active network espn
Community: Exchange advice in the forums and read running commentary Resources: Personal running log, calculators, links and other tools for runners News: Running news from around the world Training: Articles and advice about fitness, race training and injury prevention Races/Results: Find upcoming races and past results Home: The Cool Running homepage
Cool Running homepage  Search Cool Running Community

Last post: Jun 6, 2007 11:07 AM by exciton RSS Go to original post 1 2 3 Previous Next
oar096 Rookie 53 posts since
Jul 1, 2006
Currently Being Moderated
31. May 29, 2007 3:48 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

If you are comfortable then you are not running too fast.
You might be running too slow.

sack77 Rookie 14 posts since
Apr 10, 2005
Currently Being Moderated
32. Jun 3, 2007 2:09 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

I have a similiar story to yours.  Up until this January, I was averaging between 20-25mpw and ran a lot of my miles at around 8:00.  I upped my mileage to 35-40mpw with a long run between 10-12 each week at around 9:30.  The other 4 days I run are usually between 8:45 and 9:15.  The only thing that remotely resembles speed work is that if I'm feeling particularily good I'll run the last few miles of a run at close to 8:00.  I don't even do that every week, maybe twice a month.

My old 10k PR was a 51:30.  I ran a 46:40 last week.  Since I'm not doing any speedwork, the only possible explanation is the increased mileage.  I don't think I could have done the extra mileage running the pace I was before.  So, FWIW, more mileage + slower pace = almost 5 min PR for me.

Dana Becker Amateur 385 posts since
Nov 20, 2007
Currently Being Moderated
33. Jun 3, 2007 3:00 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

quote:


Originally posted by mrinertia:

I am a pretty analytical guy. However I've been reluctant to get a HRM because everyone says it's going to tell me to slow it down. I don't want to want to slow down. I run, for the most part, at a pretty comfortable pace, even if that pace is closer to race pace than recomended. I'm not a particularly fast runner yet and slowing even further would be psychologically uncomfortable for me. I run my training runs about a 9:15-9:45 pace depending on the distance. A few things about slowing down: firstly, I am comfortable at that pace. Secondly, time is a factor. An 8 mile run at 11 minutes takes 14 minutes longer than it would at a 9:15 pace. When my feet hit the floor at 4:45 am, I am thankful for that 14 extra minutes. I understand that I cannot run every run at race pace, nor do I want to. By the same token, it makes sense that running slow teaches slow running.


 




So, you run a lot of 9:30 miles, including long runs (well 9:40 you stated) and you aren't sure you can run a 8:30 paced 10K? If you can't then you are clearly running too hard, period. You should be able to hammer an 8:15 fairly easily with those training efforts.

Aside from that, you sound like your mind is made up. You don't want to slow down. Maybe you don't need to. You might run a sub 8:00 10K time.

I run a lot of 9:00 to 9:20 miles. 90% of my miles lately are in that range, if not more. I can run 7:45 miles without much effort. Conversational, even. However, that doesn't mean I do it every day.

Running slow does teach slow running. You are right. However it doesn't make you slow. What you fail to understand is that can make you faster, yet you don't want to hear that. You say you don't want to slow down, but do you want to get faster? You just might have to slow down to get faster. Let us know how the 10K race goes, and good luck.

Dana Becker Amateur 385 posts since
Nov 20, 2007
Currently Being Moderated
35. Jun 4, 2007 9:12 AM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

quote:


Originally posted by mrinertia:

Thanks for you input everyone. My 10k is next Saturday. I'll post my results. I'm pretty nervous. I've entered races before and have run them all pretty hard, but I don't know that I've ever run a full on, bang your head against the wall RACE. I'm looking forward to it and dreading it at the same time. It's almost a week away and I'm starting to get jitters. I'll asess my training paces based on my performance next week nad make adjustments if needed. Wish me luck, I'll keep you posted.


 



I know how you feel. I've run...oh..8 to 10 races in the last 9 months, and I still don't know that I've really laid it all out there during a race, perhaps aside from my last marathon, but even then I'm pretty sure I could have run 10 seconds faster per mile.

Just make sure you get a good warmup in. I'd say at least 1.5 miles, up to 2 or so. Trying to race hard without a good warmup makes for a rough start I've noticed.

michaelsnelliam Rookie 21 posts since
Mar 3, 2006
Currently Being Moderated
36. Jun 4, 2007 4:32 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

quote:


Originally posted by superburtm:

running slow= slow running


 




Killer whale = whale killer

George in Fremont Rookie 209 posts since
Aug 28, 2005
Currently Being Moderated
37. Jun 4, 2007 8:37 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

quote:


Originally posted by sack77:



My old 10k PR was a 51:30. I ran a 46:40 last week. Since I'm not doing any speedwork, the only possible explanation is the increased mileage. I don't think I could have done the extra mileage running the pace I was before. So, FWIW, more mileage + slower pace = almost 5 min PR for me.


 



You were doing tempo runs without even knowing it. Your tempo pace is somewhere between 7:30+ to 8:10+ or so when you improved from 51:30 to 46:40.

So, for people who define speedworks to include tempos, you were almost doing weekly speedworks!!!

George in Fremont Rookie 209 posts since
Aug 28, 2005
Currently Being Moderated
39. Jun 5, 2007 11:42 PM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

quote:


Originally posted by mrinertia:




Firstly, I'm in taper hell. I've never really thought there was much need to taper for a 10k because they're comparitively short. Chalk that up to being an uneducated Newbie. Per my mentor's recomendation, I'm only doing 12 miles this week leading up to the race on Saturday. My week looks like this:



 



I don't know if you need to taper so much for a 10k. I usually do about 2/3 of my normal mileage but will reduce my tempos and intervals significantly.



----



Happy running !

My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

exciton Rookie 317 posts since
Nov 2, 2004
Currently Being Moderated
40. Jun 6, 2007 11:07 AM in response to: mrinertia
Re: interval training at the cost of long runs?

I hope I am not repeating another post. I skimmed the other responses but don't have time to read in detail.

One mistake that I think almost all new runners make is that their easy days are just not easy enough. If you are trying to accomodate three key workouts per week, then you need to make sure the intervening easy days are truly easy. What is easy? For me, after an easy run I can take a few walking steps and my breathing is normal. I feel like I could easily do the whole run over again. There is no fatigue involved. These runs are for recovery and for practicing your form. You may have to deliberately hold back to keep yourself from picking up the pace. Get over the idea that every run should give a significant training stress. Focus on hitting the splits in your key workouts that will lead to the fulfillment of your racing goals.

----



My Profile[/URL" target="_blank">

More Like This

  • Retrieving data ...

Bookmarked By (0)