active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
50 Replies Last post: Mar 9, 2007 6:47 PM by donnyl   Go to original post 1 2 3 4 Previous Next
Click to view ljwoodw's profile Legend 550 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
15. Mar 3, 2007 11:27 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by maryt:
cruxjuris
Talk to some of the fastest runners of the 70s now, and they will say how stupid some of the things were they did back then, and how they wouldn't advise runners now to do the same - like Bill Rodgers running a 200 mile week, not because he thought it would be beneficial, but just because some other runner did it.
<HR>


But this actually supports the OP's point. Bill Rodgers is one of the best American marathoners in history. The very things he advises people NOT to do might have been the same things that got him to the top. It's like Jeff Galloway - he was a great runner, but the training he promotes isn't the training that got him there. Maybe these were "stupid" things, but they didn't apparently didn't hurt them any.
Click to view maryt091's profile Legend 806 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
16. Mar 3, 2007 11:57 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by ljwoodw:
But this actually supports the OP's point. Bill Rodgers is one of the best American marathoners in history. The very things he advises people NOT to do might have been the same things that got him to the top. It's like Jeff Galloway - he was a great runner, but the training he promotes isn't the training that got him there. Maybe these were "stupid" things, but they didn't apparently didn't hurt them any.<HR>

Not going for the older but wiser, I see. In the conversations I've had he's been talking about succeeding despite doing some stupid things, not because of them. They might not have hurt his overall career, but some did cause setbacks in training, or being stale for races, not a good thing to happen when you are going for the win every time.

BTW, you're still a few years under 25, I think, and your brain still has some growing to do in those judgment areas, so I suppose you can be forgiven for the subway comment, but really... Good thing I had just finished my coffee, or it would have ended up all over my keyboard, I laughed so hard!
Click to view DanMoriarity's profile Legend 823 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
17. Mar 4, 2007 6:05 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by maryt:

BTW, you're still a few years under 25, I think, and your brain still has some growing to do in those judgment areas,
<HR>


That's ok Mary, 'cause you're judgemental enough for all of us ...

Like everything else, focus on safety can be good or bad depending on the extremes to which you take it. If it keeps you from driving 100mph through a school zone or running a marathon while you're experiencing chest pains, dizzyness and nausea, it's a good thing. If it keeps you in your house because you're afraid you'll get hit by a bus if you cross the street, then maybe not so much ...
Click to view mountainlake's profile Pro 74 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
18. Mar 4, 2007 6:27 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
This is a very interesting thread. BTW, I am posting only because the thread showed up on the main coolrunning page, because I am definitely not a mainstream racer. I am a SLOW runner. I don't think that necessarily makes me a "comfort" runner, though....

A few reactions: on the newbie board, the ones emphasizing safety are not the new runners, but the long-time runners who hang out there to give advice. The new runners are often about pushing as hard as they possibly can and to pick up as much speed as they possibly can, as quickly as they can. Of course, they often get injured because of this - you can see the posts in progression. "How can I improve my speed?" Long-time runners will post and say, "Don't start speedwork until you have a decent base." The new runner will argue with the long-time runners. Then a few weeks later, the new runner will post, "How do I deal with this injury?" Seriously, it happens over and over. I saw a thread on way cool running by a very talented girl who wanted to run every training run as a race. People were trying to caution her but she wouldn't listen. So it's the old-time runners who are cautioning the newbies, and frankly for good reason. Frankly, I don't think they are advocating "safety" as much as good running strategy.

This may have nothing to do with mainstream racers specifically, but I do think that the emphasis on safety is because lots of people get hurt doing too much, too soon. Is it an overemphasis on safety? I don't know.

The derision toward "comfort" runners is interesting. I just wanted to let you know that many slower, newer runners are not pushing for entertainment, etc. We just show up to races and it's there. My favorite races have been small 5ks and 10ks held by running groups. No entertainment whatsoever. My most hated race by far was the Epcot Race for the Taste 10k. Also, many slower/newer runners do not have the idiocy to run their first marathon in their first pair of running shoes. (I really like the way you said that, btw - I am going to use it, if you don't mind.) We know it's not safe .... (sorry, couldn't resist.) So while I don't like the derision toward "comfort" runners because I vaguely feel you are putting down anyone who is not super fast, I also recognize that there is good reason to be annoyed with people who don't take racing seriously and don't treat serious distances with the respect they deserve.

Now I have to go b/c I have to put in my time on the hotel treadmill before my trans-pacific flight this morning!
Click to view ctxcrossx's profile Pro 119 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
19. Mar 4, 2007 8:02 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
I don't really see the big deal. Honestly, if someone posts a question or is looking for advise, they are going to get that advice...hopefully with the pros and cons that relate to that topic.

