They do talk very briefly about midfoot but you are right, the study uses the term forefoot more exclusively.. and you are right that they show the impact of heel strike is the same shod or bare. Any runner, shod or not, CAN learn a fore or midfoot strike and derive the benefits thereof. What most barefoot and true minimalist footwear followers will tell you is it is just a whole lot EASIER to learn that technique barefoot. As they say in the study , a heel strike with a bare foot is simply too painful to do for long... it will train you instinctively to stop doing it. Learning the same thing with a 1" wedge of foam under your heel is much harder to do.
what the study does explain in great detail, and often gets overlooked is
A) The impact forces of a bare heel strike and a shod heel strike are virtually identical in magnitude and profile. Both display that same impact transient. It dispels the notion that shoes in any way REDUCE impact. According to the study, They simply don't.
and
B) The overall peak in relation to body mass is almost the same heel or fore ( although fore is slightly less) but the rate of increase of force, in biophysical context, is MUCH slower in a forefoot landing, taking almost half a second per stride to reach impact with a forefoot stride vs an almost instantaneous impact spike in a heel strike.