active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community
36 Replies Last post: Jul 3, 2007 10:54 PM by rengle   Go to original post 1 2 3 Previous Next
Click to view MichiganFlyer2's profile Pro 159 posts since
May 13, 2007
15. Jun 27, 2007 9:39 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
quote:<HR>Originally posted by runfastcoach:


In my late 20s, I had run steadily for about 2 years, missing less than 5 days total. I found a routine that worked well for me: Day 1 (Easy)(7:30 per mile), Day 2 (Medium) (7:00 to 6:45 per mile), Day 3 (Semi-Strong, Tempo Running) (6:15 to 6:00 per mile over rolling hills). I was working a lot of hours, on my feet a lot, so I was tired all the time. That fact alone probably cost me 15-30 seconds per mile in my pace. But, I ran 15:13 on the track for 5,000m and 4:01.98 off that training.
<HR>


Wow you finally found something that worked for you.
Easy, Medium and Hard...I never thought to try something like that. I often feel tired dragging my body around and wonder if I should take 3 days off then come back very strong. Then again I hear Doc run 127 miles in 2 weeks (including a 19 mile run one morning) and he beats 20 minutes in a 5k. So I wonder what will make me faster.
I know more miles will do it but I am missing something. I wonder if I am too weak to get faster quickly.

I ran a 70 second lap on the track about 5 days ago. My muscles were pounding sore the day after that. I dont lift weights since my hernia surgery last February. I only weigh 143 pounds....maybe I am too skinny? I doubt it. I am getting to the sub 20 but it is agonizingly slow. And if I take a month off or even do a 20 mile week I feel like I will lose alot of my progress. So I continue to rack up miles but its around 35 per week on average thats the most I seem to get up too before feeling sluggish.
Click to view OldXCguy's profile Pro 179 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
16. Jun 27, 2007 10:18 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
Not sure what happened to the sub-20 thread. It seems to have died. Is it full? I guess this is the continuation.

First off, congrats to Docster on your sub-20! There has been
some good discussion of workouts on this thread and the other, and we've been fortunate enough to have Tinman join in. I can't help thinking that if we lived closer together we could help each other by doing workouts together. As I read people's workouts, they seem very similar to what I've been
doing.

As I noted on the other thread, I broke 20 for the first time in five years a couple of weeks ago. After that, it was back to mediocrity, with an uninspired 20:33 on a warm night a couple of Mondays ago, and a 20:28 on the track last Saturday. That last one was particularly tough, because there was only one other guy in the race (even though it was a fairly big meet), and he ran 16:40, lapping me a couple of times, so I was out there on my own. I wanted to try to hold sub-20 pace for as long as possible. I was OK through 1600 meters in 6:20, but then my laps started to slow, and by around halfway, I knew the sub-20 was gone. It took a lot of focus for me to keep from giving up and jogging in, but I held on and managed to get my second fastest time of the year.
MichiganFlyer, I don't know how you do those hard solo
5K's. More power to you.

I'm going to take a couple of easy weeks before starting base training for fall racing.

Good luck everyone! Keep it going.
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
17. Jun 28, 2007 9:05 AM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
Tinman,

I understand how stats can be applied to running, but calculus? What were you doing with that tool?
Click to view Dana Becker's profile Legend 392 posts since
Nov 20, 2007
18. Jun 28, 2007 10:44 AM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
quote:<HR>Originally posted by OldXCguy:
Not sure what happened to the sub-20 thread. It seems to have died. Is it full? I guess this is the continuation.

First off, congrats to Docster on your sub-20! There has been
some good discussion of workouts on this thread and the other, and we've been fortunate enough to have Tinman join in. I can't help thinking that if we lived closer together we could help each other by doing workouts together. As I read people's workouts, they seem very similar to what I've been
doing.

As I noted on the other thread, I broke 20 for the first time in five years a couple of weeks ago. After that, it was back to mediocrity, with an uninspired 20:33 on a warm night a couple of Mondays ago, and a 20:28 on the track last Saturday. That last one was particularly tough, because there was only one other guy in the race (even though it was a fairly big meet), and he ran 16:40, lapping me a couple of times, so I was out there on my own. I wanted to try to hold sub-20 pace for as long as possible. I was OK through 1600 meters in 6:20, but then my laps started to slow, and by around halfway, I knew the sub-20 was gone. It took a lot of focus for me to keep from giving up and jogging in, but I held on and managed to get my second fastest time of the year.
MichiganFlyer, I don't know how you do those hard solo
5K's. More power to you.

I'm going to take a couple of easy weeks before starting base training for fall racing.

Good luck everyone! Keep it going.

<HR>



Thanks! (and thanks to everyone else as well!) I agree....I don't know how Michigan does it. My biggest challenge now will be to continue to try to break 20:00. While part of me is too stubborn not to try...I'm still adapting (hopefully) to the discomfort required run that hard. I just have to remind myself that once I'm done I'll feel fine in a few minutes, unlike my marathons where it hurts for several days.
Click to view OldXCguy's profile Pro 179 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
20. Jun 28, 2007 6:51 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
MaineRunner, that sounds like a good plan, unless we can get the moderators to re-open the original thread. Lots of good info in there, although I'm told there is no search mechanism on this site. Perhaps it has become too unwieldy and in need of replacement.
Click to view denton083's profile Pro 199 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
21. Jun 28, 2007 9:10 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
....i would argue there is nothing really original out there today....more along the lines of people giving names, times, etc to training concepts... to mostly tried and true concepts. The nice thing, from my view, is that we've gotten beyond the pure science perspective of training and began to see it in the realm of 'real life' experiences. IMHO a combination of the real life and science together now has drastically helped the current status of US dist runners.... the only real original thing out there right now is how to mix the 'soup' to suit the individual athlete
Click to view Nobby063's profile Legend 630 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
22. Jun 29, 2007 3:25 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
quote:<HR>Originally posted by runfastcoach:
The McMillan steady state run mentioned is nothing but a ripoff from what I used to preach. I sent lots of information to his buddy Jonas Holdeman (who I didn't know was McMillan's buddy) and it was quickly convereted into "McMillan's" ideas. What baloney! <HR>