For example, if someone asks about running from, nutrition, even race etiquette, I would probably respond with everything that I knew. If I encountered a possible danger from the wrong nutrition before a race, or something like that, why wouldn't I include it in the post?

Does it mean you have to follow it? No. I'd just be giving all of the information I could on a topic. You are free to pick and choose what you'd like to listen to.

Keep in mind that if someone is asking a question or for advice, it's probably because they don't know much about it, so if someone can give a friendly warning to avoid a possible pitfall (and throw off training), it's probably a good thing.

Finally, I may be wrong in this, but how do "comfort people" cause problems at races (besides lining up too far forward)? They don't jack up entry fees, as most of the items necessary for the race need to be there no matter what (prizes, police, etc.) What they pay in an entry fee more than offsets any additional cost that they bring to a race. Bullying their priorities? Race directors give the racers what they want. All of them, not just you. It sounds like you may be the person who is bullying their priority at a race just because you are faster, not because the majority want it. How exactly are you suffering by having entertainment, medals, scenery, charity at a race? These all seem to be good things to me.

Chris
Click to view Jim Sullivan032's profile Community Moderator 516 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
20. Mar 5, 2007 9:12 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
Safety is obviously a good thing, but I think it can be pushed to the point of adversely affecting training. The key to training is pushing yourself as hard as you can without getting hurt. I know that seems obvious, but I get the sense that a lot of people have forgotten that.

At 20, I definitely erred on the side of overtraining. At 45, I probably err slightly on the side of safety, mainly because it takes so long now to come back from an injury. To be honest, I've been trying since 1975 to find the right balance, and I'm still not sure that I've got it right.

I think it's pretty natural for younger runners to push their bodies past their limits, and I don't even know that it's a bad thing, provided the occasional physical breakdown helps establish what those limits are.
Click to view kevinmc025's profile Amateur 31 posts since
Feb 3, 2006
21. Mar 5, 2007 9:18 AM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
Heck, at 25, I never worried about overtraining or safety. Now, I think more about safety maybe because they consequences are greater. 25 - single. 48 - married with children.

quote:<HR>Originally posted by Jim Sullivan:
At 20, I definitely erred on the side of overtraining. At 45, I probably err slightly on the side of safety, mainly because it takes so long now to come back from an injury.<HR>
Click to view Warrior1971's profile Community Moderator 223 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
23. Mar 5, 2007 2:59 PM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
This topic reminded me of a good quote from Spaceballs. Throughout the movie, the commanders of Spaceball 1 are always ordering the crew to "prepare" for this, "prepare" for that. Toward the end of the movie, after one such command from Col. Sandurz, there is finally this exchange:

Dark Helmet: Why are we always "preparing"? Just go.
Colonel Sandurz: Just go.
Click to view mountainlake's profile Pro 74 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
24. Mar 5, 2007 3:15 PM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by cruxjuris:


By RACING I just mean TRYING TO COVER THE DISTANCE AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN. You can be a fast racer, a slow racer, a well-trained racer, a badly-trained racer. But be a racer. It takes a starting line, an arrival line, a clock.
Comfort People have other priorities along the way: food, entertainments, water stations every-mile, T-shirt, perks, medals for everyone, scenic courses etc.

<HR>


This is interesting. I am not sure I totally agree that it is only "comfort runners" that like the food and water stations, or the t-shirts. I love the t-shirts! I do feel a bit ambivalent about the finisher's medals. For a marathon or half marathon, absolutely. But for a 5k? I'm not terribly against them but I remember getting mine and I thought, wow, that's me and 6000 other people who ran this 5k who got this.

Here's a bit of different perspective on comfort runners, from someone at the back of the pack. The reason I hated the Race for the Taste 10k (Epcot) so much was that many of the people who lined up back with me (or actually in front of me, since I passed htem), were really there for a social event. They would be 4-7 people alternating walking/running, all in a row, so it was difficult to get around them. They were definitely not "racing" because they were loudly talking, laughing, etc. - something that you can't really do if you are giving it your all-out. I found these people were totally focused on themselves and therefore were totally unaware of the runners around them. I don't know why, but I just found it extremely annoying. I felt like saying, "This isn't a social gathering, it's a race!" I felt a little guilty for thinking it, but I definitely did not like it and vowed not to go back to that race. I have NOT experienced this at any other race, including the huge Gaspirilla races in Tampa. Yes, you see a little of that, but most people really are focused on the race.

The other thing is, I've seen many charity runners who are working their butts off. I don't know if it's fair to group them all together as "comfort" runners. They are sweating, they are breathing hard, they are really working, even though they are slow. Of course, I have only run a 15k up to this point, and I understand that half marathons and marathons especially attract charity runners. I have no experience with that yet.

