I've been running on and off for more than ten years and started using a HR monitor about 3 or 4 yrs ago. I usually run at an avg hr of 155 to 161, which seems awfully high given that I'm not even close to an elite runner. Like I said, I run on and off which means that I'll run for 4 to 6 months and then don't run for a month or so. I'm 5'6", 178 lbs, and I'm currently running 4 or 5 times a week for a total of about 45 to 50 kms per week. During the regular runs (not the long run) I usually try to sprint on the last 1 or 2 kilometer, so I end up my run at a fairly high HR (usually between 168 to 173) but my HR goes down rather quickly. It goes down to about 145 within the first 2 minutes after I stop running. I heard this is good. Also, my rested HR (first thing in the morning) is about 80. Anyway, I do feel fine after my runs eventhough my HR seems high but I get concerned when I talked to other fellow runners who run at much lower HRs. Should I be? ...oops btw, I'm 49 yrs old and run at very high humidity.
Elite vs. non-elite shouldn't matter - its all a matter of fitness.
I'm a 45 year old with close to 40,000 miles under my belt. My best marathon was last fall. I trained most of my runs at a heart rate between 130-140; my max HR is 185.
I have tested various levels. My max is 185. For a 10 mile run, I average about 168. For my marathon PR, I averaged 163. For speedwork, I get my HR up to 175 - or 168 for threshold runs. Yet, I rarely, for normal runs, go above 145 - trying to keep below 140. This is my MAF pace. Check out Van Aaken or Maffetone... you'll learn a lot. Or buy Stu Mittleman's book.
ACTIVE is the leader in online event registrations from 5k running races and marathons to softball leagues and local events. ACTIVE also makes it easy to learn and prepare for all the things you love to do with expert resources, training plans and fitness calculators.