR at Boston this year! Uh, modulo weather.)

Bob[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view ljwoodw's profile Legend 550 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
5. Feb 26, 2007 10:54 PM in response to: runninirish
If you're a good downhill runner, Boston doesn't have to be a slow course (at all). I'd definitely suggest doing out in 1:29-1:30. Miles 13-16 are very fast, and 21-26 CAN be fast, so there are definitely opportunities to make up some time there.

It really does depend where you are on the improvement curve. I PR'ed at Boston both times I've run it (and fully expect to do so again this year), but I PR 90% of the time that I race, perhaps since I've only been running since July 2004.
Click to view James H's profile Amateur 32 posts since
Aug 31, 2000
7. Feb 27, 2007 9:42 AM in response to: runninirish
quote:<HR>Originally posted by PacerChris:
Let the crowd slow you down the first 3-4 miles - you'll still probably be right around 7:00 pace anyway.<HR>


In my experience, the crowds are far more likely to pull you out too fast. Because of the corral system, there aren't any slowpokes up front to slow you down, and everyone is very excited to finally get going, and the first mile is <i>really</i> downhill, and the course widens up right after the starting line, and the combination inevitably proves too much temptation for many runners who should know better.

For at least the first five or six miles, if you feel like you're going too slow, you're going too fast. And if you feel like you're going the right pace, you're really going too fast.

You should feel like you're doing everything in your power to hold back, and you'll find your mile splits are right where they should be. My first Boston was the most conservative race I've ever run, and it was an eight minute PR.

Good Luck!
Click to view bhearn's profile Legend 430 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
8. Feb 27, 2007 11:57 AM in response to: runninirish
quote:<HR>Originally posted by runninirish:
I have run a 1/2 in 1:28, but that was last May...I haven't raced since last summer since I tend to race little and train lots when I have a priority race... Mybiggest concern is that there is no 1/2 marathon tune up race for me around here...any suggestions on a good workout to gauge just "where I'm at?" <HR>


If you can't find a half, at least try to find a 10K. That would be a better predictor than any workout.

It sounds like you could be in there, but really no way to know without a tune-up race.

Bob[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view dmichaelp's profile Pro 90 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
9. Feb 27, 2007 4:26 PM in response to: runninirish
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
11. Feb 27, 2007 6:14 PM in response to: runninirish
quote:<HR>Originally posted by runninirish:
I really feel that I'm ready for the uphills...having been reading and researching, I'm getting a little leary about the downhills, especially the early ones...with 7 weeks to go, what kind of things can I still do to prepare for them...besides run down a hill? (and repeat).

http://www.rrca.org/resources/articles/baasplit.html[/URL" target="_blank"> (that is COOL) thanks!

<HR>


I think the downhills are not particularly hard, but they beat you up because you're running so far. There is no way to totally prepare. Try to book a hotel with an escalator or practice walking down stairs backwards!
Click to view runscottyg's profile Amateur 10 posts since
Oct 29, 2007
12. Feb 27, 2007 6:21 PM in response to: runninirish
As others have stated for the first 5 or so miles you should feel like you're taking a walk. Keep your legs as loose as possible and relax. No matter what hold back. When you approaching Newton Lower falls around mile 15 really hold back. This is a steep down hill and if you hammer this section you'll be in trouble for what's about to come. Many people think the hills start after you make the turn at the fire station....WRONG!!! They really start about a mile back when your climbing over RTe 128 at mile 16. On a hot day this area can kill you because there is no shade. Once you've passed mile 21 it's time to let it rip, that is if you have anything left.

I've run Boston 21 times now and I haven't broken 3 hours since 96 but I'm going for it this year. My PR is in Boston and it was a thrill to get it there (2:46). I'll never get that again being almost 50 but I can still give it all I have.

There is a lot going on during the race that can distract you. It's best to wear a shirt that doesn't draw attention to yourself. I find that if I'm able to stay focused I burn a lot less energy.

As for negative splits...FORGETABOUTIT!!! As a percentage very few people are able to achieve this goal.

I hope this helps and good luck.

Maybe we can cross the finish line together in 2:59:59!!!
Click to view ljwoodw's profile Legend 550 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
13. Feb 27, 2007 10:56 PM in response to: runninirish
I just want to say that this thread is a classic case of...

DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS

I think that all the advice you're getting to hold back on the downhills is misguided. They are there, you darn well better take advantage of them. Because if you're not, you're probably using your quads as brakes (which is an eccentric motion). That, my friends, is what trashes them for the uphills.

In my opinion, go out fast. Unless you're absolutely ridiculous, your fitness will forgive you. Note that this is not the same advice I'd give for just any marathon. It is specific to Boston - on a flat course, by all means hold back early on.

Furthermore if you're the kind of runner that gets better as the distance gets longer (like me), then at no point during the race should it feel like a walk. Not in the first few miles, not ever. For some of us, marathon pace is very close to 10K pace. That means it's fast and should feel fast. I averaged 5:57's last year. 5:57 never feels "easy" to me.

I also found that attracting attention to myself was a good thing. I loved how people would shout out my name in particular since I had it written down my arm. It doesn't necessarily have to take away fro your focus. The adrenaline might be worth it. I sure thought it was.

And it's possible to run negative splits, even if you take the opening downhills hard: I ran slightly negative in 2005 and even in 2006.
Click to view aharmer's profile Legend 460 posts since
May 25, 2005
14. Feb 28, 2007 9:40 AM in response to: runninirish
I agree with ljwood, use the hills to your advantage without going too crazy. My goal last year was 3:00 and I ended up running 3:09 so my opinion may not be the most valid (although it was still a 6:00 PR). My problem wasn't the uphills or downhills, but rather a lack of aerobic conditioning that didn't allow me to maintain pace after about 21M.

I believe the perfect Boston would be to use the downhills of the first 16 miles to bank about 2:00 (about 0:07 per mile). Take the uphills easy so you're close to goal pace at about 21M, and maintain goal pace to the end. If you have to hammer those uphills to stay on pace you're in big trouble. Good luck to everybody going this year, wish I could be there with you!

------------------
My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

"Pain is temporary. Regret hurts forever."
hrmarathontraining.blogspot.com