One last thing that I thought of: those "social" runners (maybe that is a better term than comfort runner?) actually are doing going things for their health. Yes, I find them very annoying, but I should be glad they are out getting exercise. The obesity crisis in the US costs the economy a lot of money, so anything that promotes better health should be encouraged. I guess the way around this is for me to stick to non-Disney races so that I don't have to be caught in the crowds of social runners?

Some good stuff to think about!
Click to view donnyl's profile Legend 590 posts since
Nov 9, 2007
26. Mar 5, 2007 4:42 PM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by cruxjuris:
[b]... Had to cut short

The needs of Comfort People are jacking up entry fees. Nowadays, you have to have marathons in the heart of major cities. Who would dare to carve a course in the industrial / weekend-empty areas of towns ? As you said, race directors are giving what a majority of participants wants. If I want to join, I'm requested to pay extra $ for stuff unrelated to what road racing requires. I decide. No big deal. It is just too bad that Comfort people are getting amateur road running competition events to be redesigned according to their needs.
Money talks I guess[/b]<HR>


Times change, and in this case I think for the better. More people are involved and hopefully living a healthier life. Personally, I much preferred the old days when everyone who showed up was serious, but you can still be as serious as you want to be and others shouldn't get in your way. I don't see how your "comfort people" have any affect once the gun goes off. Maybe you're mad because you think being a serious runner ought to mean something. Guess what? It doesn't now and it didn't then. If you want to be a serious racer, do it for you, that's all that really matters. There are plenty of races for everyone. But always remember the most important thing.........be safe.
Click to view maryt091's profile Legend 806 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
27. Mar 5, 2007 5:41 PM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by cruxjuris:
Mountainlake: Thanks for your well-thought response.

"Comfort people" are the ones signing up for races without racing in mind (just wanna finish, just wanna have a good time, just wanna raise money for charity etc...). Come down now. By RACING I just mean TRYING TO COVER THE DISTANCE AS QUICKLY AS YOU CAN. You can be a fast racer, a slow racer, a well-trained racer, a badly-trained racer. But be a racer. It takes a starting line, an arrival line, a clock.
Comfort People have other priorities along the way: food, entertainments, water stations every-mile, T-shirt, perks, medals for everyone, scenic courses etc... This is why entry fees are going up. Insurance is expensive because of the financial successes of the events, not because of the risks involved.

<HR>
food, entertainments, water stations every-mile, T-shirt, perks, medals for everyone, scenic courses etc... and that has what to do with safety???
Click to view angrek's profile Pro 127 posts since
Aug 14, 2007
29. Mar 5, 2007 8:16 PM in response to: cruxjuris
Re: Sick of safety
quote:<HR>Originally posted by mountainlake:
I found these people were totally focused on themselves and therefore were totally unaware of the runners around them. I don't know why, but I just found it extremely annoying. I felt like saying, "This isn't a social gathering, it's a race!" I felt a little guilty for thinking it, but I definitely did not like it and vowed not to go back to that race. I have NOT experienced this at any other race, including the huge Gaspirilla races in Tampa. Yes, you see a little of that, but most people really are focused on the race.
<HR>


Maybe you should move up a little bit more towards the front. You'll still have slower people in front of you no matter what, but maybe you'll have to run through less of them. If you move up too far just stay off to the side so faster runners can go by. I'm a little split on this as my wife alternates between running and walking gasparilla because she enjoys it and she considers it a 'fun' event. It'd be hard for me to take that away from her. I enjoy the more racing side of it and that's just me. She goes back of the pack and I go up near the front. (we run the 5K...placed 177th out of 6648) Anyway, I guess if I started near the rear I might be a little more frustrated. Then again I've heard of people over in Disney and other races having to race hard the last few miles to beat someone in a Goofy costume and what not. Hehehe.

Btw, not to hijack a topic, but has anyone every been seeded by accident?? We were standing up at the starting line at the Gasparilla 5K and they called all the seeded runners up, specifically, the ones with yellow bibs. So I'm looking around at all the track guys in front of me and these other guys that look faster than me and none of them had a yellow bib. "That's odd.," I commented. "I wonder what they look like." This guy to my left kind of looks at me tentatively, pauses like he's waiting to see if I'm joking, and then says "uh, well, it looks like yours..." as all these people (that look really fast!) around me turn to look at my bib. I must have looked like a deer in headlights. My wife started trying to push me up there telling me "You're not giving yourself enough credit!" Then these security guards see this and they're all "Sir, come this way, come up here. Come up in this section." At this point I'm like a cat clawing at anything trying to stay out of the bathtub of water. I'm looking at them and pointing at the guys in flats saying "It's some sort of mistake! I'm kind of fast but I'm not THAT kind of fast!" Definitely one race start that I'll never forget.