Tinman:

You are a decent guy and I believe you preach the correct training principles. You seem to have helped a log of young aspiring athletes and I really really appreciate your effort. However, you've got to stop this personal accusation on others, be it Daniels or Kellogg or Greg McMillan. If nothing else, I know Greg in person very well. He's one of the most honorable men I know of (well, maybe I praised him too much...). We have developed a very special bonding through Arthur Lydiard--Greg was the last person the Old Man was with; he was in the hotel room when Arthur passed away! Ever since, the guy has devoted himself to honor Lydiard (okay, maybe I'm exaggerating a bit here again!). But I believe the last thing Greg would do is to some silly tiny rat's *** thing like "stealing somebody's 'Steady State' training idea". At least, with almost 100% certainty I can say he's not that small.

Greg is one of our advisory board members, along with people like Peter Snell, Dave Martin, Steve Jones, Rod Dixon, Steve Scott...as well as your buddy, Nic Bideau. He's heading elite running group on behalf of Lydiard Foundation and we will be most likely making the official annoucement soon. And we would not appreciate anybody accusing one of our colleagues with some nonesense based on, according to Greg and Jonas Holdeman, "non-truth". If you feel that strongly about it, you should probably make the official legal action and we would be ready to counter as well.
Click to view runfastcoach's profile Pro 122 posts since
Jan 25, 2006
23. Jun 29, 2007 4:42 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
To Jonas, I appologize for bringinng your name up. I assumed you were the one who shared my ideas with McMillan, since you are friends and have a business together. Such an assumption has no factual basis, only a guess, and for that I can only say that I was wrong and I appologize to you .

Do I think you and Nobby have been duped by McMillan, I'll reserve that to my home. Do I think you deserve more respect than I gave you? Yes, absolutely. I was a hot-head and that have been rash in my expression. Again, I am sorry.

The one thing I know about you is that you care about your runners and you have expressed yourself well in thoughts and deeds. I wish you well and God's blessings in the future.

If it is any consolation, I will not be a problem for you or others in the future. I plan to stop coaching on the national and international level, altogether. Maybe in a couple years I'll coach some high schoolers, but that's too far off to think about now. Regardless, after Christmas, I won't be on the internet and will be out of your hair for good. Hopefully that will ease some of the discomfort I've caused you and anyone else.

Take care and good luck!

Tinman
Click to view runfastcoach's profile Pro 122 posts since
Jan 25, 2006
24. Jun 29, 2007 4:52 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
By the way, I just made a formal announcement on therunzone.com that I won't be on the internet after Christmas.

Take care,

Tinman
runfastcoach@gmail.com
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
25. Jun 29, 2007 8:23 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
quote:<HR>Originally posted by runfastcoach:
By the way, I just made a formal announcement on therunzone.com that I won't be on the internet after Christmas.

Take care,

Tinman
runfastcoach@gmail.com
<HR>


I have read your posts (hundreds of them on several websites) for several years now and all of them except one were courteous, friendly and full of respect. On balance, your impact out here among the kilobytes is far far far more posive than negative, and you just erased the negative by your apology. Before you leave you should know that thousands of runners around the world will lose access to your practical, friendly and straightforward advice when you stop posting. So I ask you to reconsider your decision. Stick around, if only on your own forum.
Click to view Tchuck's profile Legend 554 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
26. Jun 29, 2007 11:44 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
Ditto what Tigger said.

Tinman, I don't know what happened behind the scenes but you felt it warranted an apology. Done! Over with! You have mine and most others complete support and backing.

On our personal communications I have always pushed for you to participate more here on Coolrunning and as of late you have and it is much appreciated by 99% of us. I hope you will continue and definitely reconsider your plans at year's end. Also, many of are going to buy that book of yours which I know is getting closer to being completed.

------------------
Todd[/URL" target="_blank">
Click to view tigger077's profile Legend 691 posts since
Nov 19, 1999
27. Jun 30, 2007 5:39 AM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
quote:<HR> Also, many of are going to buy that book of yours which I know is getting closer to being completed.

[/B]<HR>


A book??? Mmmmm! I look forward to it!
Click to view rengle's profile Pro 94 posts since
Dec 14, 2007
29. Jun 30, 2007 11:49 PM in response to: MaineRunner2001
Re: Thanks to tinman (sub 20 minute thread broken?)
Tinman,
I've just found this thread. I've written something like this to you before. If you become a public figure, and you've become one in our little internet running world, you will draw some criticism from time to time. ****, I even got slammed at Letsrun once for reading a Runner's World article in Borders rather than buying the magazine and I'm nowhere near as public as you are.
I think you've been very helpful to a lot of people and I generally think of you as one of the folks who knows what they're talking about and I don't think that about a whole lot of people. So I really think you should hang on and endure the occasional critic. Nobby and I were talking earlier today and even though the last exchange he had with you wasn't pleasant, he agreed that you help a lot of people.
Still, if you've had enough you've had enough. But if that's the case, I have to ask, why wait until Christmas?