Jan 20, 2003 12:12 AM
Faster 400 for faster 5000?
I think I need more speed to run faster. I run 28's in the 8K, the courses varied in terrain, and probably lenghts, therefore, my time varied also. I'm hoping to run sub 16 in the 5000 this spring. I think the way to do it is by both increasing speed and endurance. My fastest 100 is about 1 5seconds, my fastest 200 is 32. My fastest 400 is 1:04 My fastest 800's are about 2:10. My fastest miles are in the high 4:50's(haven't ran all out in a mile since hs). My fastest 5000 meters are in the high 16:30's(all out) to 16:40's. It always seems like I have the endurance for a race. It also always seems like I'm running just a little bit slower than my top sprint speed in a race. Sometimes I feel I kick in a race faster than I've ever sprinted in a workout. I've always thought if I could sprint faster, I could then run a faster 400 which would translate to a faster 800, then to a faster mile and finally a faster 5K. After reading the posts of fastnfurious, who runs a faster 8K than me, it seems to be true that I probably need more pure speed to run faster. Right now though, I'm doing base building with my longest run so far this winter almost 13 miles, I also hit the weights every other day. I want to build more pure speed, but I also don't want to argue with my coach this season because I've improved by leaps and bounds under his instruction. But it seems like I've improved my ability to run for long times at near 100% speed, but I feel I don't have enough pure speed to ever run the times that I would ultimately like to run.